|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists ignoring signs get a ticket
On 16/11/2011 20:46, Peter Keller wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:25:45 +0000, Judith wrote: On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 01:08:09 +0000 (UTC), Peter Keller wrote: On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:22:41 +0000, Judith wrote: Please do not believe the ****e which Mason posts. I am not taking any ****ing orders from ****ing you about whatever ****ing thing I will ****ing believe in from whatever ****ing source. I forget that English is not your first language: OED Please, adv : Used in polite request So "please do not" is not actually a "****ing order" It bloody well is, especially coming from ****ing you! I assess posts, sayings, opinions etc independently of pressure from spoilsport powerhungry feminazis. *Language*, Timothy! |
Ads |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists ignoring signs get a ticket
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:46:04 +0000 (UTC), Peter Keller
wrote: On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:25:45 +0000, Judith wrote: On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 01:08:09 +0000 (UTC), Peter Keller wrote: On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:22:41 +0000, Judith wrote: Please do not believe the ****e which Mason posts. I am not taking any ****ing orders from ****ing you about whatever ****ing thing I will ****ing believe in from whatever ****ing source. I forget that English is not your first language: OED Please, adv : Used in polite request So "please do not" is not actually a "****ing order" It bloody well is, especially coming from ****ing you! I assess posts, sayings, opinions etc independently of pressure from spoilsport powerhungry feminazis. You should not get so up tight about things you know - you may suffer another heart attack. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists ignoring signs get a ticket
On Nov 14, 10:48*pm, Alex Heney wrote:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:22:41 +0000, Judith wrote: On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 04:43:02 -0800 (PST), Simon Mason wrote: On Nov 13, 12:31*pm, "Lieutenant Scott" wrote: On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:13:54 -0000, Simon Mason wrote: On Nov 13, 11:41 am, "Lieutenant Scott" wrote: - Show quoted text - No you are helping a criminal escape punishment. By preventing the crime, not moving it. *Twit. *READ what I write. The police will prevent the crime of speeding for good by nabbing them enough times to get them off the road where they can do the public no harm. Warning them is obstruction, pure and simple. No, they will nab them enough times to make them buy a satnav with a speed camera database - or at least that's what happened to me. If you drive in France with it turned on, you will get fined for that. Please do not believe the ****e which Mason posts. I understand that systems which detect the radar speed traps are illegal in France; BUT not the Garmin which is just telling you of the locations. If I am wrong - I would like to see something authoritative - other than the musing of the ****wit Simple Simon No, you are correct. http://www.theaa.com/motoring_advice...ectors-in-fran... -- Alex Heney, Global Villager My software never has bugs. It just develops random features. To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - That is what I understood, yes. The legal blurb which came with my Garmin states that the speed camera warning option that comes bundled with it must be turned OFF while driving in France. Thanks for confirming this. -- Simon Mason |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Apology (Was: Cyclists ignoring signs get a ticket)
Message-ID:
It appears that the above post was an abusive or trolling messsage from judith, a known serial offender. We apologise for any distress this obnoxious message may have caused, it has now been reported to as a violation of their acceptable use policy. This does not preclude additional reports of this abuse, should you feel so motivated. Thank you for your patience during this hopefully brief interruption to your usenet pleasure. -- Mick the Moderator pp. the Hon. Nigel P. Smallpiece (CEO), Knotty Ash Jam Butty Enterprises plc, England |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Apology (Was: Cyclists ignoring signs get a ticket)
Message-ID:
It appears that the above post was an abusive or trolling messsage from judith, a known serial offender. We apologise for any distress this obnoxious message may have caused, it has now been reported to as a violation of their acceptable use policy. This does not preclude additional reports of this abuse, should you feel so motivated. Thank you for your patience during this hopefully brief interruption to your usenet pleasure. -- Mick the Moderator pp. the Hon. Nigel P. Smallpiece (CEO), Knotty Ash Jam Butty Enterprises plc, England |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Apology (Was: Cyclists ignoring signs get a ticket)
Message-ID:
It appears that the above post was an abusive or trolling messsage from The Medway Handyman, a known serial offender. We apologise for any distress this obnoxious message may have caused, it has now been reported to http://netreport.virginmedia.com as a violation of their acceptable use policy. This does not preclude additional reports of this abuse, should you feel so motivated. Thank you for your patience during this hopefully brief interruption to your usenet pleasure. -- Mick the Moderator pp. the Hon. Nigel P. Smallpiece (CEO), Knotty Ash Jam Butty Enterprises plc, England |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Apology (Was: Cyclists ignoring signs get a ticket)
Message-ID:
It appears that the above post was an abusive or trolling messsage from judith, a known serial offender. We apologise for any distress this obnoxious message may have caused, it has now been reported to as a violation of their acceptable use policy. This does not preclude additional reports of this abuse, should you feel so motivated. Thank you for your patience during this hopefully brief interruption to your usenet pleasure. -- Mick the Moderator pp. the Hon. Nigel P. Smallpiece (CEO), Knotty Ash Jam Butty Enterprises plc, England |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists ignoring signs get a ticket
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 19:54:42 -0800 (PST), Simon Mason
wrote: On Nov 14, 10:48*pm, Alex Heney wrote: On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:22:41 +0000, Judith wrote: On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 04:43:02 -0800 (PST), Simon Mason wrote: On Nov 13, 12:31*pm, "Lieutenant Scott" wrote: On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:13:54 -0000, Simon Mason wrote: On Nov 13, 11:41 am, "Lieutenant Scott" wrote: - Show quoted text - No you are helping a criminal escape punishment. By preventing the crime, not moving it. *Twit. *READ what I write. The police will prevent the crime of speeding for good by nabbing them enough times to get them off the road where they can do the public no harm. Warning them is obstruction, pure and simple. No, they will nab them enough times to make them buy a satnav with a speed camera database - or at least that's what happened to me. If you drive in France with it turned on, you will get fined for that. Please do not believe the ****e which Mason posts. I understand that systems which detect the radar speed traps are illegal in France; BUT not the Garmin which is just telling you of the locations. If I am wrong - I would like to see something authoritative - other than the musing of the ****wit Simple Simon No, you are correct. http://www.theaa.com/motoring_advice...ectors-in-fran... -- Alex Heney, Global Villager My software never has bugs. It just develops random features. To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - That is what I understood, yes. The legal blurb which came with my Garmin states that the speed camera warning option that comes bundled with it must be turned OFF while driving in France. Thanks for confirming this. Eeerr - I think you have dropped yet another bollock there. I think Alex was not confirming what *you* said at all. "This legislation does not apply to satellite navigation systems (SatNav or GPS). These can tell motorists only the location of fixed speed cameras, data which is already in the public domain." (I've put uk.legal back in for you - it was inadvertently chopped by someone) |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists ignoring signs get a ticket
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:26:47 +0000, Judith wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:46:04 +0000 (UTC), Peter Keller wrote: It bloody well is, especially coming from ****ing you! I assess posts, sayings, opinions etc independently of pressure from spoilsport powerhungry feminazis. You should not get so up tight about things you know - you may suffer another heart attack. That is your hope. Thank you sweety. -- An oft-repeated lie is still a lie. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists ignoring signs get a ticket
On Nov 17, 9:41*pm, Peter Keller wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:26:47 +0000, Judith wrote: On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:46:04 +0000 (UTC), Peter Keller wrote: It bloody well is, especially coming from ****ing you! I assess posts, sayings, opinions etc independently of pressure from spoilsport powerhungry feminazis. You should not get so up tight about things you know - you may suffer another heart attack. That is your hope. Thank you sweety. -- An oft-repeated lie is still a lie. My heart is 100% sound, thanks all the same. -- Simon Mason |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
poor ickle cyclists offended by the signs | Mrcheerful[_2_] | UK | 13 | November 12th 11 02:36 PM |
Crackdown on drivers ignoring no entry signs. | Doug[_12_] | UK | 22 | August 4th 11 11:30 PM |
Crackdown on drivers ignoring no entry signs. | Simon Mason | UK | 1 | July 30th 11 08:43 AM |
Cyclists ignoring dismount signs. | Simon Mason[_4_] | UK | 26 | June 27th 11 11:09 PM |
OT You can put up signs, but these cyclists know better | Mrcheerful[_2_] | UK | 35 | December 8th 10 04:14 PM |