A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » General
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 28th 06, 11:02 PM posted to alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent,rec.bicycles.soc,rec.bicycles.misc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups


"S Curtiss" wrote in message
news[email protected]

"Edward Dolan" wrote in message
...

"S Curtiss" wrote in message
news:[email protected]

"Edward Dolan" wrote in message
news:[email protected] com...

[...]
ALL newsgroups without any exceptions whatsoever are by and for
idiots. Therefore, it does not matter what gets posted on any of them
since only idiots like Curtiss are present. If you want intelligence,
then go to a moderated forum where an editor will get rid of the
idiots and their idiotic messages.
Hello Dolan, the great idiot

Thus proving my point!
To who...?

I repeat, there is no one on these newsgroups (unmoderated) except
assholes and jerks! What else do you need to know?
Hello Dolan, the great asshole and jerk.

Thus proving my point!
You didn't have to work so hard to prove you are an idiot, asshole and
jerk. We've known that for quite some time.


The only thing worse than being an idiot, an asshole and a jerk is being
Curtiss. He is nothing but a pathetic stalker of Vandeman. Worse yet, he
does nothing but regurgitate boilerplate nonsense about how mountain
biking does not impact hikers. He does both of these things because he
is evil through and through. He would like to be a Great Saint like Saint
Edward the Great, but that option is forever foreclosed to him because he
is a man of the groin preoccupied with ****, **** and sex and not a man
of the holy spirit like Saint Edward the Great.


"ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am
"regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL
Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact"
hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction.
Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is
not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is
comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill effects
are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all comments to
Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could have on
progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently, you can not
grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were you...? In charge
of the picture books?


Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is
nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already said a
thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond to his
posts.

You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide which
side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to dinner and
would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be a stalker is
the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at Jim McNamara for
instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a stalker too.

The Great Ed Dolan does not ever stalk anyone. I have my own agenda and
cannot even imagine anyone else in the universe to be even remotely as
interesting as myself.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota


Ads
  #2  
Old June 29th 06, 01:03 AM posted to alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent,rec.bicycles.soc,rec.bicycles.misc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups


"Edward Dolan" wrote in message
news[email protected] com...


"ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am
"regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL
Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact"
hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction.
Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is
not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is
comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill effects
are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all comments to
Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could have on
progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently, you can not
grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were you...? In
charge of the picture books?


Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is
nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already said
a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond to his
posts.

Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person from
reading or responding to any other post.
Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst.

You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide which
side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to dinner
and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be a
stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at Jim
McNamara for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a stalker
too.


Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think I am
Greater than I really am.


The Great Ed Dolan does not ever stalk anyone. I have my own agenda and
cannot even imagine anyone else in the universe to be even remotely as
interesting as myself.

pathetic


  #3  
Old June 29th 06, 02:02 AM posted to alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent,rec.bicycles.soc,rec.bicycles.misc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups


"S Curtiss" wrote in message
news[email protected]

"Edward Dolan" wrote in message
news[email protected] com...


"ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am
"regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL
Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact"
hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction.
Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is
not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is
comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill
effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all
comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could
have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently,
you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were
you...? In charge of the picture books?


Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is
nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already
said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond
to his posts.

Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person from
reading or responding to any other post.
Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst.


Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my
posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it is
all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way. Something is
dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or two persons. You
desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note
Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny.

You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide
which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to
dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be
a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at
Jim McNamara for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a
stalker too.


Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think I
am Greater than I really am.


I am the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are - a stalker and a
leech! No one else has the intelligence to do this. I should really be
charging you something for my services.
[...]

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota



  #4  
Old June 29th 06, 05:48 AM posted to alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent,rec.bicycles.soc,rec.bicycles.misc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups


Edward Dolan wrote:
"S Curtiss" wrote in message
news[email protected]

"Edward Dolan" wrote in message
news[email protected] com...


"ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am
"regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL
Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact"
hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction.
Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is
not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is
comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill
effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all
comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could
have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently,
you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were
you...? In charge of the picture books?

Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is
nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already
said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond
to his posts.

Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person from
reading or responding to any other post.
Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst.


Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my
posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it is
all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way. Something is
dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or two persons. You
desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note
Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny.


Right ... You are cacophony of bu**** all up an down the scale.

You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide
which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to
dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be
a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at
Jim McNamara for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a
stalker too.


Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think I
am Greater than I really am.


I am the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are - a stalker and a
leech! No one else has the intelligence to do this. I should really be
charging you something for my services.


Say Steve ... from one stalkeg to another ;^) ... Despit what DOlan
claims, this doens't take any degree of intelligcnce and Ed isn't the
only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are. You are an Ed Dolan
adversary and an Ed Dolan irritant and you are doing a great job. Keep
up the good work. By the way, there is no charge for my surfaces.
I'll undercut Dolan's price any day. - Jim McNamara


[...]

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota


  #5  
Old June 29th 06, 05:48 AM posted to alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent,rec.bicycles.soc,rec.bicycles.misc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups


Edward Dolan wrote:
"S Curtiss" wrote in message
news[email protected]

"Edward Dolan" wrote in message
news[email protected] com...


"ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am
"regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL
Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact"
hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction.
Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is
not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is
comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill
effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all
comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could
have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently,
you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were
you...? In charge of the picture books?

Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is
nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already
said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond
to his posts.

Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person from
reading or responding to any other post.
Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst.


Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my
posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it is
all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way. Something is
dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or two persons. You
desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note
Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny.


Right ... You are cacophony of bu**** all up an down the scale.

You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide
which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to
dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be
a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at
Jim McNamara for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a
stalker too.


Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think I
am Greater than I really am.


I am the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are - a stalker and a
leech! No one else has the intelligence to do this. I should really be
charging you something for my services.


Say Steve ... from one stalkeg to another ;^) ... Despit what DOlan
claims, this doens't take any degree of intelligcnce and Ed isn't the
only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are. You are an Ed Dolan
adversary and an Ed Dolan irritant and you are doing a great job. Keep
up the good work. By the way, there is no charge for my surfaces.
I'll undercut Dolan's price any day. - Jim McNamara


[...]

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota


  #6  
Old June 29th 06, 06:01 AM posted to alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent,rec.bicycles.soc,rec.bicycles.misc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups


"JimmyMac" wrote in message
ups.com...

Edward Dolan wrote:
"S Curtiss" wrote in message
news[email protected]

"Edward Dolan" wrote in message
news[email protected] com...


"ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am
"regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL
Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not
"impact"
hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some
reaction.
Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it
is
not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails
is
comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill
effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all
comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments
could
have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently,
you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were
you...? In charge of the picture books?

Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There
is
nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already
said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to
respond
to his posts.

Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person
from
reading or responding to any other post.
Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst.


Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my
posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it
is
all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way. Something
is
dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or two persons.
You
desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note
Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny.


Right ... You are cacophony of bu**** all up an down the scale.

You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide
which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to
dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To
be
a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look
at
Jim McNamara for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a
stalker too.

Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think
I
am Greater than I really am.


I am the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are - a stalker
and a
leech! No one else has the intelligence to do this. I should really be
charging you something for my services.


Say Steve ... from one stalkeg to another ;^) ... Despit what DOlan
claims, this doens't take any degree of intelligcnce and Ed isn't the
only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are. You are an Ed Dolan
adversary and an Ed Dolan irritant and you are doing a great job. Keep
up the good work. By the way, there is no charge for my surfaces.
I'll undercut Dolan's price any day. - Jim McNamara


Actually I require some intellectuality and that is the one thing that is
sorely lacking from all my current adversaries. I really miss Tom Sherman.
He at least tried to display some intellect from time to time. Poor Jimbo
thinks verbiage is a substitute for thought. And so it goes - no one worthy
of me. It is apparently my destiny to go through life surrounded by idiots,
jerks and assholes.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota


  #7  
Old June 29th 06, 06:15 AM posted to alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent,rec.bicycles.soc,rec.bicycles.misc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups


"JimmyMac" wrote in message
oups.com...

Edward Dolan wrote:
"S Curtiss" wrote in message
news[email protected]

"Edward Dolan" wrote in message
...

"S Curtiss" wrote in message
news:[email protected]

"Edward Dolan" wrote in message
news:[email protected] com...
[...]
ALL newsgroups without any exceptions whatsoever are by and for
idiots. Therefore, it does not matter what gets posted on any of
them
since only idiots like Curtiss are present. If you want
intelligence,
then go to a moderated forum where an editor will get rid of the
idiots and their idiotic messages.
Hello Dolan, the great idiot

Thus proving my point!
To who...?

I repeat, there is no one on these newsgroups (unmoderated) except
assholes and jerks! What else do you need to know?
Hello Dolan, the great asshole and jerk.

Thus proving my point!
You didn't have to work so hard to prove you are an idiot, asshole
and
jerk. We've known that for quite some time.

The only thing worse than being an idiot, an asshole and a jerk is
being
Curtiss. He is nothing but a pathetic stalker of Vandeman. Worse yet,
he
does nothing but regurgitate boilerplate nonsense about how mountain
biking does not impact hikers. He does both of these things because
he
is evil through and through. He would like to be a Great Saint like
Saint
Edward the Great, but that option is forever foreclosed to him because
he
is a man of the groin preoccupied with ****, **** and sex and not a
man
of the holy spirit like Saint Edward the Great.

"ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am
"regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL
Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not
"impact"
hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some
reaction.
Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is
not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is
comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill
effects
are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all comments to
Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could have on
progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently, you can
not
grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were you...? In
charge
of the picture books?


Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is
nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already
said a
thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond to his
posts.

You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide
which
side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to dinner
and
would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be a stalker
is
the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at Jim McNamara
for
instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a stalker too.

The Great Ed Dolan does not ever stalk anyone. I have my own agenda and
cannot even imagine anyone else in the universe to be even remotely as
interesting as myself.


Not even Sherman or Vandeman???


Jim, unlike you, I do not confuse cyperspace with real life. Sherman and
Vandeman are only what I read on my computer screen. Unless and until I meet
them in person, that is all they can ever be.The same goes for you too of
course.

I will admit I think I was stalking Tom Sherman at one time briefly, but I
grew disgusted with myself for doing that and I decided I would only take
him on when he got outrageously stupid. I always left him alone when he was
posting on topic and I would only take him on when he got political. The
last year or so Tom and I did not have much to say to one another because he
steered away from political topics almost entirely. He knew far more about
recumbents than I did and I respected him for that.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota


  #8  
Old June 29th 06, 06:34 AM posted to rec.bicycles.misc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups

On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 00:15:14 -0500, "Edward Dolan"
wrote:

snip


Jim, unlike you, I do not confuse cyperspace with real life. Sherman and
Vandeman are only what I read on my computer screen. Unless and until I meet
them in person, that is all they can ever be.


Tommy Keats are you reading this?


snip
  #9  
Old June 29th 06, 07:03 AM posted to rec.bicycles.misc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups

In article ,
R Brickston [email protected] writes:

Tommy Keats are you reading this?


1) please do not refer to me with the diminuative: "Tommy".
That's reserved for people I particularly like, Bobby.
And even then, not that often.

2) No. I'm making better use of my time by listening to
rock tunes from the early-mid '70s, plus some 50's rockabilly,
plus some late '70s-early-'80s New Wave.

Da Da Da.

I'm a honky-tonk man, and I can't seem to stop.
I love to give the girls a whirl to the music of
an old juke box.

Motha****a shoulda stayed his ass home.

Go to sleep bitch, close your eyes.

When I was young, I had a crash,
the old man's car took quite a bash ...

Girl, this punishment is rough,
don't you think I've paid enough.

Something tells me my lucky number's
going to be changing soon ...

If you see my milk cow, please drive her home.

You can't always get what you want.


cheers, & **** the hell off grin,
Tom

--
-- Nothing is safe from me.
Above address is just a spam midden.
I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups Edward Dolan Social Issues 75 July 8th 06 04:24 AM
How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups Edward Dolan Recumbent Biking 78 July 8th 06 04:24 AM
How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups Edward Dolan General 0 June 28th 06 07:26 AM
Hey Dolan I hope Vandeman doesn't stop suddenly Edward Dolan Social Issues 0 June 10th 06 07:57 AM
An experiment to prove the helmet law proponants RIGHT (or wrong) David Recumbent Biking 65 December 21st 04 07:42 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2022 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.