Mountain Biking FAQ

On Sat, 08 Jul 2006 10:26:52 +0100, "Just zis Guy, you know?"
wrote:

On Sat, 08 Jul 2006 00:09:45 GMT, Mike Vandeman
said in :

Did you say something?
Sure did, but since you are all transmit and no receive you wouldn't
have heard.

That's because I have found that I get no worthwhile (valid)
information from 99% of the people in the newsgroups,

Yes, we are well aware that your test for "valid" and "worthwhile"
information is that it agrees with your bigoted agenda, and therefore
pretty much 100% of all information here and elsewhere is, according
to your "special" criteria, invalid and not worthwhile. Even that
which you consider "valid" and "worthwhile" can turn out on
investigation to recommend the precise opposite of your interpretation
of it. Your mind is either completely closed or so open your brain
fell out years ago.

I just gave my mountain biking paper at the EIGHTH international
scientific conference, where it was assepted as valid. Meanwhile, YOU
are confined to the peanut gallery: alt.mountain-bike. It's obvious
which one of us is more effective.

Guy
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

Mike Vandeman wrote:

I just gave my mountain biking paper at the EIGHTH international
scientific conference

What conference? Where? When? Details, please!

where it was assepted as valid.

Well, you're an ass, so no wonder it was assepted! LOL

"Bill Sornson" wrote in message
...
Mike Vandeman wrote:

I just gave my mountain biking paper at the EIGHTH international
scientific conference

What conference? Where? When? Details, please!

where it was assepted as valid.

Well, you're an ass, so no wonder it was assepted! LOL


Also, how many people were there?

On Sat, 08 Jul 2006 11:30:59 -0700, di wrote:


"Bill Sornson" wrote in message
...
Mike Vandeman wrote:

I just gave my mountain biking paper at the EIGHTH international
scientific conference

What conference? Where? When? Details, please!

where it was assepted as valid.

Well, you're an ass, so no wonder it was assepted! LOL


Also, how many people were there?


Two; Mikey and his mom.
____
Slack

On Sat, 08 Jul 2006 17:10:15 GMT, "Bill Sornson"
wrote:

Mike Vandeman wrote:

I just gave my mountain biking paper at the EIGHTH international
scientific conference

What conference? Where? When? Details, please!

It's on my web site. Learn to read.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

On Sat, 8 Jul 2006 13:30:59 -0500, "di" wrote:


"Bill Sornson" wrote in message
. ..
Mike Vandeman wrote:

I just gave my mountain biking paper at the EIGHTH international
scientific conference

What conference? Where? When? Details, please!

where it was assepted as valid.

Well, you're an ass, so no wonder it was assepted! LOL


Also, how many people were there?

A couple dozen. I didn't count them.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Sat, 8 Jul 2006 13:30:59 -0500, "di" wrote:


"Bill Sornson" wrote in message
...
Mike Vandeman wrote:

I just gave my mountain biking paper at the EIGHTH international
scientific conference

What conference? Where? When? Details, please!

where it was assepted as valid.

Well, you're an ass, so no wonder it was assepted! LOL


Also, how many people were there?

A couple dozen. I didn't count them.

So this "EIGHTH international scientific conference" had around 20 people at
it.

And this "human-free habitat" you dream of creating is all of 10 feet by 10
feet in size. (I remember that post well LOL )

Anyone else notice a /pattern/ here? Mikey talks big, but thinks small.

Sorni

On Sat, 08 Jul 2006 20:48:22 GMT, "Bill Sornson"
wrote:

Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Sat, 8 Jul 2006 13:30:59 -0500, "di" wrote:


"Bill Sornson" wrote in message
...
Mike Vandeman wrote:

I just gave my mountain biking paper at the EIGHTH international
scientific conference

What conference? Where? When? Details, please!

where it was assepted as valid.

Well, you're an ass, so no wonder it was assepted! LOL


Also, how many people were there?

A couple dozen. I didn't count them.

So this "EIGHTH international scientific conference" had around 20 people at
it.

Not the conference, the session. The conference probably had several
hundred people, maybe even a thousand. The biggest one was 1700.

And this "human-free habitat" you dream of creating is all of 10 feet by 10
feet in size. (I remember that post well LOL )

Anyone else notice a /pattern/ here? Mikey talks big, but thinks small.

Sorni


===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 08 Jul 2006 17:10:15 GMT, "Bill Sornson"
wrote:

Mike Vandeman wrote:

I just gave my mountain biking paper at the EIGHTH international
scientific conference

What conference? Where? When? Details, please!

It's on my web site. Learn to read.
He answered a "call for papers" which is open to the general public. He was
not invited as a keynote speaker. He was not listed in the publicity of the
conference beforehand. He was alotted 15-20 minutes with all the other
presenters who answered the "call for papers". He paid to be there. His
audience was likely made up of the other presenters waiting their turn at
the podium. There were other presentations and activities going on elsewhere
as he made his presentation.
There will be no issue of review or comment on his opinions from anyone else
at the conference. He merely pads his resume to make it appear he has
credibility on the subject.
===

On Sat, 08 Jul 2006 16:32:31 GMT, Mike Vandeman
said in :

I just gave my mountain biking paper at the EIGHTH international
scientific conference, where it was assepted as valid. Meanwhile, YOU
are confined to the peanut gallery: alt.mountain-bike. It's obvious
which one of us is more effective.

Yes indeed: you have effectively insured that your bigotry will never
be taken seriously, as evidence the fact that it remains unpublished
in any reputable peer-reviewed journal and you are reduced to hawking
it at conferences in the vain hope that someone there will believe
you. Whereas I have a life, family, friends, and am in the middle of
moving to a bigger house to accommodate our various hobbies. I can
see who is the more effective here for sure. There is no need to take
you seriously, because your chances of success are less than zero -
due in no small part to the fact that, by all the external evidence,
you are incapable of effective interaction with members of the human
race.

Do feel free to come back when your ramblings have been accepted for
publication in a reputable peer-reviewed journal, won't you? We'll
still tell you to **** off, of course.

Guy
--
May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

85% of helmet statistics are made up, 69% of them at CHS, Puget Sound