|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Safety in numbers?
Clive George wrote:
From another list: The thing which improves cyclist safety the most is increasing numbers - and that means encouraging everyday use of bikes, not just saving them and dressing up for special occasions. Jacobsen's "safety in numbers" article (the root of that meme) is bad science. Good rebuttals are pending publication. The first paragraph is mine - anybody know anything about what's hinted in the latter? I'd like to test the hypothesis or perhaps reword it. Perhaps: "The more motor vehicle drivers are also regular cyclists, the lower the crash rate for cyclists" see also: http://www.camcycle.org.uk/newsletters/53/article5.html (from April 2004) The year after I wrote that I spent 10 days cycling in Denmark. I realised how considerate Danish drivers were to cyclists. I then discovered that some 60% (?) of Danish drivers are also regular cyclists. Or is it the 'liabilty' rules that make Danish drivers more considerate? Jim |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Safety in numbers?
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 02:38:46 -0700 (PDT), spindrift
wrote: On Mar 30, 10:57*am, (Roger Merriman) wrote: Clive George wrote: From another list: The thing which improves cyclist safety the most is increasing numbers - and that means encouraging everyday use of bikes, not just saving them and dressing up for special occasions. Jacobsen's "safety in numbers" article (the root of that meme) is bad science. Good rebuttals are pending publication. The first paragraph is mine - anybody know anything about what's hinted in the latter? no idea. but my own experiance leads me to be a least a bit cincal about it, living here, sw london ish area bikes are common as is traffic squeezing past, back nr my folks place around the beacons and into the "valleys" bikes are not common, and traffic does tend to overtake, as is over the white line. thats not to say that "safety in numbers" as a idea has no mert but much like "speed kills" it does depend on the where/when and other qualifcations. roger --www.rogermerriman.com Capital to Coastwww.justgiving.com/rogermerriman Safety in numbers: more walkers and bicyclists, safer walking and bicycling P L Jacobsen Conclusion: A motorist is less likely to collide with a person walking and bicycling if more people walk or bicycle. Policies that increase the numbers of people walking and bicycling appear to be an effective route to improving the safety of people walking and bicycling. http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/.../short/9/3/205 More cycling is making UK roads safer Oct 20th CTC has welcomed news that an increase in cycling has made it safer to cycle on UK roads. Basing its figures on Department for Transport statistics, CTC estimates that cycle use in the UK has increased by 10 per cent since 1993, and that the rate of reported pedal casualties has decreased by more than 34 per cent over the same period. Sorry old bean is out of date - I think you will find there is more up to date information (from the DfT) The average number of trips by bicycle fell by just over a fifth (22%) between 1995/97 and 2005, from 18 to 14 trips per person per year. Over the same period, the average distance traveled by bicycle fell by 16%, from 43 to 36 miles per person per year. -- British Medical Association (BMA) View on helmets: Several studies provided solid scientific evidence that bicycle helmets protect against head, brain, severe brain and facial injuries, as well as death, as a result of cycling accidents |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Safety in numbers?
On Mar 30, 10:57*am, (Roger Merriman) wrote:
like "speed kills" it does depend on the where/when and other qualifcations. Sacrilege! You KNOW by now that that assertion is on the Banned List: no matter how true it is, you're not allowed to say it, as it disadvantages the anti-motorist effort by effectively arguing against one of its main planks (the abuse of speed enforcement in order to bully motorists off the roads). The Group Owner, Chapman, will be along shortly once His Highness has decided what the consequences of your transgression will be. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Safety in numbers?
Yawn. Spindrift starts off with an anti-motorist position and tries
to make the figures fit through patchwork copying and pasting, again. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Some data on Safety In Numbers. | spindrift | UK | 22 | November 10th 08 03:48 PM |
Safety in Numbers | Roos Eisma | UK | 249 | September 17th 08 09:20 AM |
Numbers to think about | CowPunk | Racing | 107 | August 2nd 06 10:48 AM |
Safety in Numbers. | Simon Mason | UK | 11 | April 23rd 05 09:34 PM |
bicycling - safety in numbers | Paul R | Social Issues | 7 | April 20th 05 03:51 PM |