|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
gds wrote:
The article you quote talks about percentages of total burned attributed to fat. But one still needs to calcualte the absolute amount. So, hypothetically you can burn a smaller percentage from fat but still burn more fat if your total energy consumptuion is higher by enough. I don't have the data at my hands but the algebra certainly works over a large range of values. I've seen the same sort of figures, somewhere, I can't remember where. The thing that sticks out in my mind goes something like: at 65% vo2max, you're burning a higher percentage of fat, but at 75% vo2max, you're burning a lower percentage but a higher total amount of fat and a lot more energy. And IIRC, your energy consumption isn't a linear progression as your percentage of vo2max goes up. Anecdotally folks who ride a lot at the cardio level seem to be leaner than folks who train mostly at the fat burning level. A riders tend to be leaner than B who are leaner than C riders etc. So those who are working harder seem to also be able to burn fat pretty well.(Of course total training plays a role here as well as intensity) Funny how that works, ain't it? *grin* -km -- Only cowards fight kids -- unidentified Moscow protester http://community.webshots.com/user/blackrosequilts proud to be owned by a yorkie |
Ads |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Gels vs Gatorade | Ken | Techniques | 145 | August 3rd 04 06:56 PM |
First road bike: braking? | Alan Hoyle | General | 47 | September 28th 03 11:40 PM |
FAQ | Just zis Guy, you know? | UK | 27 | September 5th 03 10:58 PM |
Riding to get fit and lose weight: any advice? | Doesnotcompute | UK | 20 | July 25th 03 10:28 AM |