Missing Messages from URCM

On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:53:20 +0000, "Just zis Guy, you know?"
wrote:

On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:11:47 -0800 (PST), Simon Brooke
wrote:

What jms really needs is RFC 2549. It would greatly improve the signal
to noise ratio for everyone.

Do I get extra points for knowing what that is without even looking?

Guy


If you wanted to try and prove that you were a big-headed
objectionable ****er - then indeed you do.

Is that one of the areas on which you known as a "thought-leader"?

I recall that you said that something was : "a field in which I am
considered a thought leader by VMware, Dell and EMC."?

How do you know that?

Can anyone do it - did you just write a letter to them and say "do
you consider that I am a thought-leader in wanking for England" - and
they said "yes most certainly".

Is that how it works?




--
Many cyclists are proving the need for registration by their contempt for the Highway Code and laws.

The answer:
All cyclists over 16 to take compulsory test, have compulsory insurance, and be registered.
Registration number to be clearly visible on the back of mandatory hi-viz vest.
Habitual law breakers' cycles confiscated and crushed.
(With thanks to KeithT for the idea)

"Judith M Smith" wrote in message
...

The answer:
All cyclists over 16 to take compulsory test, have compulsory insurance,
and be registered.
Registration number to be clearly visible on the back of mandatory hi-viz
vest.
Habitual law breakers' cycles confiscated and crushed.

Thanks for changing your spelling of "visible". In return here are some more
ideas for you.

1) Compulsory helmet use for all road using cyclists.
2) Must pay a token "road tax" (sic).
3) Must carry number plates (even on Barbie trikes)
4) Must be kept away from "the traffic" on cycle paths.
5) When allowed on the road, must not filter but "wait their turn".
6) No use of earpieces at all. Blue tooth OK for drivers though.
7) Compulsory MOT and insurance.
8) No wearing of clothing to show off their fit bodies as it might upset
lard arsed drivers.
9) No wearing of garish colours in the summer.
10) But bizarrely, no wearing of dark colours either.
11) If no helmet worn, cut their insurance payouts.
12) Must ride as far to the left as possible at all times so cars can pass
even when it's not safe.
13) Must never ride more than one abreast.
14) Racing and time trialling on public roads banned.
15) Mandatory hi-vis. If it flaps about in the wind all the better.

--
Simon Mason
http://www.simonmason.karoo.net/

Please ****-off back to your own place.

On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 12:42:48 -0000, "Simon Mason"
wrote:

snip

Thanks for changing your spelling of "visible". In return here are some more
ideas for you.

1) Compulsory helmet use for all road using cyclists.
I'm still not sure about this yet - I am moving towards it - as are
many people.

2) Must pay a token "road tax" (sic).
Yep

3) Must carry number plates (even on Barbie trikes)
Yep - sort of - via the hi-viz for all over 16

4) Must be kept away from "the traffic" on cycle paths.
Yep - compulsory to use if available

5) When allowed on the road, must not filter but "wait their turn".
The word filter does not appear in the Highway Code - so you are
probably correct.

6) No use of earpieces at all. Blue tooth OK for drivers though.
Earpieces banned for all drivers/cyclists.

7) Compulsory MOT and insurance.
Yep

8) No wearing of clothing to show off their fit bodies as it might upset
lard arsed drivers.
Sorry - had not realised that all cyclists have "fit bodies". Is that
your assessment? Have you seen Marc?

9) No wearing of garish colours in the summer.
Nope disagree - must wear hi-viz at all times

10) But bizarrely, no wearing of dark colours either.
Yep - agree - hi viz at all times.

11) If no helmet worn, cut their insurance payouts.
Spot on

12) Must ride as far to the left as possible at all times so cars can pass
even when it's not safe.
In general yes - keep as far left as is safely possible.

13) Must never ride more than one abreast.
Spot on - why should you?

14) Racing and time trialling on public roads banned.
Most definitely - unless roads closed (at a cost to the cyclists of
course)

15) Mandatory hi-vis. If it flaps about in the wind all the better.
No - registration number MUST be visible - your responsibility.


Looks like we are nearly in agreement.

Many thanks.

--
Many cyclists are proving the need for registration by their contempt for the Highway Code and laws.

The answer:
All cyclists over 16 to take compulsory test, have compulsory insurance, and be registered.
Registration number to be clearly visible on the back of mandatory hi-viz vest.
Habitual law breakers' cycles confiscated and crushed.
(With thanks to KeithT for the idea)

On 1 Dec, 17:09, Judith M Smith wrote:
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 12:42:48 -0000, "Simon Mason"

wrote:
5) When allowed on the road, must not filter but "wait their turn".

The word filter does not appear in the Highway Code - so you are
probably correct.


Does that mean all actions not defined in the HC are against the HC ?

SW

On 1 Dec, 17:09, Judith M Smith wrote:
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 12:42:48 -0000, "Simon Mason"


Looks like we are nearly in agreement.

Many thanks.


My pleasure. Sadly for you and your ilk, none of those rules will
*ever* come to fruition.
Keep dreaming though.

--
Simon Mason

Happi Monday wrote:
Please ****-off back to your own place.

who?

what?

where?



--
Its never too late to reinvent the bicycle

Keitht wrote:
Happi Monday wrote:
Please ****-off back to your own place.

who?

what?

where?

See that anchor that went overboard over there? Well Happi took it right up to
the boat.

On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 09:38:24 -0800 (PST), SW
wrote:

On 1 Dec, 17:09, Judith M Smith wrote:
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 12:42:48 -0000, "Simon Mason"

wrote:
5) When allowed on the road, must not filter but "wait their turn".

The word filter does not appear in the Highway Code - so you are
probably correct.


Does that mean all actions not defined in the HC are against the HC ?

SW



Sorry - I was just saying that I did not understand what the term
"filtering" meant, and I was not aware that it was defined and
approved in the Highway Code - hence I could hardly comment on whether
it meant cyclists should wait their turn


Are you telling me that I am wrong?

--
Many cyclists are proving the need for registration by their contempt for the Highway Code and laws.

The answer:
All cyclists over 16 to take compulsory test, have compulsory insurance, and be registered.
Registration number to be clearly visible on the back of mandatory hi-viz vest.
Habitual law breakers' cycles confiscated and crushed.
(With thanks to KeithT for the idea)

In ,
Judith M Smith tweaked the Babbage-Engine to tell
us:

13) Must never ride more than one abreast.
Spot on - why should you?

To overtake.

Duh.

--
Dave Larrington
http://www.legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk
And then there was light and He thought it was good, so He threw
the receipt away.