Long Chain, Les Wear?

On 11/18/2008 8:54 AM landotter wrote:

On Nov 18, 10:15 am, slide wrote:
As I mentioned, I just got a Rans CF bike and am enjoying it quite a
bit. A friend of mine got his last spring. So far he has about 2,500
miles on it (4.000 kms).

He mentioned that the Rans doesn't wear chains or sprockets like
conventional bikes. He said he has no appreciable chain wear over that
period where he'd have at least detectable wear and maybe a new chain
needed if it were a conventional bike. He said the reason was the longer
chain meant less stress per link thus less wear thus the entire drive
train lasts longer.


Once people start reclining and riding--the brain is the first thing
to suffer. ;-) My guess would be that a wear cycle on a chain would
consist of going around the front and rear sprockets once. The flexing
being what abrades the internals of the chain with whatever grit it's
managed to pick up. Longer chain, fewer wear cycles per mile. That's
my steaming turd of an opinion and I'm sticking to it!

Spoken like a man who knows his own mind.

Who's Les Wear?

--
Mike "Rocket J Squirrel"
Bend, Oregon