#21
|
|||
|
|||
URT sucks?
|
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
URT sucks?
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 02:13:54 -0400, Dave W wrote:
|On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 23:19:10 +0200, "Dave Stocker" wrote: | |"P e t e F a g e r l i n" schrieb im Newsbeitrag . .. | | | The Bow Ti is a Sweet Spot bike----------------URT. | | It's really not that difficult. | | But | |this is a moot, bucause I already said in my last post that I now agree |that | |the Bow Ti is a URT. So what is the problem? | | Hmmm...I would ascribe it to some reading comprehension issues on your | part or an inabilty to understand exactly what "Sweet Spot" means (URT | with the pivot located in the middle, rather than at the extremes). | | |I started this thread hoping to talk a bit about the physics of these |things. Oh well, it was not to be... | |-Dave | |not with that guy it ain't. LOL. Is post humping a congenital defect or something that you learned from your parents or perhaps you picked up your particular flavor of retardation after one too many bowls? Hilarious, regardless of the cause. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
URT sucks?
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 23:19:10 +0200, "Dave Stocker"
wrote: |"P e t e F a g e r l i n" schrieb im Newsbeitrag .. . | | | The Bow Ti is a Sweet Spot bike----------------URT. | | It's really not that difficult. | | But | |this is a moot, bucause I already said in my last post that I now agree |that | |the Bow Ti is a URT. So what is the problem? | | Hmmm...I would ascribe it to some reading comprehension issues on your | part or an inabilty to understand exactly what "Sweet Spot" means (URT | with the pivot located in the middle, rather than at the extremes). | | |I started this thread hoping to talk a bit about the physics of these |things. Oh well, it was not to be... So you usually start discussion, wherein you want to talk about the physiscs of bike suspensions, by posting a bunch of stuff that is inaccurate and based upon supposition? Interesting. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
URT sucks?
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 13:08:24 -0400, Dave W wrote:
| | Haven't you figured that out yet? It's Pete "never wrong" Fagerlin. As | soon as you realize this you'll save yourself a whole lot of crap, | like you just went through. | |While he might not have figured that out, he certainly knows not to |take advice from Dave "always wrong" Wussyass, because banging your |head against the wall is so much more productive. | |He arachnoid, don't you think the advice is sound given what Pete lead |this thread into. Oh, nevermind, I forgot you're a dumbass... ROTFLMAO! "what Pete lead this thread into" Yeah, heaven forbid that someone who has four years of experience riding a Bow Ti comment on how they really ride, rather than letting some inaccurate assumptions stand. Gee, if I hadn't set the record straight, you wouldn't have had a chance to make yourself look like a total fool once again... |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
URT sucks?
Dave W wrote in message . ..
On 27 Jun 2003 09:16:46 -0700, (Spider) wrote: While he might not have figured that out, he certainly knows not to take advice from Dave "always wrong" Wussyass, because banging your head against the wall is so much more productive. He arachnoid, don't you think the advice is sound given what Pete lead this thread into. LOL! He knows a hell of a lot about URTs, considering his bike is one... Oh, nevermind, I forgot you're a dumbass... Considering the amount of useful information you have given to this thread, I'll just chalk it up to more WussyAss irony. Sorry, my mistake. This should be your sig line. It's about the only thing you've ever written that even makes a little bit of sense, or is even relevant, for that matter. Dave (Kiss my wussyass!) I would, but I don't have all day. Spider |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
URT sucks?
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 20:40:52 -0700, P e t e F a g e r l i n
wrote: On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 02:13:54 -0400, Dave W wrote: |On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 23:19:10 +0200, "Dave Stocker" wrote: | |"P e t e F a g e r l i n" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... | | | The Bow Ti is a Sweet Spot bike----------------URT. | | It's really not that difficult. | | But | |this is a moot, bucause I already said in my last post that I now agree |that | |the Bow Ti is a URT. So what is the problem? | | Hmmm...I would ascribe it to some reading comprehension issues on your | part or an inabilty to understand exactly what "Sweet Spot" means (URT | with the pivot located in the middle, rather than at the extremes). | | |I started this thread hoping to talk a bit about the physics of these |things. Oh well, it was not to be... | |-Dave | |not with that guy it ain't. LOL. Is post humping a congenital defect or something that you learned from your parents or perhaps you picked up your particular flavor of retardation after one too many bowls? Just learning from the master. hehehe Hilarious, regardless of the cause. yes you are, no matter where you post! |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
URT sucks?
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 20:47:57 -0700, P e t e F a g e r l i n
wrote: On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 13:08:24 -0400, Dave W wrote: | | Haven't you figured that out yet? It's Pete "never wrong" Fagerlin. As | soon as you realize this you'll save yourself a whole lot of crap, | like you just went through. | |While he might not have figured that out, he certainly knows not to |take advice from Dave "always wrong" Wussyass, because banging your |head against the wall is so much more productive. | |He arachnoid, don't you think the advice is sound given what Pete lead |this thread into. Oh, nevermind, I forgot you're a dumbass... ROTFLMAO! "what Pete lead this thread into" Yeah, heaven forbid that someone who has four years of experience riding a Bow Ti comment on how they really ride, rather than letting some inaccurate assumptions stand. WOW I am impressed. You really are someone with experience. Did it require your particular "patented" Fagerlin response? Abusive bull**** doesn't illustrate your points worth a ****. I appreciated the links you provided for Mr Stocker, really, it was a learning experience. But we could do without your lame ass MTBR diatribes here. But this IS an ALT group, and you're free to "color" your responses any way you want. But as you do, be expecting a reply from someone like me. Gee, if I hadn't set the record straight, you wouldn't have had a chance to make yourself look like a total fool once again... Thanks for setting the record straight then. I really wouldn't want that to happen.....hehehehe Dave (does anyone really care WHAT I look like?) |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
URT sucks?
On Tue, 01 Jul 2003 12:34:43 -0400, Dave W wrote:
|On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 20:47:57 -0700, P e t e F a g e r l i n wrote: |ROTFLMAO! | |"what Pete lead this thread into" | |Yeah, heaven forbid that someone who has four years of experience |riding a Bow Ti comment on how they really ride, rather than letting |some inaccurate assumptions stand. | |WOW I am impressed. You really are someone with experience. Did it |require your particular "patented" Fagerlin response? Abusive bull**** |doesn't illustrate your points worth a ****. LOL! "abusive bull****"? Just when I thought you couldn't get any more idiotic, you come up with this. Are you this fragile in real life? I appreciated the links |you provided for Mr Stocker, really, it was a learning experience. But |we could do without your lame ass MTBR diatribes here. But this IS an |ALT group, and you're free to "color" your responses any way you want. |But as you do, be expecting a reply from someone like me. I always anticipate relies from thin-skinned hypocritical delicate flowers, but thanks for the useless advice anyway p.s. "diatribe"? If you view a discussion of the relative merits of various URts to be a diatribe, you need to go grab a dictionary. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
URT sucks?
On Tue, 01 Jul 2003 12:44:43 -0400, Dave W wrote:
|On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 20:43:46 -0700, P e t e F a g e r l i n wrote: | |On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 02:12:56 -0400, Dave W wrote: | | ||Haven't you figured that out yet? It's Pete "never wrong" Fagerlin. As ||soon as you realize this you'll save yourself a whole lot of crap, ||like you just went through. | |If you had any experience with the Bow Ti, you would understand how |silly the other Dave's assumptions are. | |Since you don't, and you're just post humping again, I guess you're |just in the mood to make yourself look like a total idiot, again. | |p.s. Where have I ever claimed that I'm "never wrong" fruitloop? | |Here's my question for you Petey; Where did I ever say you where |wrong? Uh, Dave, put down the bong and read what you wrote. And go see that doc about the post-humping again. Your latest meds aren't working anymore. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
90 F*CKING SECONDS | James Calivar | General | 69 | August 2nd 04 11:31 PM |
Road or Sidewalk? | K-Man | General | 74 | June 19th 04 12:26 AM |