#11
|
|||
|
|||
LANDIS! Lying?
|
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
LANDIS! Lying?
D2 wrote:
Well, I don't know about Armstrong or Landis vis a vis the doping scandals but I'm fairly certain that if a recreational rider could get their hands on the dope you're obviously taking, they could pedal to the moon on a rusty Huffy. Get well soon. PS Lay off the CAPS, it makes you read like a troll . . . . .oh, nevermind. It has been brought to attention medically that heavy dopers, weight lifters in particular, set themselves up for all kinds of problems later in life, like early heart attacks, strokes, and things that you would normally expect to happen to much older people. Is winning worth 10 or more years off your lifetime? Bill Baka |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
LANDIS! Lying?
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:21:24 GMT, Bill Baka wrote:
D2 wrote: Well, I don't know about Armstrong or Landis vis a vis the doping scandals but I'm fairly certain that if a recreational rider could get their hands on the dope you're obviously taking, they could pedal to the moon on a rusty Huffy. Get well soon. PS Lay off the CAPS, it makes you read like a troll . . . . .oh, nevermind. It has been brought to attention medically that heavy dopers, weight lifters in particular, set themselves up for all kinds of problems later in life, like early heart attacks, strokes, and things that you would normally expect to happen to much older people. Is winning worth 10 or more years off your lifetime? A lot of competitive cyclists are set up to have health problems right now. Guys like Rasmussen and Hamilton are simply not healthy. Frankly I'd consider being a doped GC man like basso or ullrich to be healthier than being an impaired immune system, low bone density skeletal climber. Ron |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
LANDIS! Lying?
RonSonic wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:21:24 GMT, Bill Baka wrote: D2 wrote: Well, I don't know about Armstrong or Landis vis a vis the doping scandals but I'm fairly certain that if a recreational rider could get their hands on the dope you're obviously taking, they could pedal to the moon on a rusty Huffy. Get well soon. PS Lay off the CAPS, it makes you read like a troll . . . . .oh, nevermind. It has been brought to attention medically that heavy dopers, weight lifters in particular, set themselves up for all kinds of problems later in life, like early heart attacks, strokes, and things that you would normally expect to happen to much older people. Is winning worth 10 or more years off your lifetime? A lot of competitive cyclists are set up to have health problems right now. Guys like Rasmussen and Hamilton are simply not healthy. Frankly I'd consider being a doped GC man like basso or ullrich to be healthier than being an impaired immune system, low bone density skeletal climber. Ron I don't even like to take Aspirin, although my doctor recommended it after my Cholesterol came in at 201. Who is he kidding? 201 is high? Bill Baka |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
LANDIS! Lying?
Bill Baka wrote: It has been brought to attention medically that heavy dopers, weight lifters in particular, set themselves up for all kinds of problems later in life, like early heart attacks, strokes, and things that you would normally expect to happen to much older people. Is winning worth 10 or more years off your lifetime? Working 16-hour days, not eating well, and not exercising, which might fairly be said to be the *real* (remember paradigms?) of the working world-- what's so freaking healthy about that? It wasn't too long ago that the 65 year old mandatory retirement age saved employers a lot of money. Damn Boomers. Slacked and survived... --D-y |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
LANDIS! Lying?
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
LANDIS! Lying?
And do you even fully believe Lance's cancer survival stories? Like overcoming BRAIN cancer? Firstly, it was testicular, not brain, cancer. Of course, that is the part of the body that most men seem to think with, so maybe that's a moot point. Secondly, this wasn't faked. Only a whacko conspiracy theorist would think that dozens of medical personnel would risk their licenses, the reputation of the hospitals for which they work, and their professional reputations by lying about a high-profile medical case. Or that such a deception could possibly be carried of - for YEARS - without somebody spilling it all to the public. Sojourner |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
LANDIS! Lying?
Sojourner wrote: Firstly, it was testicular, not brain, cancer. Of course, that is the part of the body that most men seem to think with, so maybe that's a moot point. Nyuk nyuk. Good 'un. Testicular cancer, brain lesions (cancer), lungs. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lance_Armstrong Lance has talked about the lack of research into metastasis IRT the LAF. --D-y |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
LANDIS! Lying?
Qui si parla Campagnolo-www.vecchios.com wrote:
Did ya see that Floyd was reported to have artificial Testasterone in him?? CYA Floyd!! Easier to charge sabotage and/or contamination? PS: "Testasterone" -- hormone produced by driving a really fast Italian car? :-P |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
LANDIS! Lying?
Sojourner wrote:
And do you even fully believe Lance's cancer survival stories? Like overcoming BRAIN cancer? Firstly, it was testicular, not brain, cancer. It spread throughout his body, including brain, lungs and lymph nodes IIRC. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
LANDIS! Lying? | [email protected] | Techniques | 78 | August 27th 06 09:53 PM |
LANDIS! Lying? | [email protected] | General | 64 | August 8th 06 04:20 AM |
Absurd Landis "analysis" in media | Mike Jacoubowsky | Racing | 28 | July 30th 06 11:50 AM |
Eddy, Landis | Crescentius Vespasianus | Racing | 5 | July 21st 06 03:04 PM |
Will Lance LeMond Landis? | Callistus Valerius | Racing | 1 | July 18th 06 04:37 AM |