|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
VERY FAR OFF
|
Ads |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
A Hard Lesson(s) Learned
"Bill Sornson" wrote:
Moron comment of the month. A) She wasn't covert under the relevant law (obviously, or someone would be in jail for it); and B) it was RICHARD ARMITEGE who leaked her name to Bob Novak. Since Armitege was a Clinton holdover, he wasn't even /threatened/ with indictment, much less charged with anything. John Forrest Tomlinson wrote: "Since"? You think Patrick Fitzgerald or the current US Justice Department wouldn't go after Dick Armitage because he had served in the Clinton White House? Put down your crack pipe, turn off the Rush Limbaugh and try to think clearly for once. Fitzgerald knew it was Armitage before he indicted Libby. -- Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org Open every day since 1 April, 1971 |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
A Hard Lesson(s) Learned
A Muzi wrote:
"Bill Sornson" wrote: (Hey, whaddya know! Flogittodeathlinson STILL removes context from stuff! LOL ) Moron comment of the month. A) She wasn't covert under the relevant law (obviously, or someone would be in jail for it); and B) it was RICHARD ARMITEGE who leaked her name to Bob Novak. Since Armitege was a Clinton holdover, he wasn't even /threatened/ with indictment, much less charged with anything. John Forrest Tomlinson wrote: "Since"? You think Patrick Fitzgerald or the current US Justice Department wouldn't go after Dick Armitage because he had served in the Clinton White House? Put down your crack pipe, turn off the Rush Limbaugh and try to think clearly for once. Fitzgerald knew it was Armitage before he indicted Libby. Fitzgerald knew it was Armitege AND that there was no underlying crime (just ask Victoria Tensung -- sp? -- who wrote the frigging law) within a few days of opening the investigation. Yet he let it go on for /over a year/ -- dragging in people repeatedly, hoping that someone -- /anyone/ -- would slip up -- while speculation and "hopeful" reporting ran rampant in the media and lives and careers were ruined. All for one reason: political power. As for the "current US Justice Department", it doesn't investigate leaks (at least ones /harmful/ to the US or the Administration); and it lets people like Sandy Berglar and William Jefferson (Democrat, Louisiana) go free. (You know, people who REALLY DID commit crimes.) It's astounding, really. BS (not) |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
A Hard Lesson(s) Learned
On Fri, 25 May 2007 22:34:22 -0500, A Muzi
wrote: "Bill Sornson" wrote: Moron comment of the month. A) She wasn't covert under the relevant law (obviously, or someone would be in jail for it); and B) it was RICHARD ARMITEGE who leaked her name to Bob Novak. Since Armitege was a Clinton holdover, he wasn't even /threatened/ with indictment, much less charged with anything. John Forrest Tomlinson wrote: "Since"? You think Patrick Fitzgerald or the current US Justice Department wouldn't go after Dick Armitage because he had served in the Clinton White House? Put down your crack pipe, turn off the Rush Limbaugh and try to think clearly for once. Fitzgerald knew it was Armitage before he indicted Libby. I'm arguing about the "since" part -- Fitzgerald did not indict Armitage because he thought he coudl not convict, not because Fitzgerald gives Clinton appointees a pass. -- JT **************************** Remove "remove" to reply Visit http://www.jt10000.com **************************** |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
A Hard Lesson(s) Learned
On Fri, 25 May 2007 21:10:21 -0700, "Bill Sornson"
wrote: Fitzgerald knew it was Armitege AND that there was no underlying crime (just ask Victoria Tensung -- sp? -- who wrote the frigging law) within a few days of opening the investigation. Yet he let it go on for /over a year/ -- dragging in people repeatedly, hoping that someone -- /anyone/ -- would slip up -- while speculation and "hopeful" reporting ran rampant in the media and lives and careers were ruined. All for one reason: political power. As for the "current US Justice Department", it doesn't investigate leaks (at least ones /harmful/ to the US or the Administration); and it lets people like Sandy Berglar and William Jefferson (Democrat, Louisiana) go free. Your theory that Fitzgerald is some sort of Democtratic partisan makes no sense. He was appointed by a Republican and ran his investigation, including the part focussing on Libby, while Republicans controlled congresss. Are you playing the "persecuted Reblicans" card again, even when it is the the Republicans controlling the portion of goverment doing it? Is the big bad liberal media so powerful that it forces everyone to be anti-neocon, and the threat of Democrats someday coming to power so strong that every thing that hurts a Bush crony is inherently partisan? Was good working for the Liberal cabal when he called Kennyboy Lay home while letter liberals stil live????? On Victoria Toesning, she is simply wrong - other senior government officials involved in the creating and enforcing the law, as well as senior officials at the CIA have said so. She is a major partisan, while there are people of several political persuasions (including nonpartisan) opposed to her interpretation of the law. (You know, people who REALLY DID commit crimes.) Scooter Libby lied to Federal officials. That is a crime. -- JT **************************** Remove "remove" to reply Visit http://www.jt10000.com **************************** |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
A Hard Lesson(s) Learned
On Fri, 25 May 2007 21:10:21 -0700, "Bill Sornson"
wrote: there was no underlying crime (just ask Victoria Tensung -- sp? -- who wrote the frigging law) within a few days of opening the investigation. Here you go dumbass, about Valerie Plame's cover status http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18924679/ -- JT **************************** Remove "remove" to reply Visit http://www.jt10000.com **************************** |
#107
|
|||
|
|||
A Hard Lesson(s) Learned
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lesson 1 | MagillaGorilla | Racing | 5 | January 1st 07 01:06 AM |
Windtrainer 101 - Lesson 1 | DaveB | Australia | 8 | February 27th 06 02:33 AM |
A lesson or two | wafflycat | UK | 8 | July 26th 05 01:25 AM |
I guess Pereiro learned his lesson | Gary | Racing | 10 | July 20th 05 08:16 AM |
I learned a valuable lesson... | joona | Unicycling | 5 | November 21st 03 09:47 PM |