|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Phil, Squid-in-Training wrote:
"Ride-A-Lot" wrote in message ... G.T. wrote: "Ride-A-Lot" wrote in message ... Phil, Squid-in-Training wrote: The magnesium lowers of my 2003 Manitou Skareb Comp had begun to crack last year, about 6 months before I stopped riding it. I've kept it stashed away for a while until today, when I was cleaning my room and found the lowers. I gave the legs a light (maybe 2.5-4lb) squeeze, and they snapped. Although I didn't mean to snap them, they lent some interesting insight into their failure. snip extensive research Dude, way too much analytical time on your hands! You forgot to do a gas chromatograph test on the magnesium dust. That should give you the exact compound ingredients. If that happened to me, I wouldn't waste time analyzing it. I'd just buy a new fork and ride. That's a pretty lackadaisical attititude towards something as important as a front fork. I quit working at Answer when they had two rounds of recalls around 1994. I saw a couple of pictures of riders' faces after their forks catastrophically failed. They weren't pretty. GT Why is it "lackadaisical"? Because I would rather ride than figuring out what to do with an obviously busted fork? I didn't say go and buy another Manitou. I'm a mechanical engineering student. The post was written more for rec.bike.tech, but I guess I won't lose the group next time with my techno babble. Well, that explains a lot. I think GeeDub is a mech eng, too. But I don't remember him using techno babble. -- o-o-o-o Ride-A-Lot o-o-o-o www.schnauzers.ws |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Nah, that stuff is all basic materials science/machine design stuff. I
was about to do it for him until I kept reading and saw he did it himself. Yay ME students! Hehe... I was hoping you'd notice. However, I do believe extensive research is needed to determine the contents of that ziploc baggie... LOL... if you really want to know, they're pumpkin seeds. http://plaza.ufl.edu/phillee/rbt/itspumpkinseedsduh.jpg -- Phil, Squid-in-Training |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Phil, Squid-in-Training wrote:
Nah, that stuff is all basic materials science/machine design stuff. I was about to do it for him until I kept reading and saw he did it himself. Yay ME students! Hehe... I was hoping you'd notice. However, I do believe extensive research is needed to determine the contents of that ziploc baggie... LOL... if you really want to know, they're pumpkin seeds. http://plaza.ufl.edu/phillee/rbt/itspumpkinseedsduh.jpg I think you just squashed everyone's hopes. Like a pumpkin! -- o-o-o-o Ride-A-Lot o-o-o-o www.schnauzers.ws |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Any recourse via Manitou ? Hoping my old trusty SX-R will give me another
couple of years... "Phil, Squid-in-Training" wrote in message ... "justen" wrote in message ... Phil, Squid-in-Training wrote: The magnesium lowers of my 2003 Manitou Skareb Comp had begun to crack last This is a farily well-known problem with the 2003 reverse arch forks. Supposedly things were fixed for 2004. I have heard of failures of the 2003 forks, but not the 2004. FWIW. Yup... all over MTBR. I'm surprised they didn't recall them all; I'd be scared to know what a heavier rider could do... I'm only 135 lbs. -- Phil, Squid-in-Training |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Ride-A-Lot wrote:
I'm a mechanical engineering student. The post was written more for rec.bike.tech, but I guess I won't lose the group next time with my techno babble. Well, that explains a lot. I think GeeDub is a mech eng, too. But I don't remember him using techno babble. I'd never admit to being an engineer (glorified secretary), especially a mechanical engineer. Lowest form of life next to Mike Vandeman. Like Mike, mechanical engineers think they know all that there is to know until you point out their obvious flaws......which they still insist is correct.....until it breaks like the manitou fork.......and for craps sake, stop trying to re-invent the freeken wheel.....and admit when you're wrong!!!! They don't call it a BS in Engineering for nothing. (;-} Gary (Williams Woodworking, Inc.!) |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"Gwood" wrote in message ... Any recourse via Manitou ? Hoping my old trusty SX-R will give me another couple of years... The SX-R has the normal arch, doesn't it? If so, it's probably fine. I sold the fork with the new lowers for $15 on eBay. I kept the old lowers, which are the ones I broke fully yesterday. -- Phil, Squid-in-Training |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
"GeeDubb" wrote in message ... Ride-A-Lot wrote: I'm a mechanical engineering student. The post was written more for rec.bike.tech, but I guess I won't lose the group next time with my techno babble. Well, that explains a lot. I think GeeDub is a mech eng, too. But I don't remember him using techno babble. I'd never admit to being an engineer (glorified secretary), especially a mechanical engineer. Lowest form of life next to Mike Vandeman. Like Mike, Your ignorance is fantastic. I see you like working with your hands and not your brain. Sounds like you just don't like being wrong. It's hard, but you'll get used to it. cc |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"Ride-A-Lot" wrote in message ... Why is it "lackadaisical"? Because I would rather ride than figuring out what to do with an obviously busted fork? Because if forks of the same model are going to fail I'd like to know about it. I'm grateful Phil took the time to analyze the break. It could have been a defect in the casting just on that one fork and then he could have put everyone at ease. Conversely, now we know what types of forks to avoid. I wouldn't have gone to the trouble so his analysis is a lot better than me posting a picture and saying Manitous suck, which is probably what I would have done and then no one would have learned anything. GT -- "Once you have something that grows faster than education grows, you're always going to get a pop culture" - Alan Kay |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 05:00:19 GMT, Phil, Squid-in-Training =
wrote: The magnesium lowers of my 2003 Manitou Skareb Comp had begun to crack= = last year, about 6 months before I stopped riding it. I've kept it stashed= = away for a while until today, when I was cleaning my room and found the = lowers. I gave the legs a light (maybe 2.5-4lb) squeeze, and they snapped. = Although I didn't mean to snap them, they lent some interesting insight into th= eir failure. Necessary background: Manitou hailed their reverse arch technology in 2003 as being = revolutionary because it allowed lighter forks, stiffer blah blah blah. The Skareb,= = Six, and Axel were the forks I can remember off the top of my head as havin= g identical lowers. These bikes for 2003 were assembled and shipped wit= h = the fork/stem turned backwards, which, traditionally, puts the arch toward= s = the back of the bike. But with the reverse arch, the arch faces forwards,= = and a bike's weight is all put directly on the arch during shipping. This stresses the fork in a manner that it was never meant to be stressed (perpendicular to the axis of the stresses normally encountered on a M= TB fork). As a result, as these bikes were ridden, the lowers began thei= r downward spiral into separation. My experience: From the first day I bought the bike, the front wheel had always rubbe= d = the v-brake pads when turning. I thought this was just because it was a = light bike (23lb Giant XTC2). But as I continued to ride, my expectations = turned to frustration, as the larger tire that I had put on was actually = beginning to rub the arch when braking hard. This wasn't really a problem until= I began riding more aggressively. It was at that point that noticed tha= t = the wheel was beginning to get cocked to the side with the mere applicatio= n = of weight. I knew this was out of the norm and searched for the problem,= = which I found in the form of a crack in the fork leg that contained the coil= spring. New updated lowers with a beefed-up arch/leg join were sent, = = and I installed them without a hitch. After another 2 months of use, I brok= e = the damping assembly inside the fork. Rather than fix it or pay to have i= t fixed (I wasn't working at an LBS at the time) I left it as it was, spring-only. After another 3 months, I acquired my current bike (Gian= t STP2) and a Fox Vanilla. The Skareb with the updated, uncracked, flex= y lowers was put aside. Today: I broke the lowers manually and was surprised to see what had transpir= ed. The crack was much more extensive than I had thought, making an = interesting path parallel to the casting wall. Photos: (I'm a much better photographer than I am a rider) Here it is a year ago when I first identified the crack: http://plaza.ufl.edu/phillee/rbt/p1.jpg http://plaza.ufl.edu/phillee/rbt/p2.jpg Here is the upper half, the arch portion: http://plaza.ufl.edu/phillee/rbt/u1.jpg http://plaza.ufl.edu/phillee/rbt/u2.jpg Here is the lower half, the leg portion: http://plaza.ufl.edu/phillee/rbt/l1.jpg Here are the component parts, for reference: http://plaza.ufl.edu/phillee/rbt/o1.jpg (note: shiny marks on the pointy parts of the cracks are due to my matching-up of the two broken pieces, which, I assume, smoothed over t= he apexes of broken edges.) Analysis: Dark corrosion shows fatigue cracks weaving its way through the magnes= ium (if it really is magnesium) up to a certain point about 2mm away from = the surface. From that point, the cracks then take a 60-degree turn upwar= d towards the arch. This suggests that at least some of the stress experienced by the lowers were shear stresses (45 degrees if fully = shear). The cracks actually occupy a rather large portion of the total cross section. Failure would have been imminent had I continued to ride it.= = The final fracture indicates brittle material, with a smooth sandpaper-lik= e surface. Beach/clamshell marks are not very prominent, but they are = there. Corrosion is also visible at the very inside edge (the portion with th= e smaller radius) of the casting. This is particularly worrisome, as it= appears that the fork had begun to fail not just at the thick portion,= = but at the thin portion too. If this were the case, failure would occur e= ven faster since the forces acting along the thin part of the cross-sectio= n would guarantee high bending moments, and thus high tensile stresses. = If they were acting along the long part of the cross-section, the forces = at = the ends of the cross-section would not be as high. The location of the inside edge corrosion also suggests that the casti= ng = was improperly radiused/chamfered, at least in the original design. These= = sharp corners should be avoided. Final word: I'm lucky these didn't totally fail on me while I was ridi= ng = it. --Phil, Squid-in-Training Excellent work and pix... Thanks. This gives me 2nd thoughts about = defecting from the 'hood. Glad the failure didn't happen while you were riding. -- = Slacker |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
"Phil, Squid-in-Training" wrote in message ... Nah, that stuff is all basic materials science/machine design stuff. I was about to do it for him until I kept reading and saw he did it himself. Yay ME students! Hehe... I was hoping you'd notice. However, I do believe extensive research is needed to determine the contents of that ziploc baggie... LOL... if you really want to know, they're pumpkin seeds. http://plaza.ufl.edu/phillee/rbt/itspumpkinseedsduh.jpg Yeah, they're pumpkin seeds you bunch o' eejits - Phil keeps his weed stash elsewhere so NER! Shaun aRe -- Sometimes, the true and living thought bubbling rapidly up from the depths, surfaces with a severe case of the Benz. -- Life is the dream you wake up to. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Road bike vs. Mountain bike Q-factor | Ron | Techniques | 8 | October 19th 04 08:25 PM |
Still Looking for a bike | [email protected] | UK | 19 | September 5th 04 10:25 AM |
aus.bicycle FAQ (Monthly(ish) Posting) | kingsley | Australia | 3 | February 24th 04 08:44 PM |
How old were you when you got your first really nice bike? | Brink | General | 43 | November 13th 03 10:49 AM |
First road bike: braking? | Alan Hoyle | General | 47 | September 28th 03 11:40 PM |