|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#111
|
|||
|
|||
two-wheeled scum murdering pedestrians again
Tony Dragon wrote:
On 08/04/2011 19:56, Tony Raven wrote: Tony wrote: On 08/04/2011 19:11, Tony Raven wrote: Tony wrote: There are no exceptions - merely a tax rate of zero. So in that case he pays zero ( one of the exceptions) Why is it an exception? Is the zero rated band of income tax an exception (hardly since it applies to everyone with income) or just a zero rated tax band? . Good so you agree that the payment is a pre-requisite for using the vehicle on the road (being allowed use the road0 No because for quite a few models of car there is no payment. Having a VED disc is a prerequisite but it needn't cost you anything. Wriggle, wriggle The most honest exposition of your position yet. Do you require a spade for your digging? No thanks, your doing quite well with it yourself. -- Tony |
Ads |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
two-wheeled scum murdering pedestrians again
Matt B wrote:
On 08/04/2011 22:10, Tony Raven wrote: Matt wrote: It's not necessarily bigger /or/ more polluting cars, as neither of those are used as criteria for establishing the tax level. "Vehicle tax rates for cars registered on or after 1 March 2001 are split into 13 bands depending on CO2 emissions. The amount you'll pay depends on which band your car is in. The lower a car’s emissions, the lower the vehicle tax payable on it." http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Motoring...le/DG_10012524 I expect you'll try to claim CO2 isn't pollution. It is not how much they pollute, it is their theoretical _potential_ to pollute (well emit CO2) that dictates the tax rate. The amount that is actually emitted during the year is _not_ taken into account. A band M car is taxed at GBP460.00 even if it is kept on the road, but travels zero miles (and thus doesn't pollute at all) in a year. Similarly a band A isn't taxed, even if it travels 100,000 miles in a year and pollutes a lot! So you would vary your annual mileage according to the emission level of your car? -- Tony |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
two-wheeled scum murdering pedestrians again
On 08/04/2011 22:37, Tony Raven wrote:
Matt wrote: On 08/04/2011 22:10, Tony Raven wrote: Matt wrote: It's not necessarily bigger /or/ more polluting cars, as neither of those are used as criteria for establishing the tax level. "Vehicle tax rates for cars registered on or after 1 March 2001 are split into 13 bands depending on CO2 emissions. The amount you'll pay depends on which band your car is in. The lower a car’s emissions, the lower the vehicle tax payable on it." http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Motoring...le/DG_10012524 I expect you'll try to claim CO2 isn't pollution. It is not how much they pollute, it is their theoretical _potential_ to pollute (well emit CO2) that dictates the tax rate. The amount that is actually emitted during the year is _not_ taken into account. A band M car is taxed at GBP460.00 even if it is kept on the road, but travels zero miles (and thus doesn't pollute at all) in a year. Similarly a band A isn't taxed, even if it travels 100,000 miles in a year and pollutes a lot! So you would vary your annual mileage according to the emission level of your car? I must have missed the bit where he said that, could you point it out? |
#114
|
|||
|
|||
two-wheeled scum murdering pedestrians again
On 08/04/2011 22:37, Tony Raven wrote:
Tony wrote: On 08/04/2011 19:56, Tony Raven wrote: Tony wrote: On 08/04/2011 19:11, Tony Raven wrote: Tony wrote: There are no exceptions - merely a tax rate of zero. So in that case he pays zero ( one of the exceptions) Why is it an exception? Is the zero rated band of income tax an exception (hardly since it applies to everyone with income) or just a zero rated tax band? . Good so you agree that the payment is a pre-requisite for using the vehicle on the road (being allowed use the road0 No because for quite a few models of car there is no payment. Having a VED disc is a prerequisite but it needn't cost you anything. Wriggle, wriggle The most honest exposition of your position yet. Do you require a spade for your digging? No thanks, your doing quite well with it yourself. I'm not the one in the hole. |
#115
|
|||
|
|||
two-wheeled scum murdering pedestrians again
On 08/04/2011 16:03, Front Mech wrote:
On 7 apr, 18:37, " wrote: On Apr 7, 3:46 pm, Sedentary IgnorantPopulist wrote: On 6 apr, 20:38, The Medway wrote: On 06/04/2011 18:55, Simon Mason wrote: On Apr 6, 6:14 pm, The Medway wrote: On 05/04/2011 18:59, Simon Mason wrote: On Apr 5, 6:51 pm, The Medway wrote: Same here, plus 300 quid on two tyres. But in the black/white world of the Medway Man and his ilk, cyclists do not own cars or drive. They are *all* non tax paying, law breaking scum, so I was trying to keep things simple. ;-) You obviously need to keep things simple. Cyclists are sponging freeloaders when they cycle. When driving they have paid an 'extra' tax for using that vehicle on the road. When cycling they have not paid an 'extra' tax to use that vehicle on the road. Even you should be able to grasp that. See Janet in her car. Janet has never paid a penny for fuel, VED, tyres, MOTs, insurance, repairs etc in her life. Her cycling husband John has paid every last penny of it all. Janet is a free loading driving scum. Did you take evening classes in being a thick ****? The point is that 'someone' paid the EXTRA tax so she could drive on the road. Correct - I do. She doesn't. Cyclists don't pay an EXTRA tax. The person who actually paid the VED on Janet's car is a cyclist. Therefore a cyclist has paid the extra tax. Simple enough now? A cyclist has paid the EXTRA tax so a CAR can be used on the road NOT A ****ING PUSH BIKE. Retard. -- Dave - The Medway Handymanwww.medwayhandyman.co.uk You is so right Davey, I luv yer! it shoold be illeagle to use a kids'toy (bike) if you have pyed your road tacx - you shoold be maid to drive - youre wright. This cyclist cut me up yesterday and I called him a tacx free ****er. he said he had a car: I punched him in the face. I said Dave says you shoold be ****ing innit then. Keep up your ecxellant work Dave: I woold vote for yeah. Would you agree that the owner of a car has to pay a specific tax/duty/ etc(s) to enable him to use the car on the road (forget the exceptions)? Would you agree that the owner of a bicycle does not have to pay a specific tax/duty/etc(s)c to enable him to use the bicycle on the road (forget the exceptions)? There are no exceptions - merely a tax rate of zero. Tax is not "earmarked" - the money goes into the general receipts of the government. You mean it was stolen by politicians? Therefore no-one pays a tax specifically to use a road. The taxing of a car is a pre-requisite to its being allowed on the road and not a specific payment for road use. You can't use (the vast majority) of cars on the 'road' without paying Road Tax. Its not a tax on owning a car or driving a car on private land - its a tax for road use. In fact, the spending upon roads is not covered by VED and non-car users subsidise car users in regard to government spending on roads. FXhysterical laughterFX Are you suggesting that, by dint of having paid Road Tax, a car-driver has more right to be on the road than a cyclist? Absolutely. IFYPFY. -- Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk |
#116
|
|||
|
|||
two-wheeled scum murdering pedestrians again
On 08/04/2011 19:11, Tony Raven wrote:
Tony wrote: There are no exceptions - merely a tax rate of zero. So in that case he pays zero ( one of the exceptions) Why is it an exception? Is the zero rated band of income tax an exception (hardly since it applies to everyone with income) or just a zero rated tax band? . Good so you agree that the payment is a pre-requisite for using the vehicle on the road (being allowed use the road0 No because for quite a few models of car there is no payment. Having a VED disc is a prerequisite but it needn't cost you anything. But for 94% of cars it is. Try a remedial maths class. -- Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk |
#117
|
|||
|
|||
two-wheeled scum murdering pedestrians again
On 08/04/2011 22:37, Tony Raven wrote:
Matt wrote: On 08/04/2011 22:10, Tony Raven wrote: Matt wrote: It's not necessarily bigger /or/ more polluting cars, as neither of those are used as criteria for establishing the tax level. "Vehicle tax rates for cars registered on or after 1 March 2001 are split into 13 bands depending on CO2 emissions. The amount you'll pay depends on which band your car is in. The lower a car’s emissions, the lower the vehicle tax payable on it." http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Motoring...le/DG_10012524 I expect you'll try to claim CO2 isn't pollution. It is not how much they pollute, it is their theoretical _potential_ to pollute (well emit CO2) that dictates the tax rate. The amount that is actually emitted during the year is _not_ taken into account. A band M car is taxed at GBP460.00 even if it is kept on the road, but travels zero miles (and thus doesn't pollute at all) in a year. Similarly a band A isn't taxed, even if it travels 100,000 miles in a year and pollutes a lot! So you would vary your annual mileage according to the emission level of your car? If you have a band A commuting car and a band M weekend car, you could easily be emitting twice as much CO2 with the car that attracts no tax as you do with the car that you have to pay GBP460 for the year on. Car road tax isn't determined by the amount you pollute (or emit CO2). -- Matt B |
#118
|
|||
|
|||
two-wheeled scum murdering pedestrians again
On 08/04/2011 23:12, Matt B wrote:
On 08/04/2011 22:37, Tony Raven wrote: Matt wrote: On 08/04/2011 22:10, Tony Raven wrote: Matt wrote: It's not necessarily bigger /or/ more polluting cars, as neither of those are used as criteria for establishing the tax level. "Vehicle tax rates for cars registered on or after 1 March 2001 are split into 13 bands depending on CO2 emissions. The amount you'll pay depends on which band your car is in. The lower a car’s emissions, the lower the vehicle tax payable on it." http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Motoring...le/DG_10012524 I expect you'll try to claim CO2 isn't pollution. It is not how much they pollute, it is their theoretical _potential_ to pollute (well emit CO2) that dictates the tax rate. The amount that is actually emitted during the year is _not_ taken into account. A band M car is taxed at GBP460.00 even if it is kept on the road, but travels zero miles (and thus doesn't pollute at all) in a year. Similarly a band A isn't taxed, even if it travels 100,000 miles in a year and pollutes a lot! So you would vary your annual mileage according to the emission level of your car? If you have a band A commuting car and a band M weekend car, you could easily be emitting twice as much CO2 with the car that attracts no tax as you do with the car that you have to pay GBP460 for the year on. Car road tax isn't determined by the amount you pollute (or emit CO2). Indeed if it was, vehicles built prior to 1973 would attract huge rates of tax, instead of being exempt. Another Road Tax Denial fallacy. -- Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk |
#119
|
|||
|
|||
two-wheeled scum murdering pedestrians again
On 08/04/2011 22:47, Tony Dragon wrote:
On 08/04/2011 22:37, Tony Raven wrote: Tony wrote: On 08/04/2011 19:56, Tony Raven wrote: Tony wrote: On 08/04/2011 19:11, Tony Raven wrote: Tony wrote: There are no exceptions - merely a tax rate of zero. So in that case he pays zero ( one of the exceptions) Why is it an exception? Is the zero rated band of income tax an exception (hardly since it applies to everyone with income) or just a zero rated tax band? . Good so you agree that the payment is a pre-requisite for using the vehicle on the road (being allowed use the road0 No because for quite a few models of car there is no payment. Having a VED disc is a prerequisite but it needn't cost you anything. Wriggle, wriggle The most honest exposition of your position yet. Do you require a spade for your digging? No thanks, your doing quite well with it yourself. I'm not the one in the hole. Seems like Mr Raving wants to compete with those miners in Chile. -- Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk |
#120
|
|||
|
|||
two-wheeled scum murdering pedestrians again
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 22:47:30 +0100
Tony Dragon wrote: I'm not the one in the hole. You just act like you /are/ the hole sometimes. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The wages of the roadie scum on RBT | Andre Jute[_2_] | Techniques | 17 | April 23rd 09 11:10 PM |
Patriots Confront Terrorist Neo-Con Leader - any here in Australia or just coward sheeple mass-murdering Nazi boy drummers? | [email protected] | Australia | 5 | October 5th 06 02:40 PM |
Thieving Scum :-( | Simon Connell | UK | 3 | July 21st 04 10:54 PM |
Vile Scum of the Day | W K | UK | 40 | December 4th 03 11:51 PM |
dirty scum | Temp3st | UK | 11 | September 12th 03 12:04 PM |