|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
At last - road deaths to be taken seriously.
It's been a long time coming but at last road deaths will get the same
level of investigation as flooding, air crashes and train accidents. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8048971.stm -- Simon Mason |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
At last - road deaths to be taken seriously.
In message
, " writes It's been a long time coming but at last road deaths will get the same level of investigation as flooding, air crashes and train accidents. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8048971.stm Whilst that would be welcome, that isn't what the article says. The RAC foundation are saying that they would like to see such investigation into the causes of crashes. The article finishes saying the government doesn't support such an idea -- Chris French |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
At last - road deaths to be taken seriously.
On 14 May, 08:12, " wrote:
It's been a long time coming but at last road deaths will get the same level of investigation as flooding, air crashes and train accidents. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8048971.stm -- *Simon Mason Of course I should have said it's just a proposal at present. -- Simon Mason |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
At last - road deaths to be taken seriously.
"Brimstone" wrote in message ... wrote: On 14 May, 08:12, " wrote: It's been a long time coming but at last road deaths will get the same level of investigation as flooding, air crashes and train accidents. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8048971.stm -- Simon Mason Of course I should have said it's just a proposal at present. Your clarification will save an awful lot of posts. I think the proposal is an excellent one, but sadly unlikely to get any further. If put into practice it will unturn a lot of stones. And with each and every stone unturned, there will be a conclusion as to how the accident could have been prevented. And with each conclusion as to how the accident could have been prevented there will be new rules and safety measures put into place to prevent it happening again. And when those rules are broken, poor Mr Toad will be fined or go to prison. If motorists think they have it bad now with speed cameras, just wait a few years. Licences will be hard to get and easily taken away. People will not be able to rely on their cars. Isn't that what the guvvermunt want? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
At last - road deaths to be taken seriously.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
At last - road deaths to be taken seriously.
Brimstone wrote:
wrote: On 14 May, 08:12, " wrote: It's been a long time coming but at last road deaths will get the same level of investigation as flooding, air crashes and train accidents. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8048971.stm -- Simon Mason Of course I should have said it's just a proposal at present. Your clarification will save an awful lot of posts. I think the proposal is an excellent one, but sadly unlikely to get any further. From the BBC's site "Police found the cause to be a lapse of concentration by the truck driver who was charged with causing death by careless driving and sentenced to three years in prison. Grayrigg rail crash An 18-month inquiry followed the 2007 Grayrigg rail crash in Cumbria Dr Elliot has questioned whether his lapse was the root cause of the accident. "Motorways are very safe when traffic is flowing smoothly," he said. But when the traffic flow is disrupted, a single lapse could lead to tragedy, he added. "It is arguable that the root cause of the accident was an earlier accident on the same section of motorway that caused the traffic jam in which the car was stopped," he said. "It is not clear whether this could have been cleared more quickly if, for example, there had been no pressure to investigate possible criminal offences." So, this has bugger all to do with safety but more to do with keeping traffic flowing? The truck driver might have missed them if he could have kept driving? ******** -- it was slow traffic and people were not paying attention. This appears to be nothing more than 'hurry up and clear our roads, the faster we go the safer it is'. meh -- Come to Dave & Boris - your cycle security experts. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
At last - road deaths to be taken seriously.
Keith T wrote:
Brimstone wrote: wrote: On 14 May, 08:12, " wrote: It's been a long time coming but at last road deaths will get the same level of investigation as flooding, air crashes and train accidents. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8048971.stm -- Simon Mason Of course I should have said it's just a proposal at present. Your clarification will save an awful lot of posts. I think the proposal is an excellent one, but sadly unlikely to get any further. From the BBC's site "Police found the cause to be a lapse of concentration by the truck driver who was charged with causing death by careless driving and sentenced to three years in prison. Grayrigg rail crash An 18-month inquiry followed the 2007 Grayrigg rail crash in Cumbria Dr Elliot has questioned whether his lapse was the root cause of the accident. "Motorways are very safe when traffic is flowing smoothly," he said. But when the traffic flow is disrupted, a single lapse could lead to tragedy, he added. "It is arguable that the root cause of the accident was an earlier accident on the same section of motorway that caused the traffic jam in which the car was stopped," he said. "It is not clear whether this could have been cleared more quickly if, for example, there had been no pressure to investigate possible criminal offences." So, this has bugger all to do with safety but more to do with keeping traffic flowing? The truck driver might have missed them if he could have kept driving? ******** -- it was slow traffic and people were not paying attention. This appears to be nothing more than 'hurry up and clear our roads, the faster we go the safer it is'. meh But as the article suggests, if the traffic hadn't been brought toa stop on a road designeed for fast moving traffic the collision couldn't have happened. You don't understand root cause analysis do you? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
At last - road deaths to be taken seriously.
Brimstone wrote:
Keith T wrote: Brimstone wrote: wrote: On 14 May, 08:12, " wrote: It's been a long time coming but at last road deaths will get the same level of investigation as flooding, air crashes and train accidents. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8048971.stm -- Simon Mason Of course I should have said it's just a proposal at present. Your clarification will save an awful lot of posts. I think the proposal is an excellent one, but sadly unlikely to get any further. From the BBC's site "Police found the cause to be a lapse of concentration by the truck driver who was charged with causing death by careless driving and sentenced to three years in prison. Grayrigg rail crash An 18-month inquiry followed the 2007 Grayrigg rail crash in Cumbria Dr Elliot has questioned whether his lapse was the root cause of the accident. "Motorways are very safe when traffic is flowing smoothly," he said. But when the traffic flow is disrupted, a single lapse could lead to tragedy, he added. "It is arguable that the root cause of the accident was an earlier accident on the same section of motorway that caused the traffic jam in which the car was stopped," he said. "It is not clear whether this could have been cleared more quickly if, for example, there had been no pressure to investigate possible criminal offences." So, this has bugger all to do with safety but more to do with keeping traffic flowing? The truck driver might have missed them if he could have kept driving? ******** -- it was slow traffic and people were not paying attention. This appears to be nothing more than 'hurry up and clear our roads, the faster we go the safer it is'. meh But as the article suggests, if the traffic hadn't been brought toa stop on a road designeed for fast moving traffic the collision couldn't have happened. You don't understand root cause analysis do you? And why had the traffic flow been reduced? Root cause has not been established - other than birth of drivers and manufacture of vehicles. I'm well aware of analysis but it depends where you start or what you want the outcome to be. -- Come to Dave & Boris - your cycle security experts. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
At last - road deaths to be taken seriously.
On Thu, 14 May 2009 00:12:39 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote: It's been a long time coming but at last road deaths will get the same level of investigation as flooding, air crashes and train accidents. http:// It's been a long time coming - and it will continue to be a long time coming - don't hold your breath. -- "Primary position" the middle of a traffic lane. To take the "primary position" : to ride a bike in the middle of the lane in order to obstruct other road vehicles from overtaking. A term invented by and used by psycholists and not recognised in the Highway Code. Highway Code Rule 168 : "Never obstruct drivers who wish to pass." |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"Action urged to stop road deaths" | Doug[_3_] | UK | 1 | May 5th 09 06:38 PM |
Report: Deaths of cyclists due to road crashes ATSB Jul'06 | Donga | Australia | 96 | August 29th 06 01:47 PM |
Cycle road deaths article on ITV news shortly | [email protected] | UK | 1 | June 30th 06 07:01 PM |
Deaths since 7 July | [email protected] | UK | 19 | October 9th 05 12:32 PM |
J.S. Dean. Murder most foul: a study of the road deaths problem. | Howard | UK | 5 | April 10th 04 09:23 PM |