Armstrong Cancels Sao Paulo Trip

On 12/10/2011 15:46, Brad Anders wrote:
On Oct 12, 7:28 am, wrote:
On 10/12/2011 10:24 AM, BL wrote: Personal reasons. Target letter?

http://midiasport.com.br/noticiasDetalhes.php?cd=5601

Possibly served with a Grand Jury Subpoena.

He was here in Phoenix last weekend, doing a local tri. According to
my friends who raced with him, he was not in handcuffs.

http://triathlon.competitor.com/2011...riathlon_41728
--

On Oct 13, 8:39*am, BL wrote:
On 10/12/2011 9:48 PM, Scott wrote: On Oct 12, 8:24 am, *wrote:
Personal reasons. *Target letter?

http://midiasport.com.br/noticiasDetalhes.php?cd=5601

So?

Stay tuned over the coming 5 days. *Elite cyclists are evidently buzzing
that the perp walks are imminent. Time will tell. LOL!!!!

When you LOL, is it an evil laugh, or just sort of a girlie giggle?

On Oct 12, 1:17 pm, Fredmaster of Brainerd wrote:

No. Sheesh. He read this article yesterday (LANCE reads
the NY Times every day):

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/16/mo...n-in-martha-ma...
and realized he had some unfinished business in the States.

She was being interviewed on the tube yesterday and she's a-smoking!
I'd trade both twins for her. She's way finer. She looks more like
Scarlett Johansson's sister than an Olsen.

R

"BL" wrote in message
...
Personal reasons. Target letter?

http://midiasport.com.br/noticiasDetalhes.php?cd=5601

I doubt there are many here who would find it surprising that he'd get
one. But it's kinda gone on a whole lot longer than anybody thought it
would. Or should I be including you as a subset of anybody? I mean
seriously, you've been posting about this eventuality for a very, very
long time, yet instead of ever suggesting that it's been frustrating
because it's been dragging out for so long, your posts continue to imply
"new & exciting!"

I think it's reasonable to assume that, here on RBR, people generally
believe that you thought a "target letter" would have come some time
ago. Interested in having a sincere dialog about that? Personally, not
that that matters, I would rather here your thoughts now, rather than
after the fact. Whatever the fact may end up being.

Thanks-

--Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
www.ChainReactionBicycles.com

Fredmaster of Brainerd wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/16/mo...n-in-martha-ma...
and realized he had some unfinished business in the States.

RicodJour wrote:
She was being interviewed on the tube yesterday and she's a-smoking!
I'd trade both twins for her. She's way finer. She looks more like
Scarlett Johansson's sister than an Olsen.

The overriding criteria though is does she look like LANCE's mom ?

Scott wrote:
When you LOL, is it an evil laugh, or just sort of a girlie giggle?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqs-LXdgt1o

On 10/14/2011 2:19 AM, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote:
wrote in message
...
Personal reasons. Target letter?

http://midiasport.com.br/noticiasDetalhes.php?cd=5601

I doubt there are many here who would find it surprising that he'd get
one. But it's kinda gone on a whole lot longer than anybody thought it
would. Or should I be including you as a subset of anybody? I mean
seriously, you've been posting about this eventuality for a very, very
long time, yet instead of ever suggesting that it's been frustrating
because it's been dragging out for so long, your posts continue to imply
"new& exciting!"

It is really not surprising that the investigation has taken this long.
It's a complex money and other evidence trail to follow.

I think it's reasonable to assume that, here on RBR, people generally
believe that you thought a "target letter" would have come some time
ago. Interested in having a sincere dialog about that? Personally, not
that that matters, I would rather here your thoughts now, rather than
after the fact. Whatever the fact may end up being.

My impression from his attorney's actions is that Armstrong received a
target letter a while back. He may have been subpoenaed of late, but
the more I consider it, the wholesale cancellation of his Brazil trip
would not be caused by a subpoena that could be rescheduled. While my
criminal attorney friends think it un-likely that the US Attorney would
let him avoid the perp walk by giving him advance notice of an
indictment and arrest so he could quietly turn himself in, I think that
may be what has happened. Time will tell. :-)

Thanks-

--Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
www.ChainReactionBicycles.com

My impression from his attorney's actions is that Armstrong received a
target letter a while back. He may have been subpoenaed of late, but
the more I consider it, the wholesale cancellation of his Brazil trip
would not be caused by a subpoena that could be rescheduled. While my
criminal attorney friends think it un-likely that the US Attorney
would let him avoid the perp walk by giving him advance notice of an
indictment and arrest so he could quietly turn himself in, I think
that may be what has happened. Time will tell. :-)

Is an arrest a requirement of being indicted? I'm sure that sounds like
a dumb question, but I never really thought about the idea before that
anyone who goes to trial was, by defintion, previously arrested for
something, that you couldn't be "charged" without having been
"arrested."

--Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
www.ChainReactionBicycles.com


"BL" wrote in message
...
On 10/14/2011 2:19 AM, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote:
wrote in message
...
Personal reasons. Target letter?

http://midiasport.com.br/noticiasDetalhes.php?cd=5601

I doubt there are many here who would find it surprising that he'd
get
one. But it's kinda gone on a whole lot longer than anybody thought
it
would. Or should I be including you as a subset of anybody? I mean
seriously, you've been posting about this eventuality for a very,
very
long time, yet instead of ever suggesting that it's been frustrating
because it's been dragging out for so long, your posts continue to
imply
"new& exciting!"

It is really not surprising that the investigation has taken this
long. It's a complex money and other evidence trail to follow.

I think it's reasonable to assume that, here on RBR, people generally
believe that you thought a "target letter" would have come some time
ago. Interested in having a sincere dialog about that? Personally,
not
that that matters, I would rather here your thoughts now, rather than
after the fact. Whatever the fact may end up being.

My impression from his attorney's actions is that Armstrong received a
target letter a while back. He may have been subpoenaed of late, but
the more I consider it, the wholesale cancellation of his Brazil trip
would not be caused by a subpoena that could be rescheduled. While my
criminal attorney friends think it un-likely that the US Attorney
would let him avoid the perp walk by giving him advance notice of an
indictment and arrest so he could quietly turn himself in, I think
that may be what has happened. Time will tell. :-)

Thanks-

--Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
www.ChainReactionBicycles.com

On 10/14/2011 1:42 PM, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote:
My impression from his attorney's actions is that Armstrong received a
target letter a while back. He may have been subpoenaed of late, but
the more I consider it, the wholesale cancellation of his Brazil trip
would not be caused by a subpoena that could be rescheduled. While my
criminal attorney friends think it un-likely that the US Attorney
would let him avoid the perp walk by giving him advance notice of an
indictment and arrest so he could quietly turn himself in, I think
that may be what has happened. Time will tell. :-)

Is an arrest a requirement of being indicted? I'm sure that sounds like
a dumb question, but I never really thought about the idea before that
anyone who goes to trial was, by defintion, previously arrested for
something, that you couldn't be "charged" without having been
"arrested."

--Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
www.ChainReactionBicycles.com


wrote in message
...
On 10/14/2011 2:19 AM, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote:
wrote in message
...
Personal reasons. Target letter?

http://midiasport.com.br/noticiasDetalhes.php?cd=5601

I doubt there are many here who would find it surprising that he'd
get
one. But it's kinda gone on a whole lot longer than anybody thought
it
would. Or should I be including you as a subset of anybody? I mean
seriously, you've been posting about this eventuality for a very,
very
long time, yet instead of ever suggesting that it's been frustrating
because it's been dragging out for so long, your posts continue to
imply
"new& exciting!"

It is really not surprising that the investigation has taken this
long. It's a complex money and other evidence trail to follow.

I think it's reasonable to assume that, here on RBR, people generally
believe that you thought a "target letter" would have come some time
ago. Interested in having a sincere dialog about that? Personally,
not
that that matters, I would rather here your thoughts now, rather than
after the fact. Whatever the fact may end up being.

My impression from his attorney's actions is that Armstrong received a
target letter a while back. He may have been subpoenaed of late, but
the more I consider it, the wholesale cancellation of his Brazil trip
would not be caused by a subpoena that could be rescheduled. While my
criminal attorney friends think it un-likely that the US Attorney
would let him avoid the perp walk by giving him advance notice of an
indictment and arrest so he could quietly turn himself in, I think
that may be what has happened. Time will tell. :-)

Thanks-

--Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
www.ChainReactionBicycles.com
Indictment or
Information-------Arrest----------Arraignment-------Bail
Hearing--------Discovery and motion practice----Plea or
Trial------Verdict-----If guilty, pre-sentencing period and
reports----Sentencing

On 14/10/2011 23:45, BL wrote:

BL Dream------LA Arrest----------Arraignment-------Bail
Hearing--------Discovery and motion practice----Plea or
Trial------Verdict-----If guilty, pre-sentencing period and
reports----Sentencing-------wakes up disappointed.


--