|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Tire size for 180 lb rider
Paul Southworth wrote:
I recently tried the Trek Bontrager Race Lite tires and found they also cut easily and did not get many miles from them. I just dumped my Bontrager Race X-Lites (came with my bike) for Michelin Pro Race. The Bontrager's (700x23) had 2 flats (rear) in 225 miles, and I noticed small splits in the rear tread after 300 mi. (Continental is making these tires for Bontrager, and they are very similar in their design and composition to Conti's GP3000). My experience with the Race X-Lites is not consistant with yours. I believe I had one flat on the rear before wearing it out after 1000 miles or so. Good handling, relatively light, good wear and damage resistance in my book. Downside: Traction is suspect in wet conditions. I like them so much I'm running them on my tandem, where I place a premium on damage resistance. YMMV, Chris Neary "Science, freedom, beauty, adventu what more could you ask of life? Bicycling combined all the elements I loved" - Adapted from a quotation by Charles Lindbergh |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Tire size for 180 lb rider
"Yeah, man, they're CHEN SHINS and they kick ass!"
Actually they're Cheng Shins and they do kick ass, it was UV exposure and not mileage that killed mine. After 8000 miles they still had tread but the sidewalls were badly cracked. -- _______________________ALL AMIGA IN MY MIND_______________________ ------------------"Buddy Holly, the Texas Elvis"------------------ in.edu__________ |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Tire size for 180 lb rider
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Tire size for 180 lb rider
On Sat, 15 May 2004 23:16:25 -0400, Eric S. Sande wrote:
Actually they're Cheng Shins Well EXCUSE me! LOL Shoudda looked at my sidewalls for sp. before posting OMG, we have THREE (count'em) CHENG SHIN apologists in this thread. I think I just felt the earth move... :P |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Tire size for 180 lb rider
Paul Southworth wrote:
I recently tried the Trek Bontrager Race Lite tires and found they also cut easily and did not get many miles from them. I just dumped my Bontrager Race X-Lites (came with my bike) for Michelin Pro Race. The Bontrager's (700x23) had 2 flats (rear) in 225 miles, and I noticed small splits in the rear tread after 300 mi. (Continental is making these tires for Bontrager, and they are very similar in their design and composition to Conti's GP3000). Two additional points I forgot earlier: 1) My tires also developed the small slits on the tread, but they appear to be strictly cosmetic in nature and have not caused any flats (for me). 2) Continental is no longer manufacturing Bontragers. I believe the new manufacturer is Vittoria, but I'm not 100% sure. Chris Neary "Science, freedom, beauty, adventu what more could you ask of life? Bicycling combined all the elements I loved" - Adapted from a quotation by Charles Lindbergh |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Tire size for 180 lb rider
David Kerber wrote:
Absolutely; I want the one which will help me go the fastest. I was assuming that a smaller tire at a higher pressure would have lower resistance than the 25's I'm running right now, which I set up to 120 psi for races (lower for every day). I am aware that a smaller tire at the same pressure will hurt the rolling resistance, not help it. I don't think a smaller tire than a 25 @120psi will bring much improvement in RR, unless your 25s are quite heavy or have stiff casings or lots of Kevlar belting. If you use a smaller tire you'll need more air and I also don't think pressures above 120 psi are going to be useful anywhere but a track. Comfort is important when trying to go fast. So is resistance to pinch flatting. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Tire size for 180 lb rider
"Rick Onanian" wrote in message
On Sat, 15 May 2004 15:25:37 GMT, maxo wrote: On an amusing note, the most durable tires I've ever ridden have been Chen Shins. Now before everyone starts laughing, which is pretty understandable, once must understand that this company is the largest bike tire maker in the world--so their quality spans the spectrum! Anybody who laughs at the statement that Cheng Shin (isn't there a 'g' in there?) tires last forever has never used them. Every one I've ridden refuses to show any wear whatsoever no matter how much riding nor how much abusing is done. The only reason to change them is if you want tires that ride/feel different. They're slightly tougher than cast iron, and slightly lighter. I've never gotten a flat through one, nor worn one visibly. Regulars may recall me pestering people for imformation about tyres a couple of months back. It's taken longer than I planned but I finally got rid of my Cheng Shins! The problem was I also needed other bits and pieces as well so every pay I'd look at my tyres and think, well, it's not like they're actually worn or anything so they can wait. The problem with Cheng Shins is that by that philosophy I'd still be putting off replacing them about three years from now. After much questioning and listening and reading and pondering I bought some Avocet Fasgrips Duro-Plus K 700x32s from the States. They arrived Wednesday and I put them on yesterday. (As an aside, I was very proud of myself given I haven't replaced a bike tyre for at least 25 years. At least now I know I could do it on the road if I had to). Talk about chalk and cheese. I only went for a short test ride because of the foul weather but I swore the bike felt lighter and more lively. Then I wondered if I wasn't just mentally justifying the expense, so I put one of the Cheng Shins on the scales. Bike tyres aren't the easiest things to weigh if you don't have hanging scales but by my estimate my old 700x40s that came with the bike weigh around 680-690 grams each! The Avocets nominally weigh 410 grams each, so I've just reduced the weight of my tyres by over half a kilogram! No wonder they feel lighter and more responsive. Going from 75psi to 90psi thus far doesn't seem to have changed the comfort. The only thing now I'm a tad nervous about is that I used the existing tubes. Because of the weather I couldn't be bothered walking up to the LBS to get replacements. They're also Cheng Shin (they seem to retain pressure OK) but the marking said 700x35-43 so they're a bit over-sized for the 700x32s. They seemed to go in OK but I'll get some new tubes as spares. What are the odds of a pinch flat? Am I asking for trouble? -- A: Top-posters. Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet? |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Tire size for 180 lb rider
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In article , DRS wrote: The only thing now I'm a tad nervous about is that I used the existing tubes. Because of the weather I couldn't be bothered walking up to the LBS to get replacements. They're also Cheng Shin (they seem to retain pressure OK) but the marking said 700x35-43 so they're a bit over-sized for the 700x32s. They seemed to go in OK but I'll get some new tubes as spares. What are the odds of a pinch flat? Am I asking for trouble? _ Bike messengers commonly put in the next size up tube to make the tires more flat proof. The only advantage to using the smaller size tube is that it weighs less. If you got the tire on without pinching the tube or catching it under the bead you're all set. _ Booker C. Bense -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBQLZwxGTWTAjn5N/lAQHtmwP8DMnVdsKTytCGrPh/a34mwekj3b2MMbAp gwVRi9MbR8KcJCAqihShgyFtpIaYJ7aS/U/gMFUtGRjRi+3CjPrxAO6AeeNFj8im /O00vYD3sOu6oOtO9g+dWPxhyBWzqvHxw5qhqdxJl+Hhp3Q4dTG lKo7oxSuHnWBc 0X/AP5O9rj8= =sbN5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Tire size for 180 lb rider
On Thu, 27 May 2004 22:50:45 +0000, Booker C. Bense wrote:
_ Bike messengers commonly put in the next size up tube to make the tires more flat proof. I used to do that myself when messengering--it works great! The only thing to watch out for is the tube folding or creasing upon itself--so make sure you put a little air in it before you tuck it into the tire, then install the second bead, put a few more pounds in the tire, and bounce it a bit to seat everything before pumping up to full pressure. BTW, Cheng Shin makes a whole range of tires and to be sure, some of the "standard issue" ones can be a bit crapola--but I've found some real gems. I've put close to 1500 miles on the Nashbar Prima Plus Kevlars I bought a few months ago, and they're holding up great! One pinch flat--not the tires' fault since I didn't check the pressure before one ride. The ride is quite excellent and supple and you can't beat $10 for a utility tire! When I have 20 bucks or so per wheel to blow, I'll of course look for some Vredsteins or similar on sale, but at the lower price point, gimme Cheng Shins! |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Tire size for 180 lb rider
"DRS" wrote in message ... At least now I know I could do it on the road if I had to). Isn't that illegal? :-) Cheers Peter |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tire damage | Roger Zoul | General | 0 | May 4th 04 10:27 PM |
Tire size for least rolling resistance? | Chris Hansen | General | 6 | April 10th 04 02:03 AM |
Q. Will I benefit from different tire size or type? | Joe Samangitak | General | 15 | August 8th 03 03:38 AM |
correct tire size? | Warren Ginn | General | 4 | July 31st 03 10:26 AM |