A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Mountain Biking
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why Usenet is worthless!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 18th 08, 02:27 PM posted to alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent,rec.bicycles.misc,rec.bicycles.tech,rec.bicycles.soc,alt.mountain-bike
humbug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13
Default Why Usenet is worthless!

Melinda Shore wrote:

In article ,
!Jones wrote:
I'm sure there are other changes, but 977 was and still is the
seminal, primary source document.


I've read a couple of your posts and they're largely
horse****. I imagine 977 has some historical interest for
somebody or other but if someone wanted to sit down and code
up a new implementation they certainly would not be starting
with a superceded document.

I always used to post that when I
wanted to make myself a PITA. That usually resulted in my account
being terminated with extreme prejudice;


I doubt that very much.


What the **** this has to do with bicycles I am yet to fathom.......



--

Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why Usenet is worthless! JimmyMac General 4 June 20th 08 04:03 AM
Why Usenet is worthless! JimmyMac Mountain Biking 4 June 20th 08 04:03 AM
Why Usenet is worthless! humbug General 0 June 18th 08 02:27 PM
Just how worthless is ARBR? JimmyMac Recumbent Biking 1 February 24th 08 01:57 AM
Q. How worthless are 29ers and SSs? â–€Slack Mountain Biking 6 October 3rd 07 06:36 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.