A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Techniques
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The Dancing Chain, by Frank Berto



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 4th 04, 09:28 PM
Frank Krygowski
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The Dancing Chain, by Frank Berto

John McGraw wrote:

I'd use log
log paper to day to know where my cross over redundant gears are, if I
could find the graph paper. Any suggestions on where to find it would
be deeply appreciated. John


Google "Graph paper software" and you'll find several programs that will
print the stuff out.

But these days, when I want to do a gear chart, I use a spreadsheet
package. Depending what you need, you may find it better to set up an
extra column containing the logarithm of the gear inches, but simply
plotting the gear inches on a logarithmic axis may be fine.

--
--------------------+
Frank Krygowski [To reply, remove rodent and vegetable dot com,
replace with cc.ysu dot edu]

Ads
  #2  
Old December 6th 04, 12:12 AM
Amit
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Frank Krygowski wrote in message ...
John McGraw wrote:

I'd use log
log paper to day to know where my cross over redundant gears are, if I
could find the graph paper. Any suggestions on where to find it would
be deeply appreciated. John


Google "Graph paper software" and you'll find several programs that will
print the stuff out.

But these days, when I want to do a gear chart, I use a spreadsheet
package. Depending what you need, you may find it better to set up an
extra column containing the logarithm of the gear inches, but simply
plotting the gear inches on a logarithmic axis may be fine.


okay, i don't understand the origianl need for log plots of gear
inches. i've seen how the spacing of gears on a single chainring for a
typical bike is somewhat logarithmic.

perhaps you'd want the gears across the entire range to be lined up on
the log plot as a magical ideal, but that seems pretty arbitrary.

i don't see how a log plot helps you elimintate duplicate gears in a
way that you couldn't do on a linear plot, or even by simply
eyeballing the gear chart.

-Amit
  #3  
Old December 6th 04, 04:23 AM
Frank Krygowski
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Amit wrote:


okay, i don't understand the origianl need for log plots of gear
inches. i've seen how the spacing of gears on a single chainring for a
typical bike is somewhat logarithmic.

perhaps you'd want the gears across the entire range to be lined up on
the log plot as a magical ideal, but that seems pretty arbitrary.

i don't see how a log plot helps you elimintate duplicate gears in a
way that you couldn't do on a linear plot, or even by simply
eyeballing the gear chart.


The key is that on a log plot, equal percent changes show up as equal
distances between points.

If you felt that each gear change should have the same effect (say,
reducing your gear ratio by 5%) then you could plot different cog
combinations until you achieved equal spacing on a log plot. If you
felt you wanted greater spacing in the low gears and finer spacing in
the high gears, you could verify that as well.

If you plotted things on a linear scale, or just looked at the number of
gear inches, you might think shifting from a 100 inch gear to a 95 inch
gear would feel the same as shifting from a 30 inch to a 25 inch. But
in practice, the former is a fine adjustment, the latter is a pretty big
jump.

Of course, many people rode far, fast and long without giving this a
thought. It all depended on how much you were into the technology and
the numbers.

--
--------------------+
Frank Krygowski [To reply, remove rodent and vegetable dot com,
replace with cc.ysu dot edu]

  #4  
Old December 6th 04, 09:33 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Frank Krygowski wrote:
Amit wrote:


okay, i don't understand the origianl need for log plots of gear
inches. i've seen how the spacing of gears on a single chainring

for a
typical bike is somewhat logarithmic.

perhaps you'd want the gears across the entire range to be lined up

on
the log plot as a magical ideal, but that seems pretty arbitrary.

i don't see how a log plot helps you elimintate duplicate gears in

a
way that you couldn't do on a linear plot, or even by simply
eyeballing the gear chart.


The key is that on a log plot, equal percent changes show up as equal


distances between points.

If you felt that each gear change should have the same effect (say,
reducing your gear ratio by 5%) then you could plot different cog
combinations until you achieved equal spacing on a log plot. If you
felt you wanted greater spacing in the low gears and finer spacing in


the high gears, you could verify that as well.

If you plotted things on a linear scale, or just looked at the number

of
gear inches, you might think shifting from a 100 inch gear to a 95

inch
gear would feel the same as shifting from a 30 inch to a 25 inch.

But
in practice, the former is a fine adjustment, the latter is a pretty

big
jump.

Of course, many people rode far, fast and long without giving this a
thought. It all depended on how much you were into the technology

and
the numbers.

--
--------------------+
Frank Krygowski [To reply, remove rodent and vegetable dot com,
replace with cc.ysu dot edu]


It's not as important today as 20+ more years ago, when 5 or 6 speeds
were all that were available. It's also not at all difficult to do if
log paper is used. What I was saying is that it's still a good way look
at ones gearing. So far spread sheets baffle me. They sure don't look
like any math I've ever done. Also my peculiar mind has to see or
imagine seeing something in order to understand it. Words just float
around in empty space.
Happy Holidays, John

  #5  
Old December 6th 04, 10:24 PM
gwhite
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Amit wrote:

Frank Krygowski wrote in message ...
John McGraw wrote:

I'd use log
log paper to day to know where my cross over redundant gears are, if I
could find the graph paper. Any suggestions on where to find it would
be deeply appreciated. John


Google "Graph paper software" and you'll find several programs that will
print the stuff out.

But these days, when I want to do a gear chart, I use a spreadsheet
package. Depending what you need, you may find it better to set up an
extra column containing the logarithm of the gear inches, but simply
plotting the gear inches on a logarithmic axis may be fine.


okay, i don't understand the origianl need for log plots of gear
inches. i've seen how the spacing of gears on a single chainring for a
typical bike is somewhat logarithmic.


When changing gears, the difference your legs feel is a "percent change
difference"; so the problem by definition is a geometric sequence. A geometric
sequence, which is exponential, of course becomes linear when transformed by the
log function. This is where the utility of log-paper comes in, although I've
never bothered myself.

perhaps you'd want the gears across the entire range to be lined up on
the log plot as a magical ideal, but that seems pretty arbitrary.


Well sort of--it isn't a law, nor is it exactly acheivable with only rational
fractions available. But the rule of thumb is to determine what increments feel
good (for example, I choose 6 gStep 9% as desirable), and try to approximate
from that specification. Once that is determined, synthesis starts from
there--although we are obviously constrained by what actual hardware is
available.

Some folks do choose to intentionally distort this rule by "stretching the
lows," for example. That is, they figure they only need to "bail out" on a rare
basis, and don't wish to sacrifice step size. As the number of speeds increases,
obviously there are less trade offs.

i don't see how a log plot helps you elimintate duplicate gears in a
way that you couldn't do on a linear plot, or even by simply
eyeballing the gear chart.


There is no presumption to eliminate duplicates, except for certain designs.
Obviously the so-called "half-step" *requires* interleaving (half-steps are
rarely used anymore). For the so-called "crossover," the point is to actually
have a duplicate available. IOW, the same percentage step is available whether
you cross to other ring, or change only the back. Nowadays, a lot of the
duplicate gear concern is awash with 9sp and 10sp cassettes. It just doesn't
matter for the most part. (Funny how 9&10sp cassettes have helped obsolete
log-paper. Whodda thunk?)
  #6  
Old December 6th 04, 11:25 PM
Sheldon Brown
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quoth Frank Krygowski:

The key is that on a log plot, equal percent changes show up as equal
distances between points.

If you felt that each gear change should have the same effect (say,
reducing your gear ratio by 5%) then you could plot different cog
combinations until you achieved equal spacing on a log plot. If you
felt you wanted greater spacing in the low gears and finer spacing in
the high gears, you could verify that as well.

If you plotted things on a linear scale, or just looked at the number of
gear inches, you might think shifting from a 100 inch gear to a 95 inch
gear would feel the same as shifting from a 30 inch to a 25 inch. But
in practice, the former is a fine adjustment, the latter is a pretty big
jump.


That would be true if we cycled in a vacuum, opposed by linear
frictional resistances only.

However, the non-linearity of air resistance cancels this out to a
considerable extent.

See: http://sheldonbrown.com/gear-theory.html#progression

Sheldon "Pear Shaped" Brown
+------------------------------------------+
| The lower your gear, the more of your |
| riding time will be spent going uphill. |
+------------------------------------------+
Harris Cyclery, West Newton, Massachusetts
Phone 617-244-9772 FAX 617-244-1041
http://harriscyclery.com
Hard-to-find parts shipped Worldwide
http://captainbike.com http://sheldonbrown.com

  #7  
Old December 7th 04, 02:39 AM
Frank Krygowski
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Sheldon Brown wrote:

Quoth Frank Krygowski:

The key is that on a log plot, equal percent changes show up as equal
distances between points.

If you felt that each gear change should have the same effect (say,
reducing your gear ratio by 5%) then you could plot different cog
combinations until you achieved equal spacing on a log plot. If you
felt you wanted greater spacing in the low gears and finer spacing in
the high gears, you could verify that as well.

If you plotted things on a linear scale, or just looked at the number
of gear inches, you might think shifting from a 100 inch gear to a 95
inch gear would feel the same as shifting from a 30 inch to a 25
inch. But in practice, the former is a fine adjustment, the latter is
a pretty big jump.



That would be true if we cycled in a vacuum, opposed by linear
frictional resistances only.

However, the non-linearity of air resistance cancels this out to a
considerable extent.

See: http://sheldonbrown.com/gear-theory.html#progression

Sheldon "Pear Shaped" Brown


This may sound like a quibble, but: my descriptions of "fine
adjustment" and "pretty big jump" are correct. The adjustments are as I
describe them, 5% in one case, 17% in the other. What the person is
adjusting _for_ is another matter.

I'm aware, of course, of the variation in air resistance with speed.
That's the reason for the "If" beginning my paragraph above, and the
reason for my saying "If you felt you wanted greater spacing in the low
gears and finer spacing in the high gears, you could verify that as
well." It's perfectly logical to prefer the latter.

My intent is not to act as a proponent for either scheme. My intent is
to point out why log graph paper is a useful tool when designing either
scheme.

--
Frank Krygowski [To reply, remove rodent and vegetable dot com.
Substitute cc dot ysu dot
edu]

  #8  
Old December 7th 04, 04:26 AM
gwhite
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Sheldon Brown wrote:


That would be true if we cycled in a vacuum, opposed by linear
frictional resistances only.

However, the non-linearity of air resistance cancels this out to a
considerable extent.



Why do you presume the speed changed (or anything else)?
  #9  
Old December 7th 04, 10:36 AM
Robert Chung
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Sheldon Brown wrote:

See: http://sheldonbrown.com/gear-theory.html#progression


Hmmm. Within that same page, I disagree with much of the stuff you've
written in this topic:
http://sheldonbrown.com/gear-theory.html#cadence, but particularly with
this:

"For the cyclist who wants to maximize efficiency, there is a particular
combination of cadence and resistance that will produce the most power
with the least stress on the body. [...] The idea of gears is to select
the gear in which this combination of cadence and resistance is met.
Depending on the wind, grade and surface conditions, your speed may be
faster or slower, but theoretically your legs should always be pushing
against the same resistance, and spinning the cranks at the same cadence."


--
Still a proud member of the reality-based community.


  #10  
Old December 7th 04, 03:42 PM
Jeff Starr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 10:36:30 +0100, "Robert Chung"
wrote:

Sheldon Brown wrote:

See: http://sheldonbrown.com/gear-theory.html#progression


Hmmm. Within that same page, I disagree with much of the stuff you've
written in this topic:
http://sheldonbrown.com/gear-theory.html#cadence, but particularly with
this:

"For the cyclist who wants to maximize efficiency, there is a particular
combination of cadence and resistance that will produce the most power
with the least stress on the body. [...] The idea of gears is to select
the gear in which this combination of cadence and resistance is met.
Depending on the wind, grade and surface conditions, your speed may be
faster or slower, but theoretically your legs should always be pushing
against the same resistance, and spinning the cranks at the same cadence."


And I disagree with you, so? it might be helpful if you explained
what/why you disagree with the above.
It makes sense to me.


Life is Good!
Jeff
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Dancing Chain, by Frank Berto Frank Krygowski Racing 0 December 5th 04 01:02 AM
The Dancing Chain, by Frank Berto Frank Krygowski Racing 0 December 4th 04 09:28 PM
The Dancing Chain, by Frank Berto [email protected] Techniques 0 December 4th 04 12:31 AM
The Dancing Chain (by Frank Berto) Steven L. Sheffield Marketplace 0 August 15th 04 03:37 PM
Too-Wide Chain: More Likely To Break? (Pete Cresswell) Techniques 12 December 21st 03 05:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.