UCI investigation of Cox's death

scientific autopsy/research of athlete's pathologic conditions
possibly casued by drug use is positive not negative: no good reason
to knee jerk or moralize about it.

On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 22:47:16 -0000, datakoll wrote:


scientific autopsy/research of athlete's pathologic conditions
possibly casued by drug use is positive not negative: no good reason
to knee jerk or moralize about it.

No but if I die young I want detectives to investigate, not the UCI.

Ron

On Aug 6, 7:47 pm, RonSonic wrote:
On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 22:47:16 -0000, datakoll wrote:

scientific autopsy/research of athlete's pathologic conditions
possibly casued by drug use is positive not negative: no good reason
to knee jerk or moralize about it.

No but if I die young I want detectives to investigate, not the UCI.

Ron

Florida Sheriff's cleaner than UCI ??

datakoll wrote:
On Aug 6, 7:47 pm, RonSonic wrote:
On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 22:47:16 -0000, datakoll wrote:

scientific autopsy/research of athlete's pathologic conditions
possibly casued by drug use is positive not negative: no good reason
to knee jerk or moralize about it.
No but if I die young I want detectives to investigate, not the UCI.

Ron

Florida Sheriff's cleaner than UCI ??


Yeah. Even Alabama Sheriffs.

In article ,
RonSonic wrote:

On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 22:47:16 -0000, datakoll wrote:


scientific autopsy/research of athlete's pathologic conditions
possibly casued by drug use is positive not negative: no good reason
to knee jerk or moralize about it.

No but if I die young I want detectives to investigate, not the UCI.

Oh, so you want detectives, not defectives. The nerve...

--
tanx,
Howard

Never take a tenant with a monkey.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:59:56 -0000, datakoll wrote:

On Aug 6, 7:47 pm, RonSonic wrote:
On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 22:47:16 -0000, datakoll wrote:

scientific autopsy/research of athlete's pathologic conditions
possibly casued by drug use is positive not negative: no good reason
to knee jerk or moralize about it.

No but if I die young I want detectives to investigate, not the UCI.

Ron

Florida Sheriff's cleaner than UCI ??

If I had to bet... yeah. At least I understand the sheriffs and which way they
bend. UCI, I haven't a damn clue what's wrong with them.

Ron

On Aug 6, 3:47 pm, datakoll wrote:
scientific autopsy/research of athlete's pathologic conditions
possibly casued by drug use is positive not negative: no good reason
to knee jerk or moralize about it.


An autopsy or investigation in the case of a
healthy person who dies unsually young is fine,
and often SOP. However, an investigation that
begins with the preconception that it's looking
for signs of a condition caused by drug use is,
surprise, very possibly going to turn up signs
of drug use, whether real or not. There are a
lot of conditions that could be caused by any
number of factors, including drugs or something
else; yet if you already have an answer in your
head, it tends to crowd out the alternatives.

On Aug 7, 9:21 pm, "
wrote:
On Aug 6, 3:47 pm, datakoll wrote:

scientific autopsy/research of athlete's pathologic conditions
possibly casued by drug use is positive not negative: no good reason
to knee jerk or moralize about it.

An autopsy or investigation in the case of a
healthy person who dies unsually young is fine,
and often SOP. However, an investigation that
begins with the preconception that it's looking
for signs of a condition caused by drug use is,
surprise, very possibly going to turn up signs
of drug use, whether real or not. There are a
lot of conditions that could be caused by any
number of factors, including drugs or something
else; yet if you already have an answer in your
head, it tends to crowd out the alternatives.

Dumbass,

Those WMDs have got to be somewhere.

On Aug 7, 4:12 pm, wrote:
On Aug 7, 9:21 pm, "
wrote:





On Aug 6, 3:47 pm, datakoll wrote:

scientific autopsy/research of athlete's pathologic conditions
possibly casued by drug use is positive not negative: no good reason
to knee jerk or moralize about it.

An autopsy or investigation in the case of a
healthy person who dies unsually young is fine,
and often SOP. However, an investigation that
begins with the preconception that it's looking
for signs of a condition caused by drug use is,
surprise, very possibly going to turn up signs
of drug use, whether real or not. There are a
lot of conditions that could be caused by any
number of factors, including drugs or something
else; yet if you already have an answer in your
head, it tends to crowd out the alternatives.

Dumbass,

Those WMDs have got to be somewhere.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

cox is a white rat