Q for Carl Fogel: Are you for or against lynching?

Now that you have educated yourself, please answer the following
questions:

Would you,or would you not support the anti-lynching resolution? Why?

App

"App" wrote:

Now that you have educated yourself, please answer the following
questions:

Would you,or would you not support the anti-lynching resolution? Why?

As my dear, departed grandmother would say, "Oy."

On 16 Jun 2005 07:11:38 -0700, "App"
wrote:

Now that you have educated yourself, please answer the following
questions:

Would you,or would you not support the anti-lynching resolution? Why?

App

Dear App,

I haven't dared to read the resolution, since it's been
explained to me that any failure to endorse it after reading
it would brand me as a racist. What if I failed to measure
up to the loyalty oath committee's standards?

I did peek at Robert Chung's nice state-by-state graph,
broken down into black and other victims, and don't know
whether to praise Colorado for lynching only "other" victims
(most likely Mexican-Americans, Italian-Americans, and
immigrants from Central Europe) or to wonder what the
powerful Colorado Klan members were doing in the 1930's.

Cheers,

Carl Fogel

writes:

On 16 Jun 2005 07:11:38 -0700, "App"
wrote:

Now that you have educated yourself, please answer the following
questions:

Would you,or would you not support the anti-lynching resolution? Why?

App


I haven't dared to read the resolution, since it's been
explained to me that any failure to endorse it after reading
it would brand me as a racist. What if I failed to measure
up to the loyalty oath committee's standards?

Good god you are full of **** Mr. Fogel!

Do you care to share the conversation from which your delusion
derives?

I did peek at Robert Chung's nice state-by-state graph,
broken down into black and other victims, and don't know
whether to praise Colorado for lynching only "other" victims
(most likely Mexican-Americans, Italian-Americans, and
immigrants from Central Europe) or to wonder what the
powerful Colorado Klan members were doing in the 1930's.

You forgot the Chinese.

On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 14:18:50 -0500, Jim Smith
wrote:

writes:

On 16 Jun 2005 07:11:38 -0700, "App"
wrote:

Now that you have educated yourself, please answer the following
questions:

Would you,or would you not support the anti-lynching resolution? Why?

App


I haven't dared to read the resolution, since it's been
explained to me that any failure to endorse it after reading
it would brand me as a racist. What if I failed to measure
up to the loyalty oath committee's standards?

Good god you are full of **** Mr. Fogel!

Do you care to share the conversation from which your delusion
derives?


Dear Jim,

Here you go:

Jim Smith wrote:

# http://bokonon.metapath.org/l.html
#
# Seems like signing on would be a no-brainer. Unless one
# was a racist.

Cheers,

Carl Fogel

writes:

On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 14:18:50 -0500, Jim Smith
wrote:

writes:

On 16 Jun 2005 07:11:38 -0700, "App"
wrote:

Now that you have educated yourself, please answer the following
questions:

Would you,or would you not support the anti-lynching resolution? Why?

App


I haven't dared to read the resolution, since it's been
explained to me that any failure to endorse it after reading
it would brand me as a racist. What if I failed to measure
up to the loyalty oath committee's standards?

Good god you are full of **** Mr. Fogel!

Do you care to share the conversation from which your delusion
derives?


Dear Jim,

Here you go:

Jim Smith wrote:

# http://bokonon.metapath.org/l.html
#
# Seems like signing on would be a no-brainer. Unless one
# was a racist.

Aha!. It IS as I suspected. You ARE a doddering fool!

Oh well, best you get back to your spreadsheets and calculators.

Oh, and take your affected salutations and shove 'em up your ass.

"Jim Smith" wrote in message
...
writes:
Aha!. It IS as I suspected. You ARE a doddering fool!

Oh well, best you get back to your spreadsheets and calculators.

Oh, and take your affected salutations and shove 'em up your ass.

Making new friends?

On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 14:58:12 -0700, "Frank Drackman"
wrote:


"Jim Smith" wrote in message
...
writes:
Aha!. It IS as I suspected. You ARE a doddering fool!

Oh well, best you get back to your spreadsheets and calculators.

Oh, and take your affected salutations and shove 'em up your ass.

Making new friends?


Dear Frank,

The quoting 's ended up a bit confused, so I'll point out
that the three lines above your wry query were from Jim, not
me:

"Aha!. It IS as I suspected. You ARE a doddering fool!"

"Oh well, best you get back to your spreadsheets and
calculators."

"Oh, and take your affected salutations and shove 'em up
your ass."

Such closely reasoned arguments always bear repeating.

Cheers,

Carl Fogel

writes:

On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 14:58:12 -0700, "Frank Drackman"
wrote:


"Jim Smith" wrote in message
...
writes:
Aha!. It IS as I suspected. You ARE a doddering fool!

Oh well, best you get back to your spreadsheets and calculators.

Oh, and take your affected salutations and shove 'em up your ass.

Making new friends?


Dear Frank,

The quoting 's ended up a bit confused, so I'll point out
that the three lines above your wry query were from Jim, not
me:

"Aha!. It IS as I suspected. You ARE a doddering fool!"

"Oh well, best you get back to your spreadsheets and
calculators."

"Oh, and take your affected salutations and shove 'em up
your ass."

Such closely reasoned arguments always bear repeating.


Coming full circle to where we started, I will point out that those
are not arguments either. Not that I think that will stop you from
caiming they are. Moron.

wrote in message
...

Dear Frank,

The quoting 's ended up a bit confused, so I'll point out
that the three lines above your wry query were from Jim, not
me:


Correct as usual, sorry for my mistake