|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Weight Considerations: Road Vs. Mountain
Simon Brooke wrote: I can't imagine 'needing' 28s, at least not for riding on tarmac. They're huge, and will have a horrible effect on handling. 23 is enough for anyone. Huge? I think we are comparing skinny and super skinny. Most 28s do not even measure 28... more like 25 (a mere inch of width). And how do they have a horrible effect on handling? I haven't noticed that the motorcycle riders with fat tires complain about the handling... as they scrape their knee on the ground through the turns. The wider contact patch will improve traction in turns... and if there is any roughness I'd certainly feel more secure on the wider tire. They also have lower rolling resistance... plus they protect the rim better when hitting potholes. The only down side is a few extra grams of weight and slightly greater aero resistance. For a heavy rider who is just starting I see no point in going narrower than 28s. As for the OP's original question, I think a normal road bike in the $500-$800 range would be fine...23-25 lbs. They do not emphasize light weight so much, so the parts tend to be pretty durable. Make sure you get a proper fit... and like others have mentioned, get sturdy wheels and 28mm (at least) tires. In my experience the cheap wheels which have 32-36 spokes are not tensioned properly from the factory. The back wheel especially is undertensioned, which eventually leads to spokes breaking on the left (non-drive) side. Once you get them tensioned properly, they are fine though. So I'd advise having someone "tune" the wheels right away, if you don't feel able to do it yourself. |
Ads |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Weight Considerations: Road Vs. Mountain
Ron Ruff wrote:
: Simon Brooke wrote: : : I can't imagine 'needing' 28s, at least not for riding on tarmac. : They're huge, and will have a horrible effect on handling. 23 is : enough for anyone. : : Huge? I think we are comparing skinny and super skinny. Most 28s do : not even measure 28... more like 25 (a mere inch of width). I have some 26s I got from Performancebike. Are they more like 23s? (no). : : And how do they have a horrible effect on handling? I haven't noticed : that the motorcycle riders with fat tires complain about the : handling... as they scrape their knee on the ground through the : turns. The wider contact patch will improve traction in turns... and : if there : is any roughness I'd certainly feel more secure on the wider tire. : They also have lower rolling resistance... plus they protect the rim : better when hitting potholes. The only down side is a few extra : grams of : weight and slightly greater aero resistance. For a heavy rider who is : just starting I see no point in going narrower than 28s. : : As for the OP's original question, I think a normal road bike in the : $500-$800 range would be fine...23-25 lbs. They do not emphasize : light weight so much, so the parts tend to be pretty durable. Make : sure you : get a proper fit... and like others have mentioned, get sturdy wheels : and 28mm (at least) tires. : : In my experience the cheap wheels which have 32-36 spokes are not : tensioned properly from the factory. The back wheel especially is : undertensioned, which eventually leads to spokes breaking on the left : (non-drive) side. Once you get them tensioned properly, they are fine : though. So I'd advise having someone "tune" the wheels right away, if : you don't feel able to do it yourself. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Weight Considerations: Road Vs. Mountain
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Weight Considerations: Road Vs. Mountain
Qui si parla Campagnolo wrote:
a road bike that weighed 360 pounds. And y'all are complaining about how heavy walmart bikes are. Brings new meaning to the phrase "rock 'n' roll"! |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Weight Considerations: Road Vs. Mountain
Simon Brooke wrote:
in message .com, rdclark ') wrote: I would still recommend buying a bike with sufficient tire clearance for 28's. To need it and discover you don't have it would be unpleasant. I can't imagine 'needing' 28s, at least not for riding on tarmac. They're huge, and will have a horrible effect on handling. 23 is enough for anyone. Skinny tires will have slightly less rolling resistance because of their higher inflation pressure. They also have a bit less aero drag at high speeds. Both of these effects are quite small. I find the handling of wider tires to be slightly better because with lower pressure they tend to hop less over road imperfections and stay in contact better in turns (is there any other "handling" issue other than hard cornering?). Wider tires protect rims from road hazards -- particularly potholes. This may be a big deal, particularly if you ride a lot in the rain and/or dark. The difference between 23mm and 28mm tires is not very noticeable, I frequently switch between those sizes. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Weight Considerations: Road Vs. Mountain
On 8 Oct 2005 06:33:47 -0700, "Qui si parla Campagnolo"
wrote: I just built some wheels for a rider of a road bike that weighed 360 pounds. If the bike is proper, your weight is not a concern. What did you use for the wheels? 36, 40, 48? Which rim? Jasper |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Weight Considerations: Road Vs. Mountain
Qui si parla Campagnolo wrote:
I just built some wheels for a rider of a road bike that weighed 360 pounds. If the bike is proper, your weight is not a concern. Bicycling Mag did an article on riders who are roughly 400 lbs (IIRC). I've seen riders on trails near here who must be there or close. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Weight Considerations: Road Vs. Mountain
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Weight Considerations: Road Vs. Mountain
"Ken Pisichko" wrote in message ... Peter B wrote: Nah, nah, nah nah.. Is this helpful or is it blatant one-upmanship? Elaborate if you feel it is necessary, otherwise just be silent and let others give advice that the OP can use ;-) Sorry Ma'am. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Weight Considerations: Road Vs. Mountain
Jasper Janssen wrote: On 8 Oct 2005 06:33:47 -0700, "Qui si parla Campagnolo" wrote: I just built some wheels for a rider of a road bike that weighed 360 pounds. If the bike is proper, your weight is not a concern. What did you use for the wheels? 36, 40, 48? Which rim? Jasper Velocity Dyad, 40/4cross rear, 36/3cross front, XT tandem hubset, spaced to 135mm. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cheat Mountain Challenge Ride Report (2005/09/25) | Chris BeHanna | General | 0 | September 30th 05 05:19 AM |
Science Proves Mountain Biking Is More Harmful Than Hiking | Stephen Baker | Mountain Biking | 18 | July 16th 04 04:28 AM |
Mike Vandeman | qa2 | Mountain Biking | 26 | November 18th 03 12:16 PM |
More Hate Mail from a Typical Mountain Biker | Stephen Baker | Mountain Biking | 11 | October 26th 03 05:14 AM |
Braking while turning | [email protected] | Techniques | 45 | August 1st 03 06:56 PM |