|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Bill "Laa laa I'm not listening" Zaumen wrote:
Check out the name. Oh, I forgot - you are too arrogant to follow up anything if somebody else suggests it. What name? I rest my case. Translation: "Laa laa, I'm not listening". Translation - our troll Guy is all in a tither because he's been put in a timeout. I think you're confusing me with someone who gives a toss. If you choose to allow my statements to go by default because you are too arrogant, idle, stupid or confused to rebut them, that is your problem not mine. LOL! Bill, there are so many addies on web sites that there is no need even to try that. I saw this behavior while using an old netscape browser configured to (a) not allow cookies, (b) not run java, (c) not run javascript, (d) not accepting plugins of any time, (e) disabling most of the plugins that came with the browser, and (f) ignoring most web sites as useless trash. I also have never owned a Windows box, and nearly all the "addies" as you call them target that. So the most likely explanation is that it was someone you ****ed off with your incessent bull****. Which leaves the field wide open. Of course, crass ignorance is still a possibility, given that you think an email address is only targeted when served off a Windows box. Or are you so woefully ill-informed that you don't realise that "addy" is a common abbreviation for email address? That time delay is most likely because (as Yahoo's CTO mentioned in a talk I went to a few years ago), that spam is a two-level scam. I know how it works. The point is, the thing most guaranteed to generate spam is an address on a web page. It does not look as if spammers bother overmuch with Usenet these days, it being much easier to scarf up addresses from web forums. The idea that real names in .sigs might be combined with domains from headers and made into email addresses is, I think, a paranoid delusion. Combining the name in my .sig with the domain in the link below it produces a valid email address, and always has, but it has never once been spammed. I'll skip the rest - you obviously don't know what you are talking about. LOL! Says the man who thinks that merely putting your real name in your .sig will generate spam! Guy -- May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting. http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk 88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at Washington University |
Ads |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
An experiment to prove the helmet law proponants RIGHT (or wrong) | David | Recumbent Biking | 65 | December 21st 04 06:42 AM |
published helmet research - not troll | Frank Krygowski | General | 1927 | October 24th 04 06:39 AM |
published helmet research - not troll | Frank Krygowski | Social Issues | 1716 | October 24th 04 06:39 AM |
published helmet research - not troll | Frank Krygowski | Social Issues | 55 | July 1st 04 05:05 AM |
published helmet research - not troll | Frank Krygowski | Techniques | 51 | July 1st 04 05:05 AM |