|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Another useless gimic?
|
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Another useless gimic?
"Maurizio" wrote in message ... "Alan Walker" ha scritto nel messaggio om... Saw a very expensive frame in my local bicycle shop with large diamond-shaped holes in the chainstays. The carbon fibre tubes split into two, then rejoined, leaving a hole. Colnago C40 HP, I suppose. I think it would require spin of election campaign manager proportions to justify that one. Not that difficult: it could be enough something like: "the new diamond-shaped chainstays absorb 25% more road bump than the traditional ones, weighting 10% less and giving 30% more stiffness to the bottom bracket" Nearly right (they oughta give you a job!): "The Diamond HP (High Power) Stays Engineered Carbon Fiber Diamond shape: Enhances the Compliant Smooth Ride, Decreases Power Robbing Lateral Flex, Dampens Vibration". Here's a translation: "Yikes! All bikes that meet UCI codes look practically identical! The paint-job is already as loud as we can make it while still being able to sell the damn thing - how the hell can we get some brand-differentiation in there? Ok, let's look back to the golden age of cycling when people drilled holes in every part of the bike except the tyre. Holes, holes, holes... ...got it: We'll do it to the chainstay. Woo-Hoo! Vive la difference!" Pitiful. Worthless. Tim. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.525 / Virus Database: 322 - Release Date: 09/10/03 |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Another useless gimic?
"Maurizio" wrote in message ... "Alan Walker" ha scritto nel messaggio om... Saw a very expensive frame in my local bicycle shop with large diamond-shaped holes in the chainstays. The carbon fibre tubes split into two, then rejoined, leaving a hole. Colnago C40 HP, I suppose. I think it would require spin of election campaign manager proportions to justify that one. Not that difficult: it could be enough something like: "the new diamond-shaped chainstays absorb 25% more road bump than the traditional ones, weighting 10% less and giving 30% more stiffness to the bottom bracket" Nearly right (they oughta give you a job!): "The Diamond HP (High Power) Stays Engineered Carbon Fiber Diamond shape: Enhances the Compliant Smooth Ride, Decreases Power Robbing Lateral Flex, Dampens Vibration". Here's a translation: "Yikes! All bikes that meet UCI codes look practically identical! The paint-job is already as loud as we can make it while still being able to sell the damn thing - how the hell can we get some brand-differentiation in there? Ok, let's look back to the golden age of cycling when people drilled holes in every part of the bike except the tyre. Holes, holes, holes... ...got it: We'll do it to the chainstay. Woo-Hoo! Vive la difference!" Pitiful. Worthless. Tim. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.525 / Virus Database: 322 - Release Date: 09/10/03 |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Another useless gimic?
I have spoken to 3 people who have ridden the old C40 and the newer
C40-HP. All said that the HP chainstays made a noticeable difference in improving the ride but thought the benefits would be most marked in bigger riders. Make of that what you will! -- -------------------------- Posted via cyclingforums.com http://www.cyclingforums.com |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Another useless gimic?
I have spoken to 3 people who have ridden the old C40 and the newer
C40-HP. All said that the HP chainstays made a noticeable difference in improving the ride but thought the benefits would be most marked in bigger riders. Make of that what you will! -- -------------------------- Posted via cyclingforums.com http://www.cyclingforums.com |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Another useless gimic?
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 01:35:27 +0000, Alan Walker wrote:
Saw a very expensive frame in my local bicycle shop with large diamond-shaped holes in the chainstays. The carbon fibre tubes split into two, then rejoined, leaving a hole. I saw one advertised with an "elastomer insert" stuffed into such a hole. Is this the same bike? The "elastomer" was kind of transparent. -- David L. Johnson __o | Deserves death! I daresay he does. Many that live deserve _`\(,_ | death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to (_)/ (_) | them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement. -- J. R. R. Tolkien |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Another useless gimic?
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 01:35:27 +0000, Alan Walker wrote:
Saw a very expensive frame in my local bicycle shop with large diamond-shaped holes in the chainstays. The carbon fibre tubes split into two, then rejoined, leaving a hole. I saw one advertised with an "elastomer insert" stuffed into such a hole. Is this the same bike? The "elastomer" was kind of transparent. -- David L. Johnson __o | Deserves death! I daresay he does. Many that live deserve _`\(,_ | death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to (_)/ (_) | them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement. -- J. R. R. Tolkien |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Another useless gimic?
(Alan Walker) wrote in message . com...
Saw a very expensive frame in my local bicycle shop with large diamond-shaped holes in the chainstays. The carbon fibre tubes split into two, then rejoined, leaving a hole. [snip] Dear Alan, Below is a page that explains what advantages the Colnago engineers believe their odd-looking frame provides, specifically less lateral and vertical flexing. I don't know whether it actually does so or if such stiffness matters, but I was surprised by how much apparently ignorant scoffing your post generated. You'd think that rec.bicycles.tech posters would be curious about a weird new frame from a respected manufacturer. Anyone who wants to pursue the matter will find it easiest to search for colnago and "high-power" with google, that being the name Colnago uses for this funny-looking frame with a sort of diamond-cutout spliced into the chain-stay. Me, I ride a Schwinn. http://www.trialtir-usa.com/2003-col...0-testing.html Me, I ride a Schwinn, but I'd love to know what someone like Jobst Brandt thinks of this. In the 1970's, I could reel off the objections to the absurd monoshock designs in observed trials motorcycles. In fact, I still ride a 1976 Honda TL, possibly the last non-monoshock ever made. Carl Fogel |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Another useless gimic?
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 19:51:48 +0000, Carl Fogel wrote:
Below is a page that explains what advantages the Colnago engineers believe their odd-looking frame provides, specifically less lateral and vertical flexing. I don't know whether it actually does so or if such stiffness matters, but I was surprised by how much apparently ignorant scoffing your post generated. You'd think that rec.bicycles.tech posters would be curious about a weird new frame from a respected manufacturer. Well, Colnago has also marketed frames with creased main tubes. As far as this goes, according to the website you mention: http://www.trialtir-usa.com/2003-col...0-testing.html Indeed has a chart purporting to list the 5% increase in vertical flex. But the scale is revealing, it gives flex in millimeters X 10e4. At the highest mass tested, 100Kg, the new frame flexed not 600 mm, but 600/10000 mm. .06mm. The old frame flexed 580/10000 mm, .058mm That .002mm difference is what they are advertising. -- David L. Johnson __o | And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all _`\(,_ | mysteries, and all knowledge; and though I have all faith, so (_)/ (_) | that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing. [1 Corinth. 13:2] |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Are disc-brakes just a gimic? | Mike1 | Techniques | 11 | August 13th 04 04:38 PM |
Another useless gimic? | Alan Walker | Techniques | 58 | October 18th 03 02:15 AM |