|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Stupid MTB vs. Road Bike frame sizing question
Bob wrote:
Stupid question: In general, if you are building an MTB/rough surface bike where you will be sitting in a more upright position but you are sticking with a 700c wheel... does the frame need to get a couple inches smaller ? Am I totally whacked to do this on 700c wheels or am I just into Sheldon territory ? You will need to factor in more standover clearance if you'll be riding it on "rough surfaces", but how much clearance is enough is up to the rider and depends on HOW rough the surface is (a canal path vs. a very technical, rocky descent). The more important measurement is the top tube length - normally the top tubes on a road bike and off-road MTB will be similar for a given rider, assuming "cross-country" style riding (not downhill). When you start with 700c (aka 29 inch) wheels, you're limiting the number of riders who will be able to have appropriate standover clearance, and might be introducing some toe / shoe overlap, depending on the top tube length. Mark Hickey Habanero Cycles http://www.habcycles.com Home of the $795 ti frame |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Stupid MTB vs. Road Bike frame sizing question
"Mark Hickey" wrote: You will need to factor in more standover clearance if you'll be riding it on "rough surfaces", but how much clearance is enough is up to the rider and depends on HOW rough the surface is. (clip) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Besides needing enough standover height, there is a second reason for toptube/crotch clearance. Riding over difficult terrain at low speed, the rider leans the bike while standing on the pedals. If the top tube is too high, the clearance for this type of maneuvering is limited. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Stupid MTB vs. Road Bike frame sizing question
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:10:17 GMT, Bob wrote:
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 06:37:00 -0700, Mark Hickey wrote: You will need to factor in more standover clearance if you'll be riding it on "rough surfaces", but how much clearance is enough is up to the rider and depends on HOW rough the surface is (a canal path vs. a very technical, rocky descent). The more important measurement is the top tube length - normally the top tubes on a road bike and off-road MTB will be similar for a given rider, assuming "cross-country" style riding (not downhill). When you start with 700c (aka 29 inch) wheels, you're limiting the number of riders who will be able to have appropriate standover clearance, and might be introducing some toe / shoe overlap, depending on the top tube length. Thanks, boys. I'll go for it. I just need a "rough surface" bike with MTB type bars for some trail/dirt road riding where the road bike just won't do. And, I have a 70's road bike frame that is a little small for me that is _really_ looking for a project, so this looks like it! Sounds fun. Enjoy. If you want to really go nuts you can have studs for cantilever brakes brazed on. Ron |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Stupid MTB vs. Road Bike frame sizing question
Leo Lichtman wrote:
Besides needing enough standover height, there is a second reason for toptube/crotch clearance. Riding over difficult terrain at low speed, the rider leans the bike while standing on the pedals. If the top tube is too high, the clearance for this type of maneuvering is limited. And you get a nasty bruise on the inside of your leg where the top tube hits it. :-) Duke |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mountain bike wheels + Road frame? | Jim Rogers | Techniques | 8 | February 26th 05 02:40 AM |
Rec.Bicycles Frequently Asked Questions Posting Part 1/5 | Mike Iglesias | General | 4 | October 29th 04 07:11 AM |
Sunday Times: Death row: Britain's most dangerous road | Sufaud | UK | 45 | September 28th 04 09:06 PM |
Is it better to upgrade the components on my 10 yr old frame, orbuy a new bike? | Paul | Mountain Biking | 9 | May 30th 04 11:50 PM |