|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
How the Typical Environmentalist Treats Horses Damaging Trails
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:50:06 -0800 (PST), Kayak44
wrote: On Feb 5, 9:00*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:19:32 -0800 (PST), Kayak44 wrote: On Feb 5, 11:12*am, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 03:26:44 -0800 (PST), Kayak44 wrote: On Feb 4, 11:54*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:18:31 -0800 (PST), Kayak44 wrote: On Feb 3, 9:01*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 05:50:45 -0800 (PST), Siskuwihane wrote: On Jan 31, 11:09*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: \"I have lived in Marin since the 50s and have been riding horses here since 1962. *I would like to share two of my experiences of why I believe that horses and bicycles on single track trails are oil and water. *snip BSTwo horses weighting 1000 lbs. with riders perched on top, making them about 7 ft. tall and she couldn't see us. *I rest my case." 2000 lbs of horses on a trail, imagine the damage cause by those animals and yet Michael J. Vandeman is defending them instead of trying to get them banned. Horses are native to North America and have a right to go wherever they like. Bikes have no rights whatsoever. DUH! But you claimed the native horses were wiped out by early humans, these are not native horses, thus they do not belong. We need to restore the horse to North America, just as we need to restore the grizzly to California, because we wiped out both of them. Maybe we should also restore polio while we're at it. Yes, of course. But humans are too selfish to do so. Humans belong here a heck of a lot less than horses. If you really believed that, you would have removed yourself from this planet a long time ago. You're still around because you are selfish. Leave it to a selfish mountain biker to miss the point. If you actually believed what you just said, you would have committed suicide long ago. You should re-check the groups you are cross posting to before you call me a mountain biker, otherwise you are nothing more than a liar. I never called you a mountain biker. That would be pretty low, wouldn't it? Not any lower than lying. You were corresponding with me when you wrote: "Leave it to a selfish mountain biker to miss the point". Are you now insinuating that the remark wasn't directed towards me? Was someone else involved in that exchange of communication whose information is hidden? No, your remark was clearly intended for me. You are starting to come off as a manipulative person. Where do you see me calling you a mountain biker? You are fantasizing. -- I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of! http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande |
Ads |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
How the Typical Environmentalist Treats Horses Damaging Trails
On Feb 6, 9:30*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:50:06 -0800 (PST), Kayak44 wrote: On Feb 5, 9:00*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:19:32 -0800 (PST), Kayak44 wrote: On Feb 5, 11:12*am, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 03:26:44 -0800 (PST), Kayak44 wrote: On Feb 4, 11:54*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:18:31 -0800 (PST), Kayak44 wrote: On Feb 3, 9:01*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 05:50:45 -0800 (PST), Siskuwihane wrote: On Jan 31, 11:09*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: \"I have lived in Marin since the 50s and have been riding horses here since 1962. *I would like to share two of my experiences of why I believe that horses and bicycles on single track trails are oil and water. *snip BSTwo horses weighting 1000 lbs. with riders perched on top, making them about 7 ft. tall and she couldn't see us. *I rest my case." 2000 lbs of horses on a trail, imagine the damage cause by those animals and yet Michael J. Vandeman is defending them instead of trying to get them banned. Horses are native to North America and have a right to go wherever they like. Bikes have no rights whatsoever. DUH! But you claimed the native horses were wiped out by early humans, these are not native horses, thus they do not belong. We need to restore the horse to North America, just as we need to restore the grizzly to California, because we wiped out both of them. Maybe we should also restore polio while we're at it. Yes, of course. But humans are too selfish to do so. Humans belong here a heck of a lot less than horses. If you really believed that, you would have removed yourself from this planet a long time ago. You're still around because you are selfish. Leave it to a selfish mountain biker to miss the point. If you actually believed what you just said, you would have committed suicide long ago. You should re-check the groups you are cross posting to before you call me a mountain biker, otherwise you are nothing more than a liar. I never called you a mountain biker. That would be pretty low, wouldn't it? Not any lower than lying. You were corresponding with me when you wrote: "Leave it to a selfish mountain biker to miss the point". Are you now insinuating that the remark wasn't directed towards me? Was someone else involved in that exchange of communication whose information is hidden? No, your remark was clearly intended for me. You are starting to come off as a manipulative person. Where do you see me calling you a mountain biker? You are fantasizing. Judging by that picture of you in the devil thong chasing a cyclist, it's obvious the only person fantasizing is you. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
How the Typical Environmentalist Treats Horses Damaging Trails
On Feb 5, 5:26*am, Kayak44 wrote:
OnFeb4, 11:54*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Wed, 4Feb200916:18:31 -0800 (PST), Kayak44 wrote: OnFeb3, 9:01*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Tue, 3Feb200905:50:45 -0800 (PST), Siskuwihane wrote: On Jan 31, 11:09*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: \"I have lived in Marin since the 50s and have been riding horses here since 1962. *I would like to share two of my experiences of why I believe that horses and bicycles on single track trails are oil and water. *snip BSTwo horses weighting 1000 lbs. with riders perched on top, making them about 7 ft. tall and she couldn't see us. *I rest my case." 2000 lbs of horses on a trail, imagine the damage cause by those animals and yet Michael J. Vandeman is defending them instead of trying to get them banned. Horses are native to North America and have a right to go wherever they like. Bikes have no rights whatsoever. DUH! But you claimed the native horses were wiped out by early humans, these are not native horses, thus they do not belong. We need to restore the horse to North America, just as we need to restore the grizzly to California, because we wiped out both of them. Maybe we should also restore polio while we're at it. Humans belong here a heck of a lot less than horses. If you really believed that, you would have removed yourself from this planet a long time ago. You're still around because you are selfish. Selfish people like mountain bikers can't understand doing anything to benefit some one else, or wildlife. See above.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Not funny. Polio still exist. Many that contracted it are now experiencing a secondary reoccurance of it. Also, NO vaccine is 100% effective. This has happened to some of my patients. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
How the Typical Environmentalist Treats Horses Damaging Trails
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 19:14:43 -0800 (PST), Kayak44
wrote: On Feb 6, 9:30*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:50:06 -0800 (PST), Kayak44 wrote: On Feb 5, 9:00*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:19:32 -0800 (PST), Kayak44 wrote: On Feb 5, 11:12*am, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 03:26:44 -0800 (PST), Kayak44 wrote: On Feb 4, 11:54*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:18:31 -0800 (PST), Kayak44 wrote: On Feb 3, 9:01*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 05:50:45 -0800 (PST), Siskuwihane wrote: On Jan 31, 11:09*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: \"I have lived in Marin since the 50s and have been riding horses here since 1962. *I would like to share two of my experiences of why I believe that horses and bicycles on single track trails are oil and water. *snip BSTwo horses weighting 1000 lbs. with riders perched on top, making them about 7 ft. tall and she couldn't see us. *I rest my case." 2000 lbs of horses on a trail, imagine the damage cause by those animals and yet Michael J. Vandeman is defending them instead of trying to get them banned. Horses are native to North America and have a right to go wherever they like. Bikes have no rights whatsoever. DUH! But you claimed the native horses were wiped out by early humans, these are not native horses, thus they do not belong. We need to restore the horse to North America, just as we need to restore the grizzly to California, because we wiped out both of them. Maybe we should also restore polio while we're at it. Yes, of course. But humans are too selfish to do so. Humans belong here a heck of a lot less than horses. If you really believed that, you would have removed yourself from this planet a long time ago. You're still around because you are selfish. Leave it to a selfish mountain biker to miss the point. If you actually believed what you just said, you would have committed suicide long ago. You should re-check the groups you are cross posting to before you call me a mountain biker, otherwise you are nothing more than a liar. I never called you a mountain biker. That would be pretty low, wouldn't it? Not any lower than lying. You were corresponding with me when you wrote: "Leave it to a selfish mountain biker to miss the point". Are you now insinuating that the remark wasn't directed towards me? Was someone else involved in that exchange of communication whose information is hidden? No, your remark was clearly intended for me. You are starting to come off as a manipulative person. Where do you see me calling you a mountain biker? You are fantasizing. Judging by that picture of you in the devil thong chasing a cyclist, it's obvious the only person fantasizing is you. Of course that's not me, LIAR (if you aren't a mountain biker, why do you need to lie???). You have no idea who it is. -- I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of! http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
How the Typical Environmentalist Treats Horses Damaging Trails
On Feb 6, 11:52*pm, wrote:
On Feb 5, 5:26*am, Kayak44 wrote: OnFeb4, 11:54*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Wed, 4Feb200916:18:31 -0800 (PST), Kayak44 wrote: OnFeb3, 9:01*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Tue, 3Feb200905:50:45 -0800 (PST), Siskuwihane wrote: On Jan 31, 11:09*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: \"I have lived in Marin since the 50s and have been riding horses here since 1962. *I would like to share two of my experiences of why I believe that horses and bicycles on single track trails are oil and water. *snip BSTwo horses weighting 1000 lbs. with riders perched on top, making them about 7 ft. tall and she couldn't see us. *I rest my case." 2000 lbs of horses on a trail, imagine the damage cause by those animals and yet Michael J. Vandeman is defending them instead of trying to get them banned. Horses are native to North America and have a right to go wherever they like. Bikes have no rights whatsoever. DUH! But you claimed the native horses were wiped out by early humans, these are not native horses, thus they do not belong. We need to restore the horse to North America, just as we need to restore the grizzly to California, because we wiped out both of them. Maybe we should also restore polio while we're at it. Humans belong here a heck of a lot less than horses. If you really believed that, you would have removed yourself from this planet a long time ago. You're still around because you are selfish. Selfish people like mountain bikers can't understand doing anything to benefit some one else, or wildlife. See above.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Not funny. Polio still exist. Many that contracted it are now experiencing a secondary reoccurance of it. Also, NO vaccine is 100% effective. This has happened to some of my patients.- Hide quoted text - Try and get the true point here before making assumptions that it was an attempt at humor. Of course it's not funny, it's absurd, but even more absurd is Michael J. Vandemans response to the suggestion, he said "Yes, of course. But humans are too selfish to do so." Someone makes a totally absurd suggestion ( to make a point) and another actually agrees with it, that's where you should be focusing at this point, "PhD believes we should restore polio". |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
How the Typical Environmentalist Treats Horses Damaging Trails
On Sat, 7 Feb 2009 07:18:42 -0800 (PST), Kayak44
wrote: On Feb 6, 11:52*pm, wrote: On Feb 5, 5:26*am, Kayak44 wrote: OnFeb4, 11:54*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Wed, 4Feb200916:18:31 -0800 (PST), Kayak44 wrote: OnFeb3, 9:01*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Tue, 3Feb200905:50:45 -0800 (PST), Siskuwihane wrote: On Jan 31, 11:09*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: \"I have lived in Marin since the 50s and have been riding horses here since 1962. *I would like to share two of my experiences of why I believe that horses and bicycles on single track trails are oil and water. *snip BSTwo horses weighting 1000 lbs. with riders perched on top, making them about 7 ft. tall and she couldn't see us. *I rest my case." 2000 lbs of horses on a trail, imagine the damage cause by those animals and yet Michael J. Vandeman is defending them instead of trying to get them banned. Horses are native to North America and have a right to go wherever they like. Bikes have no rights whatsoever. DUH! But you claimed the native horses were wiped out by early humans, these are not native horses, thus they do not belong. We need to restore the horse to North America, just as we need to restore the grizzly to California, because we wiped out both of them. Maybe we should also restore polio while we're at it. Humans belong here a heck of a lot less than horses. If you really believed that, you would have removed yourself from this planet a long time ago. You're still around because you are selfish. Selfish people like mountain bikers can't understand doing anything to benefit some one else, or wildlife. See above.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Not funny. Polio still exist. Many that contracted it are now experiencing a secondary reoccurance of it. Also, NO vaccine is 100% effective. This has happened to some of my patients.- Hide quoted text - Try and get the true point here before making assumptions that it was an attempt at humor. Of course it's not funny, it's absurd, but even more absurd is Michael J. Vandemans response to the suggestion, he said "Yes, of course. But humans are too selfish to do so." Someone makes a totally absurd suggestion ( to make a point) and another actually agrees with it, that's where you should be focusing at this point, "PhD believes we should restore polio". You make no sense whatsoever. Try writing in English. -- I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of! http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
How the Typical Environmentalist Treats Horses Damaging Trails
Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 03:26:44 -0800 (PST), Kayak44 wrote: Maybe we should also restore polio while we're at it. Yes, of course. But humans are too selfish to do so. And should we re-release smallpox? -Beej |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
How the Typical Environmentalist Treats Horses Damaging Trails
On Feb 7, 1:21*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
You make no sense whatsoever. Try writing in English. Mike, you cannot successfully debate the merits of own points, flawed as they are, let alone refute the merits of someone else's points. You should avoid ad hominem arguments, although it would also silence you if you did. Chris |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
How the Typical Mountain Biker Treats Horses and Other TrailUsers
On the other hand the horse would not be alive excep for the one who
rides them for sport. There's not many wild horses around hear. - Cappy On Feb 2, 5:18*pm, bluezfolk wrote: On Feb 1, 12:26*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 06:35:41 -0800 (PST), bluezfolk wrote: On Jan 31, 11:09*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: \"I have lived in Marin since the 50s and have been riding horses here -- I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of! http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande Personally I've always considered riding a horse as being cruel to an animal. *Making a 1000 pound horse carry 200 pounds of rider and saddle etc. is like making a 200 pound human carry 40 pounds for no reason. *Try walking around all day with a 40 pound pack on your back, it gets tiring. If tou ACTUALLY cared about horses, which you don't, you would advocate banning mountain biking. 40 pounds for a 200-lb human is quite a light pack! I routinely carry more than 1/4 of my weight for backpacking. You are only demonstrating your ignorance. Eric -- I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of! http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande So make that 50 pounds, but the horse has no choice whether or not to carry it, you do. *I guess you don't really care about horses either, since they aren't "wildlife", just extremely dumb animals. Eric Eric |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Thanks for demonstrating the character of the typical mountain biker! (was Novice Dies from Accident in "Beginner's" Mountain Biking Class!" | Gary S. | Mountain Biking | 0 | May 26th 05 08:48 PM |
What is a "Typical Mountain Biker" I wanna know. | TJ | Mountain Biking | 19 | May 12th 05 12:55 AM |
Death Threat from a Typical Mountain Biker (was Hate Mail from a Typical Mountain Biker) | averal | Social Issues | 0 | April 11th 05 04:47 AM |
Typical Mountain Biker Gives Driver the Finger, Gets Run Into! | the Moderator | Social Issues | 0 | November 29th 04 04:51 PM |
Threat from a Typical Mountain Biker | DaveWV | Mountain Biking | 2 | February 3rd 04 01:55 AM |