#11
|
|||
|
|||
Rim Width
Callistus Valerius wrote:
wider the rim the less rolling resistance, but higher the aerodynamic resistance. that's why the pros, use skinny rims, they're less aero. Your second sentence seems to contradict your first. And I do not believe that aerodynamics play a part at all in racers' choice of rims. Tom |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Rim Width
Tom Reingold writes:
I recall a few years ago, Jobst Brandt did some extensive testing and found that rolling resistance actually increases when tire width goes below 28mm. I would guess that width doesn't have as much an effect on rolling resistance as you'd think. I think the tire material and construction and inflation pressure are more important. I got a mountain bike cheap at a local police auction. It had fat, knobby tires. The tires were so loud, I thought a truck was behind me when I went downhill. I replaced them with 1.4 inch (35mm) slick tires and inflated them to 100 psi. The bike now rides like a road racer. I'm a very happy rider now. That's interesting and opposite of what I've read (I'm new to this). My daughter was grumped because I roll better than she. I'm on 23's while she's on 35's. OTOH, she has a LOT of tread while I have almost slicks. So there is a factor we didn't put in here. I'll look for 28's with very smooth tread. My buddy who rides a mtn bike with slicks says I'm faster than him because of my 23's. I'd LIKE to think it's me and not the bike. Is Brandt's work published on the Web somewhere? It's not so much my work but rather a presentation of what IRC measured for Avocet when Avocet introducing smooth tread tires at my behest, tires that had been offered in the past but with no explanation on their benefits or the lack of benefits of miniature automotive tread imitations. Road motorcycles arrived upon that a few years earlier and before that racing cars that inherited the concept from drag racers. In this history the misunderstanding among tribologists is revealed best. They had no idea where traction arose and on what scale hydroplaning occurs. Thanks to Terry Morse these curves are displayed on his website. I'm sure weight, tire pressure, weight distribution, air drag, and other factors are at play, too. But yes, tread is bad on a bike tire. Jobst also found that tread on bike tires are purely cosmetic unless you are in very slippery terrain. That's why he invented slick tires. If your tires have very fine tread, it neither helps nor hinders. Most people want a little tread, because they believe it helps, but Jobst found it not to be true. Let's say the motorized industry proved that one for me. I just happened to be working in racing cars at the time these developments came along and recognized their application in bicycling. I don't know if it's on the web, but you can find old usenet articles at http://groups.google.com And he might be able to answer right here! http://www.terrymorse.com/bike/rolres.html http://yarchive.net/bike/rolling_resistance.html http://www.cqq.ch/Moto/1Moto_images/.../GP-Vale_2.jpg Jobst Brandt |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Rim Width
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Rim Width
wrote in message ... Tom Reingold writes: I recall a few years ago, Jobst Brandt did some extensive testing and found that rolling resistance actually increases when tire width goes below 28mm. I would guess that width doesn't have as much an effect on rolling resistance as you'd think. I think the tire material and construction and inflation pressure are more important. I got a mountain bike cheap at a local police auction. It had fat, knobby tires. The tires were so loud, I thought a truck was behind me when I went downhill. I replaced them with 1.4 inch (35mm) slick tires and inflated them to 100 psi. The bike now rides like a road racer. I'm a very happy rider now. That's interesting and opposite of what I've read (I'm new to this). My daughter was grumped because I roll better than she. I'm on 23's while she's on 35's. OTOH, she has a LOT of tread while I have almost slicks. So there is a factor we didn't put in here. I'll look for 28's with very smooth tread. My buddy who rides a mtn bike with slicks says I'm faster than him because of my 23's. I'd LIKE to think it's me and not the bike. Is Brandt's work published on the Web somewhere? It's not so much my work but rather a presentation of what IRC measured for Avocet when Avocet introducing smooth tread tires at my behest, tires that had been offered in the past but with no explanation on their benefits or the lack of benefits of miniature automotive tread imitations. Road motorcycles arrived upon that a few years earlier and before that racing cars that inherited the concept from drag racers. In this history the misunderstanding among tribologists is revealed best. They had no idea where traction arose and on what scale hydroplaning occurs. Thanks to Terry Morse these curves are displayed on his website. I'm sure weight, tire pressure, weight distribution, air drag, and other factors are at play, too. But yes, tread is bad on a bike tire. Jobst also found that tread on bike tires are purely cosmetic unless you are in very slippery terrain. That's why he invented slick tires. If your tires have very fine tread, it neither helps nor hinders. Most people want a little tread, because they believe it helps, but Jobst found it not to be true. Let's say the motorized industry proved that one for me. I just happened to be working in racing cars at the time these developments came along and recognized their application in bicycling. I don't know if it's on the web, but you can find old usenet articles at http://groups.google.com And he might be able to answer right here! http://www.terrymorse.com/bike/rolres.html http://yarchive.net/bike/rolling_resistance.html http://www.cqq.ch/Moto/1Moto_images/.../GP-Vale_2.jpg Jobst Brandt Now that the compound has changed with the Avocet tires listed in the test, has the results been the same, or updated? -tom |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Rim Width
Tom Nakashima wrote:
Now that the compound has changed with the Avocet tires listed in the test, has the results been the same, or updated? -tom Are Avocet tires even available any more? -- Tom Reingold Noo Joizy This email address works, but only for a short time. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Rim Width
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 06:37:48 -0700, "Tom Nakashima"
wrote: wrote in message ... Tom Reingold writes: I recall a few years ago, Jobst Brandt did some extensive testing and found that rolling resistance actually increases when tire width goes below 28mm. I would guess that width doesn't have as much an effect on rolling resistance as you'd think. I think the tire material and construction and inflation pressure are more important. I got a mountain bike cheap at a local police auction. It had fat, knobby tires. The tires were so loud, I thought a truck was behind me when I went downhill. I replaced them with 1.4 inch (35mm) slick tires and inflated them to 100 psi. The bike now rides like a road racer. I'm a very happy rider now. That's interesting and opposite of what I've read (I'm new to this). My daughter was grumped because I roll better than she. I'm on 23's while she's on 35's. OTOH, she has a LOT of tread while I have almost slicks. So there is a factor we didn't put in here. I'll look for 28's with very smooth tread. My buddy who rides a mtn bike with slicks says I'm faster than him because of my 23's. I'd LIKE to think it's me and not the bike. Is Brandt's work published on the Web somewhere? It's not so much my work but rather a presentation of what IRC measured for Avocet when Avocet introducing smooth tread tires at my behest, tires that had been offered in the past but with no explanation on their benefits or the lack of benefits of miniature automotive tread imitations. Road motorcycles arrived upon that a few years earlier and before that racing cars that inherited the concept from drag racers. In this history the misunderstanding among tribologists is revealed best. They had no idea where traction arose and on what scale hydroplaning occurs. Thanks to Terry Morse these curves are displayed on his website. I'm sure weight, tire pressure, weight distribution, air drag, and other factors are at play, too. But yes, tread is bad on a bike tire. Jobst also found that tread on bike tires are purely cosmetic unless you are in very slippery terrain. That's why he invented slick tires. If your tires have very fine tread, it neither helps nor hinders. Most people want a little tread, because they believe it helps, but Jobst found it not to be true. Let's say the motorized industry proved that one for me. I just happened to be working in racing cars at the time these developments came along and recognized their application in bicycling. I don't know if it's on the web, but you can find old usenet articles at http://groups.google.com And he might be able to answer right here! http://www.terrymorse.com/bike/rolres.html http://yarchive.net/bike/rolling_resistance.html http://www.cqq.ch/Moto/1Moto_images/.../GP-Vale_2.jpg Jobst Brandt Now that the compound has changed with the Avocet tires listed in the test, has the results been the same, or updated? -tom Dear Tom, Those rolling resistance tests are from 1986: "Tires, AVOCET and SPECIALIZED, 18 Apr 86" "The age of these tests and the picture is apparent from the old toe clips and straps." "What should be noted is that no one has made subsequent RR tests that are anywhere as comprehensive and inclusive of tires on the market. I suspect there is little interest in the subject from what I see on the road. [2001] http://www.terrymorse.com/bike/rrdiscuss.html Carl Fogel |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Rim Width
Tom Nakashima writes:
Now that the compound has changed with the Avocet tires listed in the test, has the results been the same, or updated? Avocet is not actively pursuing tire marketing at the moment and their tires are not currently made by IRC that got out of the bicycle tire business a while back to concentrate on motor vehicles. That may change, however, I am not involved in any of that. Jobst Brandt |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Rim Width
Carl Fogel writes:
Those rolling resistance tests are from 1986: "Tires, AVOCET and SPECIALIZED, 18 Apr 86" "The age of these tests and the picture is apparent from the old toe clips and straps." What should not be overlooked is that nothing substantive has changed in tire casings, rims, tire beads, or carbon black rubber since then. Rolling resistance is still caused by elastomeric deflection in tread, casing and tube of clincher tires along with rim glue for tubulars. These tests were landmarks in that respect and remain as valid now as then. I suspect that Clement knew about rim glue losses or there would not have been track glue for events where fractions of seconds made a difference. "What should be noted is that no one has made subsequent RR tests that are anywhere as comprehensive and inclusive of tires on the market. I suspect there is little interest in the subject from what I see on the road. [2001] That is correct. Today the emphasis is fashion and color is in. No one seems particularly interested in RR, wear rate, or wet traction. As I mentioned, Clement made TT tubular tires with red treads in the days of yore because they were known at that time to have lower RR than carbon black rubber. I and my riding companions discovered the lack of wet traction first hand. I believe the Clement archives could reveal some interesting measurements if they haven't all been trashed... which they probably were. http://www.terrymorse.com/bike/rrdiscuss.html Jobst Brandt |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Rim Width
|
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MTB - Rim width vs. Tire width | Ned Mantei | Techniques | 5 | July 11th 04 12:01 AM |
Matching tire width to rim width. | mscalisi | Unicycling | 4 | April 15th 04 05:48 PM |
Tire Width Range for a Mavic T-224 Rim. | Narayan Krishnamoorthy | Techniques | 1 | March 13th 04 01:17 PM |
Optimal Rim Width for Tire Size | HKEK | Techniques | 1 | December 19th 03 06:48 PM |
handlebar width for new road bike | Warren Ginn | General | 9 | September 26th 03 06:31 AM |