Who wins on commute - runner or cyclist?

It's a close thing.

http://road.cc/content/news/168941-v...g-journey-work

It's a close thing.

http://road.cc/content/news/168941-v...g-journey-work

Single speed might destroy the knees even faster than jogging.

The real advantage of running here is not having to lock up the bike.


Bret Cahill

On Thursday, 15 October 2015 17:45:47 UTC+1, Bret Cahill wrote:
It's a close thing.

http://road.cc/content/news/168941-v...g-journey-work

Single speed might destroy the knees even faster than jogging.

The real advantage of running here is not having to lock up the bike.

And not having to stop at red lights.

On 15/10/2015 17:50, Alycidon wrote:
On Thursday, 15 October 2015 17:45:47 UTC+1, Bret Cahill wrote:
It's a close thing.

http://road.cc/content/news/168941-v...g-journey-work

Single speed might destroy the knees even faster than jogging.

The real advantage of running here is not having to lock up the bike.

And not having to stop at red lights.



Cyclists don't do that anyway.

On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 19:50:44 +0100, David Lang wrote:

On 15/10/2015 17:50, Alycidon wrote:
On Thursday, 15 October 2015 17:45:47 UTC+1, Bret Cahill wrote:
It's a close thing.

http://road.cc/content/news/168941-v...commuter-race-
twist-londoner-times-his-running-vs-cycling-journey-work

Single speed might destroy the knees even faster than jogging.

The real advantage of running here is not having to lock up the bike.

And not having to stop at red lights.



Cyclists don't do that anyway.

So true ...

On 16/10/2015 09:48, Peter Keller wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 19:50:44 +0100, David Lang wrote:

On 15/10/2015 17:50, Alycidon wrote:
On Thursday, 15 October 2015 17:45:47 UTC+1, Bret Cahill wrote:
It's a close thing.

http://road.cc/content/news/168941-v...commuter-race-
twist-londoner-times-his-running-vs-cycling-journey-work

Single speed might destroy the knees even faster than jogging.

The real advantage of running here is not having to lock up the bike.

And not having to stop at red lights.



Cyclists don't do that anyway.

So true ...

I do, except the odd pedestrian crossing when there's no one else
crossing or likely to cross.

On Friday, October 16, 2015 at 1:53:29 AM UTC-7, Bod wrote:
On 16/10/2015 09:48, Peter Keller wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 19:50:44 +0100, David Lang wrote:

On 15/10/2015 17:50, Alycidon wrote:
On Thursday, 15 October 2015 17:45:47 UTC+1, Bret Cahill wrote:
It's a close thing.

http://road.cc/content/news/168941-v...commuter-race-
twist-londoner-times-his-running-vs-cycling-journey-work

Single speed might destroy the knees even faster than jogging.

The real advantage of running here is not having to lock up the bike.

And not having to stop at red lights.



Cyclists don't do that anyway.

So true ...

I do, except the odd pedestrian crossing when there's no one else
crossing or likely to cross.

This is all hypothetical but supposing you are out in the middle of the desert. No motorists are out on the road.

Not only will no one care if you run a stop light or stop sign, no one will even notice.


Bret Cahill

On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 09:53:29 +0100, Bod wrote:

On 16/10/2015 09:48, Peter Keller wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 19:50:44 +0100, David Lang wrote:

On 15/10/2015 17:50, Alycidon wrote:
On Thursday, 15 October 2015 17:45:47 UTC+1, Bret Cahill wrote:
It's a close thing.

http://road.cc/content/news/168941-v...commuter-race-
twist-londoner-times-his-running-vs-cycling-journey-work

Single speed might destroy the knees even faster than jogging.

The real advantage of running here is not having to lock up the
bike.

And not having to stop at red lights.



Cyclists don't do that anyway.

So true ...

I do, except the odd pedestrian crossing when there's no one else
crossing or likely to cross.

I always stop at red lights.
It gives me a chance to safely ogle that delicious miniskirted girl
walking on the pavement.