Helmet Saves Cavendish

James james.e.steward gmail.com wrote:

Simon Lewis wrote:

If you want to be a net nanny **** off and go elsewhere. Or
ignore this thread. He hit his head and helmet broke. What do
YOU think would have happened had he hit his skull?

I will respond by not answering your question because I think
you are fishing - poorly I might add.

His helmet saved his life.

But... If you have a very thick skull, I mean really thick, as in
Neanderthal thick, you don't need no helmet.

Apparently you don't need no helmet.
--

















I fart in your general direction.

JS.



Path: news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com! news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!ete rnal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: James james.e.steward gmail.com
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Helmet Saves Cavendish
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 11:37:49 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 12
Message-ID: iinet0$s2r$1 news.eternal-september.org
References: iinbqh$uv2$1 news.eternal-september.org iincqq$986$1 news.eternal-september.org iindqq$62c$1 news.eternal-september.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 00:37:53 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="cj4VFbGdBUVk6uQx0hJgbQ"; logging-data="28763"; mail-complaints-to="abuse eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19guJq2dD5l2KXh8ZyTjHbd"
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317)
In-Reply-To: iindqq$62c$1 news.eternal-september.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Xp76s0U1TXkr2/irhg3Z07B8uBQ=

James james.e.steward gmail.com wrote:

Simon Lewis wrote:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/othe...ng/9389057.stm

,----
| The HTC-Highroad sprinter cut and bruised his face, and broke
| his helmet, after bunny-hopping over a speed hump.
`----

If he had reportedly broken wind, would that have saved his
arse?

Can we stand or sit out another helmet war thread?

I think you're just fishing. Please fish elsewhere, for
everyone else sake.

His helmet saved his life.

But... If you have a very thick skull, I mean really thick, as in
Neanderthal thick, you don't need no helmet.

Apparently you don't need no helmet.
--






















JS



Path: news.astraweb.com!border2.newsrouter.astraweb.com!
nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!
feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: James james.e.steward gmail.com
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Helmet Saves Cavendish
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 11:02:34 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 15
Message-ID: iincqq$986$1 news.eternal-september.org
References: iinbqh$uv2$1 news.eternal-september.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 00:02:35 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx03.eternal-september.org; posting-
host="cj4VFbGdBUVk6uQx0hJgbQ"; logging-data="9478"; mail-complaints-
to="abuse eternal-september.org"; posting-
account="U2FsdGVkX1/9RDZqsF4EomkcD2TYJvrc"
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317)
In-Reply-To: iinbqh$uv2$1 news.eternal-september.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Msawo2ovls65roAj7+AtUnGCKWo=

John Doe wrote:
James james.e.steward gmail.com wrote:

Simon Lewis wrote:

If you want to be a net nanny **** off and go elsewhere. Or
ignore this thread. He hit his head and helmet broke. What do
YOU think would have happened had he hit his skull?
I will respond by not answering your question because I think
you are fishing - poorly I might add.

His helmet saved his life.

Prove it.

But... If you have a very thick skull, I mean really thick, as in
Neanderthal thick, you don't need no helmet.

Oh, so even with a thick skull you are saying you still need a helmet.
That's your opinion. You are entitled to it.

Apparently you don't need no helmet.

Yes, I agree, wearing a helmet is a good idea.

Your English is perhaps in need of some adjustment.
When you say "you don't need no helmet", means "you need a helmet".
That's the effect of the double negative. See?

If you are trying to be nasty, you are not good at it. Try harder.

JS.

"James" wrote in message
...
John Doe wrote:
James james.e.steward gmail.com wrote:
Simon Lewis wrote:
If you want to be a net nanny **** off and go elsewhere. Or
ignore this thread. He hit his head and helmet broke. What do
YOU think would have happened had he hit his skull?
I will respond by not answering your question because I think
you are fishing - poorly I might add.

His helmet saved his life.

Prove it.

But... If you have a very thick skull, I mean really thick, as in
Neanderthal thick, you don't need no helmet.

Oh, so even with a thick skull you are saying you still need a helmet.
That's your opinion. You are entitled to it.

Clearly, he made no such claim. All that was said was that "no helmet" is
optional. To which, I can almost agree, even in the presence of MHL.


Apparently you don't need no helmet.

Yes, I agree, wearing a helmet is a good idea.

Your English is perhaps in need of some adjustment.
When you say "you don't need no helmet", means "you need a helmet". That's
the effect of the double negative. See?

If you are trying to be nasty, you are not good at it. Try harder.

Yup. Liberally applied accelerant won't push this damp moss into exothermic
excess. (But I did manage to light steel wool with just a mostly discharged
6V camera battery. Now *that* was somethin'.) Anyone got a light?

On 2/15/2011 9:42 PM, John Doe wrote:
Jamesjames.e.steward gmail.com wrote:

Simon Lewis wrote:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/othe...ng/9389057.stm

,----
| The HTC-Highroad sprinter cut and bruised his face, and broke
| his helmet, after bunny-hopping over a speed hump.
`----

If he had reportedly broken wind, would that have saved his
arse?

Can we stand or sit out another helmet war thread?

I think you're just fishing. Please fish elsewhere, for
everyone else sake.

His helmet saved his life.

But... If you have a very thick skull, I mean really thick, as in
Neanderthal thick, you don't need no helmet.

Apparently you don't need no helmet.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZMmV6xXYFw

"MikeWhy" boat042-nospam yahoo.com wrote:

"James" james.e.steward gmail.com wrote in message
news:ijfe2q$1io$1 news.eternal-september.org...
John Doe wrote:
James james.e.steward gmail.com wrote:
Simon Lewis wrote:
If you want to be a net nanny **** off and go elsewhere. Or
ignore this thread. He hit his head and helmet broke. What do
YOU think would have happened had he hit his skull?
I will respond by not answering your question because I think
you are fishing - poorly I might add.

His helmet saved his life.

Prove it.

Your skull is too thick to believe proof, Neanderthal.

But... If you have a very thick skull, I mean really thick, as in
Neanderthal thick, you don't need no helmet.

Oh, so even with a thick skull you are saying you still need a helmet.
That's your opinion. You are entitled to it.

Clearly, he made no such claim. All that was said was that "no helmet" is
optional. To which, I can almost agree, even in the presence of MHL.


Apparently you don't need no helmet.

Yes, I agree, wearing a helmet is a good idea.

Your English is perhaps in need of some adjustment.
When you say "you don't need no helmet", means "you need a helmet". That's
the effect of the double negative. See?

If you are trying to be nasty, you are not good at it. Try harder.

Yup. Liberally applied accelerant won't push this damp moss into exothermic
excess.

In fact, my English speaking voice is good enough to command and
control my computer, including the ability to dictate everything I
would otherwise have to type like you do. Typing is history here.
I play real-time strategy by voice, competitively. I have helped
define an extremely common English word that you use every day.
And how about you, what do you do in real life? Have you ever even
written anything outside of the Internet? Anything? No, of course
you haven't, Neanderthal.
--














(But I did manage to light steel wool with just a mostly discharged
6V camera battery. Now *that* was somethin'.) Anyone got a light?





Path: news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com! feed.news.qwest.net!mpls-nntp-03.inet.qwest.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!newsfeed.kamp. net!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "MikeWhy" boat042-nospam yahoo.com
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Helmet Saves Cavendish
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 22:49:43 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 41
Message-ID: ijfl18$8qc$1 news.eternal-september.org
References: iindqq$62c$1 news.eternal-september.org iinet0$s2r$1 news.eternal-september.org 4d5b3820$0$27029$c3e8da3$33881b6a news.astraweb.com ijfe2q$1io$1 news.eternal-september.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 04:49:44 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="Sm8b7PDYatT7vjRV8cQewg"; logging-data="9036"; mail-complaints-to="abuse eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/mNfVFat/q/STD7AECgw0F"
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3664
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3664
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/ZaldzLj6zeB2IGROBS/n235VQg=
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal

On 3/18/2011 1:37 PM, John Doe wrote:
"MikeWhy"boat042-nospam yahoo.com wrote:

"James"james.e.steward gmail.com wrote in message
news:ijfe2q$1io$1 news.eternal-september.org...
John Doe wrote:
Jamesjames.e.steward gmail.com wrote:
Simon Lewis wrote:
If you want to be a net nanny **** off and go elsewhere. Or
ignore this thread. He hit his head and helmet broke. What do
YOU think would have happened had he hit his skull?
I will respond by not answering your question because I think
you are fishing - poorly I might add.

His helmet saved his life.

Prove it.

Your skull is too thick to believe proof, Neanderthal.

But... If you have a very thick skull, I mean really thick, as in
Neanderthal thick, you don't need no helmet.

Oh, so even with a thick skull you are saying you still need a helmet.
That's your opinion. You are entitled to it.

Clearly, he made no such claim. All that was said was that "no helmet" is
optional. To which, I can almost agree, even in the presence of MHL.


Apparently you don't need no helmet.

Yes, I agree, wearing a helmet is a good idea.

Your English is perhaps in need of some adjustment.
When you say "you don't need no helmet", means "you need a helmet". That's
the effect of the double negative. See?

If you are trying to be nasty, you are not good at it. Try harder.

Yup. Liberally applied accelerant won't push this damp moss into exothermic
excess.

In fact, my English speaking voice is good enough to command and
control my computer, including the ability to dictate everything I
would otherwise have to type like you do. Typing is history here.
I play real-time strategy by voice, competitively. I have helped
define an extremely common English word that you use every day.
And how about you, what do you do in real life? Have you ever even
written anything outside of the Internet? Anything? No, of course
you haven't, Neanderthal.

Wow - two people afraid to use their real names arguing over who has the
largest genitals.

--
Tºm Shermªn - 42.435731,-83.985007
I am a vehicular cyclist.

On Mar 18, 10:05*pm, Tºm Shermªn™ °_° ""twshermanREMOVE\"@THI
$southslope.net" wrote:

Wow - two people afraid to use their real names arguing over who has the
largest genitals.

I only saw one penis-swinger, John D'Oh!

Hence: "John D'OH! pulled his pants down in front and demonstrated
thus":

In fact, my English speaking voice is good enough to command and
control my computer, including the ability to dictate everything I
would otherwise have to type like you do. Typing is history here.
I play real-time strategy by voice, competitively. I have helped
define an extremely common English word that you use every day.
And how about you, what do you do in real life? Have you ever even
written anything outside of the Internet? Anything? No, of course
you haven't, Neanderthal.

Calling people names does not establish authority, or credibility.
Doesn't matter who you think you are, outside of this ng, either. You
don't "command and control" jack **** around here, bub. Zip, nada nil.

So: prove it ("helmet saved his life"), or shut up, or continue acting
like a jerk. Or: maybe you'll come up with a fourth option, O Wise
One?
--D-y

"dustoyevsky mac.com" dustoyevsky mac.com wrote:

T§m Sherm¦nT ø_ø ""twshermanREMOVE\" THI $southslope.net"
wrote:

Wow - two people afraid to use their real names arguing over
who has the largest genitals.

Some people who beat their chest about using a real name also use
sock puppets. In other words... Beating your chest about using a
real name might help you feel better, but it is meaningless in the
real world.

Calling people names does not establish authority, or
credibility. Doesn't matter who you think you are, outside of
this ng, either.

In other words... You have never done jack **** in real life.

And you need to work on your posting skills, your quoting is
screwed up.

You don't "command and control" jack **** around here, bub. Zip,
nada nil.

I did not say or suggest anything like that, asshole.

Are you even skilled in the bicycle world, asshole?

So: prove it ("helmet saved his life"), or shut up,

Nobody can convince a NEANDERTHAL about anything. Unfortunately,
the rest of us end up paying for your Neanderthal ways when you
seriously injure yourself and come crying for help.

If you want to believe that a helmet will not protect your thick
skull, I could not care less, unless United States tax dollars pay
for spoon feeding your drooling mouth after you have a serious
head injury (more injured than it already is). If you ever have a
serious crash, asshole, please just die. Again, I am assuming you
are young enough to ride a bicycle.

Besides... If you have a really thick skull, as in NEANDERTHAL
THICK, maybe you don't need no helmet.
--

















or continue acting
like a jerk. Or: maybe you'll come up with a fourth option, O Wise
One?
--D-y



Path: news.astraweb.com!border2.newsrouter.astraweb.com! news-out.readnews.com!transit3.readnews.com!postnews.go ogle.com!r4g2000prm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "dustoyevsky mac.com" dustoyevsky mac.com
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Helmet Saves Cavendish
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 10:29:43 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 28
Message-ID: 71eb134d-fe90-4600-8442-24f5542b419c r4g2000prm.googlegroups.com
References: iindqq$62c$1 news.eternal-september.org iinet0$s2r$1 news.eternal-september.org 4d5b3820$0$27029$c3e8da3$33881b6a news.astraweb.com ijfe2q$1io$1 news.eternal-september.org ijfl18$8qc$1 news.eternal-september.org 4d83a67e$0$12879$c3e8da3$9deca2c3 news.astraweb.com im16if$5d9$1 news.eternal-september.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.112.160.76
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1300642183 15775 127.0.0.1 (20 Mar 2011 17:29:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 17:29:43 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
Injection-Info: r4g2000prm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=70.112.160.76; posting-account=_jCCXwkAAAA0lMfyyBH36UhJDuJ3uYIL
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10_4_11; en) AppleWebKit/533.19.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.1.3 Safari/533.19.4,gzip(gfe)

On 5/1/2011 8:05 PM, John Doe WHO? ANONYMOUSLY SNIPES:
"dustoyevsky mac.com"dustoyevsky mac.com wrote:

T�m Sherm�nT �_�""twshermanREMOVE\" THI $southslope.net"
wrote:

Wow - two people afraid to use their real names arguing over
who has the largest genitals.

Some people who beat their chest about using a real name also use
sock puppets. In other words... Beating your chest about using a
real name might help you feel better, but it is meaningless in the
real world.

Calling people names does not establish authority, or
credibility. Doesn't matter who you think you are, outside of
this ng, either.

In other words... You have never done jack **** in real life.

And you need to work on your posting skills, your quoting is
screwed up.

You don't "command and control" jack **** around here, bub. Zip,
nada nil.

I did not say or suggest anything like that, asshole.

Are you even skilled in the bicycle world, asshole?

So: prove it ("helmet saved his life"), or shut up,

Nobody can convince a NEANDERTHAL about anything. Unfortunately,
the rest of us end up paying for your Neanderthal ways when you
seriously injure yourself and come crying for help.

If you want to believe that a helmet will not protect your thick
skull, I could not care less, unless United States tax dollars pay
for spoon feeding your drooling mouth after you have a serious
head injury (more injured than it already is). If you ever have a
serious crash, asshole, please just die. Again, I am assuming you
are young enough to ride a bicycle.

The same old Lidditeâ„¢ trash.

Y Y A W W NN N
Y Y A A W W W N N N
Y Y A A W W W W N N N
Y A A W W W W N N N
Y AAAAAAAAA W W W W N N N
Y A A W W W W N N N
Y A A W W N NN

Besides... If you have a really thick skull, as in NEANDERTHAL
THICK, maybe you don't need no helmet.

And this is the best you could come up with in 5+ weeks?

--
Tºm Shermªn - 42.435731,-83.985007
I am a vehicular cyclist.