|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Clear threat to kill from a racist cyclist
On 28/09/2017 18:20, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Jester wrote: On Thursday, September 28, 2017 at 5:42:49 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: Yip, I detest cyclists Why? I'm sure that over the years you will have read my reasons. Bait not taken. You would need to be a hermit on a deserted island with no roads or outside communications to be unaware of how truly dreadful cyclists have become. |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Clear threat to kill from a racist cyclist
Simon Jester wrote:
On Thursday, September 28, 2017 at 6:20:38 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: Simon Jester wrote: On Thursday, September 28, 2017 at 5:42:49 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: Yip, I detest cyclists Why? I'm sure that over the years you will have read my reasons. I haven't. Never mind. Bait not taken. No bait, just a genuine question. ********. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Clear threat to kill from a racist cyclist
MrCheerful wrote:
On 28/09/2017 18:20, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: Simon Jester wrote: On Thursday, September 28, 2017 at 5:42:49 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: Yip, I detest cyclists Why? I'm sure that over the years you will have read my reasons. Bait not taken. You would need to be a hermit on a deserted island with no roads or outside communications to be unaware of how truly dreadful cyclists have become. Or be a silly cyclist. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Clear threat to kill from a racist cyclist
On Thursday, September 28, 2017 at 7:51:33 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Jester wrote: On Thursday, September 28, 2017 at 6:20:38 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: Simon Jester wrote: On Thursday, September 28, 2017 at 5:42:49 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: Yip, I detest cyclists Why? I'm sure that over the years you will have read my reasons. I haven't. Never mind. Bait not taken. No bait, just a genuine question. ********. I have never met you. If we passed each other on foot you would not detest me. If we passed each other in our cars you would not detest me. If I were on foot and you were in your car you would not detest me. If you were on foot and I were in my car you would not detest me. So why does it make a difference if I use a bicycle? |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Clear threat to kill from a racist cyclist
On 28/09/2017 20:12, Simon Jester wrote:
On Thursday, September 28, 2017 at 7:51:33 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: Simon Jester wrote: On Thursday, September 28, 2017 at 6:20:38 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: Simon Jester wrote: On Thursday, September 28, 2017 at 5:42:49 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: Yip, I detest cyclists Why? I'm sure that over the years you will have read my reasons. I haven't. Never mind. Bait not taken. No bait, just a genuine question. ********. I have never met you. If we passed each other on foot you would not detest me. If we passed each other in our cars you would not detest me. If I were on foot and you were in your car you would not detest me. If you were on foot and I were in my car you would not detest me. So why does it make a difference if I use a bicycle? It's a psychological problem. He hates many things, amongst them are Australians/people who live in council houses and Park Homes/ southerners/cyclists/cats/coloured people. He is also a snob. -- Bod |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Clear threat to kill from a racist cyclist
On 29/09/2017 11:03, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 06:20:42 +0100, Bod wrote: On 28/09/2017 20:12, Simon Jester wrote: On Thursday, September 28, 2017 at 7:51:33 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: Simon Jester wrote: On Thursday, September 28, 2017 at 6:20:38 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: Simon Jester wrote: On Thursday, September 28, 2017 at 5:42:49 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: Yip, I detest cyclists Why? I'm sure that over the years you will have read my reasons. I haven't. Never mind. Bait not taken. No bait, just a genuine question. ********. I have never met you. If we passed each other on foot you would not detest me. If we passed each other in our cars you would not detest me. If I were on foot and you were in your car you would not detest me. If you were on foot and I were in my car you would not detest me. So why does it make a difference if I use a bicycle? It's a psychological problem. He hates many things, amongst them are Australians/people who live in council houses and Park Homes/ southerners/cyclists/cats/coloured people. He is also a snob. A northern snob, which I thought was a contradiction in terms.* I put it to you that he's actually a southerner! Well he certainly doesn't sound like your typical friendly northerner. We have several northern neighbours and they are all nice people and we all get along harmoniously. -- Bod |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson" LOL), the Sociopathic Attention Whore
On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 11:03:33 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
the pathological attention whore of all the uk ngs, blathered again: It's a psychological problem. He hates many things, amongst them are Australians/people who live in council houses and Park Homes/ southerners/cyclists/cats/coloured people. He is also a snob. A northern snob, which I thought was a contradiction in terms. I put it to you that he's actually a southerner! Beats being a northern ****** like you are, Birdbrain! -- Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson") about himself: "I can sleep outside in a temperature of -20C wearing only shorts". "I once took a dump behind some bushes and slid down a hill to wipe my arse". (Courtesy of Mr Pounder) |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson" LOL), the Sociopathic Attention Whore
On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 15:01:03 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
the pathological attention whore of all the uk ngs, blathered again: Funny you you should say that. Friends of my neighbour live near Ilkley in Yorkshire. They say everyone IN Ilkley is rude, especially when driving. What did they have to say about YOU, Birdbrain? Did or didn't they let on that they knew you were an abnormal social misfit and ******? -- More of Scottish ****** Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) sociopathic "thinking": "No, law abiding ****wits follow the speed limit. Sensible drivers ignore it and go slower or faster than it, according to the conditions." MID: |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Clear threat to kill from a racist cyclist
On 28/09/17 12:21, JNugent wrote:
On 28/09/2017 08:42, TMS320 wrote: On 27/09/17 15:10, JNugent wrote: 6. The cyclist broke the law (what a shock!) by failing to comply with a give-way sign and carriageway marking. What law? Te Road Traffic ACts. OK. I haven't noticed the Highway Code pointing to references before. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2...lation/16/made "No vehicle shall cross the transverse line shown in diagram 1003 nearer to the major road at the side of which that line is placed, or if that line is not clearly visible, enter that major road, so as to be likely to endanger the driver of or any passenger in any other vehicle or to cause that driver to change the speed or course of his vehicle in order to avoid an accident." In other words, anybody that has ever taken a wheeled vehicle on the road has broken this law. I wonder what the penalty is and whether anybody has *ever* been successfully prosecuted for it when a crash has not occurred. At least the Highway Code is pragmatic about it and accepts that people (not just on bicycles) pull out and instructs that allowances should be made. It doesn't surprise anyone to hear that cyclists don't know that it is compulsory to cede priority at such points. The taxi driver was first up with the abuse by sounding the horn incorrectly and unnecessarily. Then the silly driver decided to stop for a chat. Not the issue at all. The cyclist's typically arrogant faiulure/refusal to obey the law is the issue. It is the issue. Read the thread title. The driver put it on himself: he did not need to hoot and he did not need to stop for a chat. He would not have had it been another motor vehicle. It was a perfectly routine and straightfoward situation. Unfortunately, that is more true than false. It is very common for cyclists to break the law. But fortunately cyclist behaviour rarely endangers others. Most people just carry on and don't worry about it. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Clear threat to kill from a racist cyclist
TMS320 wrote:
On 28/09/17 12:21, JNugent wrote: On 28/09/2017 08:42, TMS320 wrote: On 27/09/17 15:10, JNugent wrote: 6. The cyclist broke the law (what a shock!) by failing to comply with a give-way sign and carriageway marking. What law? Te Road Traffic ACts. OK. I haven't noticed the Highway Code pointing to references before. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2...lation/16/made "No vehicle shall cross the transverse line shown in diagram 1003 nearer to the major road at the side of which that line is placed, or if that line is not clearly visible, enter that major road, so as to be likely to endanger the driver of or any passenger in any other vehicle or to cause that driver to change the speed or course of his vehicle in order to avoid an accident." In other words, anybody that has ever taken a wheeled vehicle on the road has broken this law. I wonder what the penalty is and whether anybody has *ever* been successfully prosecuted for it when a crash has not occurred. At least the Highway Code is pragmatic about it and accepts that people (not just on bicycles) pull out and instructs that allowances should be made. It doesn't surprise anyone to hear that cyclists don't know that it is compulsory to cede priority at such points. The taxi driver was first up with the abuse by sounding the horn incorrectly and unnecessarily. Then the silly driver decided to stop for a chat. Not the issue at all. The cyclist's typically arrogant faiulure/refusal to obey the law is the issue. It is the issue. Read the thread title. The driver put it on himself: he did not need to hoot and he did not need to stop for a chat. He would not have had it been another motor vehicle. It was a perfectly routine and straightfoward situation. Unfortunately, that is more true than false. It is very common for cyclists to break the law. But fortunately cyclist behaviour rarely endangers others. Most people just carry on and don't worry about it. Most people detest cyclists. Just look on any press reports of pedestrians being hurt by law breaking cyclists. Take a look at the comments and then take your head out of your arse and see if you can handle the scorn and dislike that most people have for scum cyclists. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cyclist tries to kill child in pushchair | MrCheerful | UK | 4 | April 29th 17 10:52 AM |
Cyclist find his vehicle blown up as terror threat | Simon Mason[_4_] | UK | 1 | November 29th 16 07:56 AM |
Impatient scum reported for kill threat | Alycidon | UK | 9 | March 16th 16 10:16 AM |
Keltbray Kill Cyclist | Tom Crispin | UK | 133 | March 15th 10 07:50 PM |
Police kill cyclist | MSeries | UK | 22 | July 14th 04 01:27 PM |