The Shed Thread

Mon, 21 May 2012 08:32:00 uk.rec.cycling
Peter Keller

On Sun, 20 May 2012 11:54:58 +0100, Wm... wrote:

Sun, 20 May 2012 08:42:17 uk.rec.cycling
Peter Keller

On Sat, 19 May 2012 17:25:56 +0100, Judith wrote:

"****" is more succinct.

And sensuous.

I think you are pushing the boundaries of decency, Peter.

To the best of my knowledge no-one has ever said they find Judith
attractive.

I don't recall having ever said that. I may have expressed a hope at
some stage.

I think it is compulsory to ask for a picture about now.

--
Wm...
Reply-To: address valid for at least 7 days

Mon, 21 May 2012 10:37:02
uk.rec.cycling Judith

On Sun, 20 May 2012 18:47:45 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR
wrote:

snip


It seems to me you are Front Mech/BikeyBloke/Justin ****wit.

Judith?


Afraid not - both complete ****wits - but not the same person.

I'm not any of them.

Unlike Judith I am honest and say who I am.

Wm (aka Maggot) has been here for some time. He really is barking.

Arf

He frequents some of the other newsgroups which I do - and the general
consensus is that he is a real fruit cake.

Only one, I think.

Another who is not to be trusted - he has challenged me over a number of things
- he has then reneged on them after I have fulfilled my side of the bargain.

That is a lie.

Nasty piece of work - and barking to boot.

Judith is the one that backed off.


--
Wm...
Reply-To: address valid for at least 7 days

On Sun, 20 May 2012 23:42:24 +0100, Judith
wrote:

On Sun, 20 May 2012 20:03:23 +0100, Bertie Wooster
wrote:

snip


Judith, Mr Benn and Bodgejob met up at the BP AGM to hand a letter to
a senior manager complaining about Simon Mason stalking *them*!



Oh no. It was not just a letter - it was a face to face discussion.

It was most rewarding as well, I might add.

(Did you notice the tremendous coincidence that numb-nuts stopped posting from
the BP IT system in the week following the AGM ?)

No coincidence - I met Simon and we discussed how the trolls became
the Three Billy Goats.

PS If you need to discuss anything regarding the management of BP Chemicals, I
have the direct line of two senior people.

Just ask :-)

On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:42:00 +0100, "Wm..."
wrote:

Sun, 20 May 2012 23:42:24
uk.rec.cycling Judith

On Sun, 20 May 2012 20:03:23 +0100, Bertie Wooster
wrote:

snip


Judith, Mr Benn and Bodgejob met up at the BP AGM to hand a letter to
a senior manager complaining about Simon Mason stalking *them*!

So they say.

So they *did*. I met with Simon on the day of the Big Ride.

Oh no. It was not just a letter - it was a face to face discussion.

It was most rewarding as well, I might add.

(Did you notice the tremendous coincidence that numb-nuts stopped posting from
the BP IT system in the week following the AGM ?)

PS If you need to discuss anything regarding the management of BP Chemicals, I
have the direct line of two senior people.

Just ask :-)

I'm asking.

On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:49:30 +0100, "Wm..."
wrote:

Sun, 20 May 2012 20:03:23
uk.rec.cycling Bertie Wooster


Judith, Mr Benn and Bodgejob met up at the BP AGM to hand a letter to
a senior manager complaining about Simon Mason stalking *them*!

Is there any evidence that actually happened?

Yes.

It seems to me you are a braggart and bully.

He's not a bully

OK, maybe we have a difference of words.

Perhaps - but as far as I am concerned bullies don't consistently make
fools of themselves. (But perhaps he is bullying himself!)

On Mon, 21 May 2012 11:42:54 +0100, "Wm..."
wrote:

snip



Another who is not to be trusted - he has challenged me over a number of things
- he has then reneged on them after I have fulfilled my side of the bargain.

That is a lie.

Nasty piece of work - and barking to boot.

Judith is the one that backed off.


Oh dear - poor old Maggot - it is there for all to see.



================================================== =========
You claimed that Chapman told you he was going to have a joke at my expense
and post as Lou Knee, before he was rumbled.

You were lying.

I bet you that this was not the case - you agreed to the bet.

You then failed to honour the agreement after you had used the words "I agree"
(or similar)

================================================== ============


That was in fact the second time that you had reneged on an agreement with me.

Previously you said that you would take a certain action if I emailed you with
some information.

I did so.



================================================== =============


You are a despicable liar who is not to be trusted.

If you disagree - just provide your proof that *you* are correct.

You can do that I assume?

On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:46:26 +0100, "Wm..."
wrote:

Sun, 20 May 2012 18:47:45
uk.rec.cycling Dave - Cyclists VOR

It seems to me you are Front Mech/BikeyBloke/Justin ****wit.

Judith?

I am definitely not any of the above.



They are all liars - so I can see why Dave jumped to the conclusion which he
did.

On 21/05/2012 10:44, Wm... wrote:
Mon, 21 May 2012 08:02:17 uk.rec.cycling
JNugent


You said: "You don't seem to have any courage in your beliefs whatever they
may be", and I explained that for most of my personal data (and that
includes many of my beliefs), I am not interested in public discussion.

If you are not interested in public discussion isn't a news group an odd
place to say things that, by definition, other people will read and respond to?

I *am* interested in public discussion.

I am *not* interested in public discussion of my personal circumstances, and
I don't expect that many others would feel very different about that, though
as we know, there are always exceptions.

On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:57:59 +0100, Wm... wrote:

Mon, 21 May 2012 08:30:38 uk.rec.cycling
Peter Keller


Read what I said, to the best of my knowledge no-one has ever said
they find you attractive.

To be found unattractive by Judith is, I think, a compliment.

It is.
A really great compliment by someone who seems somehow to be greatly
attracted to you.

I think it must be the seafood thing.

Have we done ===
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whale_louse ===
yet?

No not yet. I think it is most appropriate.
Thanks for the reference.



--
Life is a venereal disease with 100% mortality.

On Mon, 21 May 2012 11:04:15 +0100, Wm... wrote:

Mon, 21 May 2012 08:32:55 uk.rec.cycling
Peter Keller


You mean the very short minidress with the split way up the side?

That is mutton dressed as lamb, rather than a hot pot.

Yorks or Lancs, you decide.

How about Cumbria?



--
Life is a venereal disease with 100% mortality.