Another pedestrian mown down by a cyclist that ran away sharpish.

On 18/03/2016 10:25, John Smith wrote:
JNugent wrote:
On 17/03/2016 17:13, John Smith wrote:
JNugent wrote:
On 17/03/2016 16:48, John Smith wrote:
JNugent wrote:
On 17/03/2016 16:28, John Smith wrote:
MrCheerful wrote:

Goodness these cyclists are hard men, aren't they?

http://tinyurl.com/kenthitandrun

Twenty-nine million, nine hundred thousand hits. You ****ing dumb
****. Go and die. Soon.

Hello, Glug. Feeling better yet?

Two canards for the price of one, eh?

Have some orange sauce.

No thanks.

Oh come on...cheer up... the Chancellor was good to you, after all.

LOL !!

You _are_ making a fool of yourself.

Not an erm .. altogether unfamiliar feeling for you.

You'll feel better after the first few doubles, Glug.

I'm feeling better already.

Told you.

How's the head today?

JNugent wrote:

How's the head today?

Great. How's yours?

--
john smith |MA (Hons)|MPhil (Hons)|CAPES (mention très bien)|LLB (Hons)
'It never gets any easier. You just get faster'
(Greg LeMond (1961 - ))

"JNugent" wrote
On 18/03/2016 00:21, TMS320 wrote:
"MrCheerful" wrote

A shopper had to have a brain scan after she was knocked down by a
cyclist
in the city centre and left lying in a pool of blood.

Another example showing the necessity of pedestrian helmets.

Another example showing the contempt that cyclists - including many
posters here - have for pedestrians.

Oh, it is well known that when a pedestrian gets knocked down by a cyclist
it is contempt but when they get knocked down by motorists (sorry, correct
common usage is "by motor vehicles") - in proportionately greater numbers -
it is just "one of those things".

On 18/03/2016 13:54, John Smith wrote:

JNugent wrote:

How's the head today?

Great.

Steady on.

How's yours?

As unintoxicated as usual.

On 18/03/2016 14:30, TMS320 wrote:

"JNugent" wrote
On 18/03/2016 00:21, TMS320 wrote:
"MrCheerful" wrote

A shopper had to have a brain scan after she was knocked down by a
cyclist in the city centre and left lying in a pool of blood.

Another example showing the necessity of pedestrian helmets.

Another example showing the contempt that cyclists - including many
posters here - have for pedestrians.

Oh, it is well known that when a pedestrian gets knocked down by a cyclist
it is contempt but when they get knocked down by motorists (sorry, correct
common usage is "by motor vehicles") - in proportionately greater numbers -
it is just "one of those things".

You would claim that mocking the injured woman by asserting that she
should have worn a helmet is something other than contempt for her and
her injuries, would you?

"JNugent" wrote
On 18/03/2016 14:30, TMS320 wrote:
"JNugent" wrote
On 18/03/2016 00:21, TMS320 wrote:
"MrCheerful" wrote

A shopper had to have a brain scan after she was knocked down by a
cyclist in the city centre and left lying in a pool of blood.

Another example showing the necessity of pedestrian helmets.

Another example showing the contempt that cyclists - including many
posters here - have for pedestrians.

Oh, it is well known that when a pedestrian gets knocked down by a
cyclist
it is contempt but when they get knocked down by motorists (sorry,
correct
common usage is "by motor vehicles") - in proportionately greater
numbers -
it is just "one of those things".

You would claim that mocking the injured woman by asserting that she
should have worn a helmet is something other than contempt for her and her
injuries, would you?

I daresay I could find a post of yours that mocks cyclists for not wearing
helmets.

On 18/03/2016 22:41, TMS320 wrote:
"JNugent" wrote
On 18/03/2016 14:30, TMS320 wrote:
"JNugent" wrote
On 18/03/2016 00:21, TMS320 wrote:
"MrCheerful" wrote

A shopper had to have a brain scan after she was knocked down by a
cyclist in the city centre and left lying in a pool of blood.

Another example showing the necessity of pedestrian helmets.

Another example showing the contempt that cyclists - including many
posters here - have for pedestrians.

Oh, it is well known that when a pedestrian gets knocked down by a
cyclist
it is contempt but when they get knocked down by motorists (sorry,
correct
common usage is "by motor vehicles") - in proportionately greater
numbers -
it is just "one of those things".

You would claim that mocking the injured woman by asserting that she
should have worn a helmet is something other than contempt for her and her
injuries, would you?

I daresay I could find a post of yours that mocks cyclists for not wearing
helmets.

I tell you that you cannot.

I have always supported the right to choose.

I wonder why you thought different?

"JNugent" wrote in message
...
On 18/03/2016 22:41, TMS320 wrote:
"JNugent" wrote
On 18/03/2016 14:30, TMS320 wrote:
"JNugent" wrote
On 18/03/2016 00:21, TMS320 wrote:
"MrCheerful" wrote

A shopper had to have a brain scan after she was knocked down by a
cyclist in the city centre and left lying in a pool of blood.

Another example showing the necessity of pedestrian helmets.

Another example showing the contempt that cyclists - including many
posters here - have for pedestrians.

Oh, it is well known that when a pedestrian gets knocked down by a
cyclist
it is contempt but when they get knocked down by motorists (sorry,
correct
common usage is "by motor vehicles") - in proportionately greater
numbers -
it is just "one of those things".

You would claim that mocking the injured woman by asserting that she
should have worn a helmet is something other than contempt for her and
her
injuries, would you?

I daresay I could find a post of yours that mocks cyclists for not
wearing helmets.

I tell you that you cannot.

I have always supported the right to choose.

I know this. But I daresay I could find a post of yours that mocks cyclists
for not wearing helmets.

I wonder why you thought different?

I wonder why you think your reply is relevant to my words.

On 23/03/2016 08:57, TMS320 wrote:
"JNugent" wrote in message
...
On 18/03/2016 22:41, TMS320 wrote:
"JNugent" wrote
On 18/03/2016 14:30, TMS320 wrote:
"JNugent" wrote
On 18/03/2016 00:21, TMS320 wrote:
"MrCheerful" wrote

A shopper had to have a brain scan after she was knocked down by a
cyclist in the city centre and left lying in a pool of blood.

Another example showing the necessity of pedestrian helmets.

Another example showing the contempt that cyclists - including many
posters here - have for pedestrians.

Oh, it is well known that when a pedestrian gets knocked down by a
cyclist it is contempt but when they get knocked down by motorists
(sorry, correct common usage is "by motor vehicles") - in
proportionately greater numbers - it is just "one of those things".

You would claim that mocking the injured woman by asserting that she
should have worn a helmet is something other than contempt for her and
her injuries, would you?

I daresay I could find a post of yours that mocks cyclists for not
wearing helmets.

I tell you that you cannot.
I have always supported the right to choose.

I know this. But I daresay I could find a post of yours that mocks cyclists
for not wearing helmets.

The Google Archive is at your disposal.

Knock yourself out.

I wonder why you thought different?

I wonder why you think your reply is relevant to my words.

Do you?