|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Commentary: Cleared or not, Landis is a loser
"Donald Munro" wrote in message . com... Caroline wrote: LOL! You're cute. No, I'm a mean bitch who rides a broom and chases down Cat 5s for drafting on road ref vehicles! '-( Hopefully its a carbon fibre broom. Pinarello Magnesium Witches Swoosh Premier! How else can I make the sparks fly? I've been thinking... Some of you may have the idea that I am against the amnesty for riders. That's not the case at all. I'm all for that. Caroline |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Commentary: Cleared or not, Landis is a loser
"Donald Munro" wrote in message . com... wrote: that babe in the woods act is bull****. this is aldag's quote : "About four of us sat on the curb during one of the Grand Tours," began Aldag, referring to his 1994 season. "We had been totally dropped and couldn't keep up. What could we do? I started thinking about doping and asked around." So what if Aldag et al had decided not to do what everyone else was doing ? They'd have lost their contracts at the end of the season and would have been replaced by neo-pros or amateurs who were taking. It may seem easy for you to condemn from your ivory tower, but it was their careers not just a fatty master saturday criterium. Wow! There's a whole flock just flew over your head and you didn't see one of them! THAT is my point! And WHO puts the pressure on the athletes to dope? Why don't all of these "agencies" go after the ones who are PROMOTING the damned doping? Give amnesty to the riders and announce that any UCI team caught doping will have all management/support/training personnel banned for ten years or more... I suspect that would clean things up in a hearbeat! Some of you guys are too busy thinking up excuses for the trees to see the forest. Caroline |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Commentary: Cleared or not, Landis is a loser
Dans le message de news:GXG5i.2310$3B1.1238@trnddc08,
Caroline a réfléchi, et puis a déclaré : "Donald Munro" wrote in message . com... wrote: that babe in the woods act is bull****. this is aldag's quote : "About four of us sat on the curb during one of the Grand Tours," began Aldag, referring to his 1994 season. "We had been totally dropped and couldn't keep up. What could we do? I started thinking about doping and asked around." So what if Aldag et al had decided not to do what everyone else was doing ? They'd have lost their contracts at the end of the season and would have been replaced by neo-pros or amateurs who were taking. It may seem easy for you to condemn from your ivory tower, but it was their careers not just a fatty master saturday criterium. Wow! There's a whole flock just flew over your head and you didn't see one of them! THAT is my point! And WHO puts the pressure on the athletes to dope? Why don't all of these "agencies" go after the ones who are PROMOTING the damned doping? Give amnesty to the riders and announce that any UCI team caught doping will have all management/support/training personnel banned for ten years or more... I suspect that would clean things up in a hearbeat! Some of you guys are too busy thinking up excuses for the trees to see the forest. Caroline Your forest is really a speck. Last year, according to (my memory and) the anti-doping prosecutor in Italy, 600 million euros of fake prescription drugs were sold, for purposes such as cycling doping. So, get the pharma companies, the distributors, drug stores (yes, the licensed ones), your neighbor (who could be a dirty drug dealer), etc. Your nice and moral words don't make a dent in the influential side of the puzzle. And I still don't get why you think there is any need for banishment. What's the logic? If you are in the US, you probably don't know about the labor issues of preventing a person from earning within his profession. It takes a lot to expel them, especially at the stock exchanges, even when they are contemporaneously in prison. And you don't address the potentially beneficial effects of many of the drugs, nor the insane basis on which some are allowed, some are prohibited, and others fall in our out depending on the year and federation. Coffee anyone? -- Sandy -- Il n'est aucune sorte de sensation qui soit plus vive que celle de la douleur ; ses impressions sont sûres, elles ne trompent point comme celles du plaisir. - de Sade. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Commentary: Cleared or not, Landis is a loser
On May 25, 3:55 pm, "Sandy" wrote:
Coffee anyone? Depends. Is it "bugno style" ? |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Commentary: Cleared or not, Landis is a loser
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Commentary: Cleared or not, Landis is a loser
On Fri, 25 May 2007 19:39:18 GMT, "Caroline"
wrote: THAT is my point! And WHO puts the pressure on the athletes to dope? Why don't all of these "agencies" go after the ones who are PROMOTING the damned doping? Give amnesty to the riders and announce that any UCI team caught doping will have all management/support/training personnel banned for ten years or more... I suspect that would clean things up in a hearbeat! You seem to believe that these are all UCI related organizations. WADA does not really care about cleaning up cycling as an organization and they aren't tasked with that. They are a third party that primarily has the ability (as it impacts cycling) to every once in a while grab a body and toss it into the combine (Kansas style, not UCI). So when you remove WADA, who do you have left to make the rules? Oh, pretty much those guys you want to clean up. Probably the best that outside forces can do is put on enough pressure to once again split pro from amateur, such as it is (IMO a good thing). There IS no inside pressure, beond the well documented self-interests of promoters, teams and sponsors. Curtis L. Russell Odenton, MD (USA) Just someone on two wheels... |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Commentary: Cleared or not, Landis is a loser
On Fri, 25 May 2007 21:55:37 +0200, "Sandy" wrote:
Coffee anyone? No, thanks. I have a cup. Stop picking on us coffee drinkers. We're just doing what we have to do to get through the day. We're innocent victims, practically virgins. Curtis L. Russell Odenton, MD (USA) Just someone on two wheels... |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Commentary: Cleared or not, Landis is a loser
In article AqF5i.15$WZ6.5@trnddc03,
"Caroline" wrote: "Sandy" wrote in message ... Dans le message de news:nYA5i.8476$TU1.2500@trnddc07, Caroline a réfléchi, et puis a déclaré : wrote in message oups.com... On May 25, 5:34 am, "Caroline" wrote: I hate what the directeurs sportif and trainers have done to cycling with their doping. I have known cyclists who were doped without their knowing it because the team honchos came to them with "vitamins" they needed. All of the cycling governing agencies are going after the wrong people when they go after the athletes. dumbass, that babe in the woods act is bull****. this is aldag's quote : "About four of us sat on the curb during one of the Grand Tours," began Aldag, referring to his 1994 season. "We had been totally dropped and couldn't keep up. What could we do? I started thinking about doping and asked around." So he was too damned stupid to think, "Man, something's gotta be wrong with my training program..." The bottom line here, in my opinion, is that doping could NOT get to where it is today through athletes alone. Now, are there lazy people who want to win the Tour without working? You betcha! And there always will be. But I don't know of any doping shops where you have to show your UCI or USCF or whatever federation license in order to buy their goods. And I do know cyclists who were pushed into it by their team's trainers and coaches. Once a trainer or a coach is proven to have promoted or assisted or facilitated doping, that person should be banned from the sport for life. Caroline Are you occasionally beset by a forgiveness and remediation mode, or is this you more or less always ? LOL! You're cute. No, I'm a mean bitch who rides a broom and chases down Cat 5s for drafting on road ref vehicles! '-( Seriously, I love the sport. I'll be having nine or ten guys spend the weekend here for the criterium races in the DFW area this weekend. So SOMETIMES I'm one of the good guys.... But!!! Name ONE team director, administrator, trainer, physician, whatever, who has had sanctions placed against him or who has been banned from the sport. Guys today who think about doping and wonder if it can improve their performance are extremely late comers to the game! Which is WHY they know about it. For the years that doping -- drugs, blood boosting, whatever -- has been around, it's always the athletes who are punished. With very few exceptions, there aren't a whole lot of riders who know how to get into this stuff without help. At the elite levels, Cat 1s through Pro ranks, my observation is that they get the stuff through team connecctions. So how come the axe always falls on the athlete's neck? It is my observation that you guys at the elite level are treated like a commodity. If "they" can enhance your performance with doping and you get caught, YOU get punished, but there are a lot more new riders coming up through the ranks. I don't think that's the way things should be done. That's all. Feel free to disagree. Thanks, but I agree. Now how to prove it? -- Michael Press |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Commentary: Cleared or not, Landis is a loser
In article ,
Dan Gregory wrote: Caroline wrote: Name ONE team director, administrator, trainer, physician, whatever, who has had sanctions placed against him or who has been banned from the sport. Manolo Saez Don't forget Bruno Roussel and Willy Voet from Festina. -- tanx, Howard Never take a tenant with a monkey. remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok? |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Commentary: Cleared or not, Landis is a loser
On May 25, 12:55 pm, "Sandy" wrote:
Your forest is really a speck. Last year, according to (my memory and) the anti-doping prosecutor in Italy, 600 million euros of fake prescription drugs were sold, for purposes such as cycling doping. So, get the pharma companies, the distributors, drug stores (yes, the licensed ones), your neighbor (who could be a dirty drug dealer), etc. Holy crap. 600 million euros of _fake_ drugs? How many of real drugs? At that rate, cracking down on doping could ruin the economy! WADA and the narco police must be stopped! Well, okay, the GDP of Italy is about a trillion euros, so fake drugs are only 1/1600 of the _total_ economy, but it still seems high. I hope at least some of those are being sold to gym rats, bodybuilders, and footy players, because if they're all going to guys doping for granfondos, we are truly into excessive Masters Fatties spending territory. Another way of looking at it is that Fuentes faxed Haven and Tyler an invoice for about $54,000. The 600 million figure suggests about 10,000 Tylers (10,000 people spending as much as Tyler, that is. To Tyler's credit, if Fuentes was on the up-and-up, Tyler was getting the real deal, not 600 million Euros of fake stuff.) That's rather a lot larger than the Euro peleton. I'll guess it's still larger than the number of granfondo riders that are on a serious program. Ben Follow the money. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
question; if landis is cleared | [email protected] | Racing | 45 | October 21st 06 08:16 AM |
Sad Commentary | B. Lafferty | Racing | 13 | August 5th 06 02:38 AM |
commentary follie | flyingdutch | Australia | 12 | July 20th 05 05:08 AM |
Odd commentary by McEwen? | Jet | Racing | 3 | July 7th 05 08:47 PM |
commentary about "The Race" | [email protected] | Racing | 0 | July 5th 05 06:31 PM |