|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
TMS 320 finally admits that cyclists are sponging freeloaders!
"Peter Keller" wrote in message ... On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 13:17:45 +0100, The Medway Handyman wrote: no normal person is jealous of cyclists. Thank the Lord that I am not a normal person. There is no way anyone could describe you as normal. |
Ads |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
TMS 320 finally admits that cyclists are sponging freeloaders!
On 19/04/2015 20:47, JNugent wrote:
On 19/04/2015 20:27, Ronnie wrote: On 19/04/2015 19:42, The Medway Handyman wrote: On 19/04/2015 17:55, Ronnie wrote: Don't be silly, no normal person is jealous of cyclists. They should pay their way. How? By paying an annual fee. We could call it 'Road Tax'. It could cover the cost of compulsory registration plates for cyclists and ensure they were insured and properly regulated. Then, if cyclists demand special features on roads, the tax could be increased to cover the costs and stop them mumping on others.. I reiterate, cyclists *aren't* requ to pay road, they ride on the roads legally. But they SHOULD be made to pay their way. *How* can they pay road tax if it's not a requirement? It SHOULD be a requirement. You are just basically whingeing. Basically wanting sponging freeloaders to pay for things they use. They are abiding by the tax laws. *Why* are you having a go at cyclists? It's the government that you should be moaning about. Because cyclists are road lice. You're another Mr Pounder. Both gentleman are pretty certain to take that as a compliment. I did :-) Did you mean it as an insult? -- Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
TMS 320 finally admits that cyclists are sponging freeloaders!
On 20/04/2015 03:26, Phil W Lee wrote:
Here we go again, Matron must have forgotten his medication again. Wel, of course motorists only use public highways by permit, not right - so conditions can be imposed on them to contribute towards the damage, pollution, wear and tear, carnage, policing, community destruction, and so on that they cause. Only non-motorised vehicles, equestrians, and pedestrians enjoy a right-of-way on public highways, and as a right, it cannot be charged for or made conditional, any more than your right to vote, emmigrate (if you can find a country willing to have you), or many other things which are rights. Without such rights-of-way basic human rights such as freedom of association and religeon, access to food, etc would be infringed. Motorists should regard themselves as extremely fortunate tha they are even permitted on public highways despite the clear and continuous danger to life and limb that they impose and the filth that they spew from their engines, and even more fortunate that such use is subidised by the taxpayer, even those taxpayers that choose not to use motor vehicles. £46 billion a year in taxes. £10 billion spent of roads. What a subsidy! It's entirely possible for the whinging motorists to build their own network of roads (they could call them "motorways"), paralleling the public highways (as long as they didn't interfere with access to those public highways), and stay off ours. Oh, hang on a minute. . . Hand on a minute - we already have. Now the sponging, freeloading cyclists want to use them as well. -- Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
TMS 320 finally admits that cyclists are sponging freeloader!
On 20/04/2015 08:59, TMS320 wrote:
"RJH" wrote in Not sure where you get your 'jealous' thesis from - Handyman Research? :-) Handyman complains that there is no specific tax to use a bicycle on public roads so has this idea that people taking this choice have joined some sort of priviledged club that he is excluded from. It's like talking to a child. Being a cyclist isn't a privileged, it's a social & mental disability. Common sense excludes me from this sub culture called cyclists. As a motorist, I don't mind paying for facilities I use. Cyclists should do the same. -- Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
TMS 320 finally admits that cyclists are sponging freeloaders!
On 20/04/2015 18:43, The Medway Handyman wrote:
On 19/04/2015 20:47, JNugent wrote: On 19/04/2015 20:27, Ronnie wrote: On 19/04/2015 19:42, The Medway Handyman wrote: On 19/04/2015 17:55, Ronnie wrote: Don't be silly, no normal person is jealous of cyclists. They should pay their way. How? By paying an annual fee. We could call it 'Road Tax'. It could cover the cost of compulsory registration plates for cyclists and ensure they were insured and properly regulated. Then, if cyclists demand special features on roads, the tax could be increased to cover the costs and stop them mumping on others.. I reiterate, cyclists *aren't* requ to pay road, they ride on the roads legally. But they SHOULD be made to pay their way. *How* can they pay road tax if it's not a requirement? It SHOULD be a requirement. You are just basically whingeing. Basically wanting sponging freeloaders to pay for things they use. They are abiding by the tax laws. *Why* are you having a go at cyclists? It's the government that you should be moaning about. Because cyclists are road lice. You're another Mr Pounder. Both gentleman are pretty certain to take that as a compliment. I did :-) Did you mean it as an insult? Just an observation. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
TMS 320 finally admits that cyclists are sponging freeloader!
On 20/04/2015 18:49, The Medway Handyman wrote:
On 20/04/2015 08:59, TMS320 wrote: "RJH" wrote in Not sure where you get your 'jealous' thesis from - Handyman Research? :-) Handyman complains that there is no specific tax to use a bicycle on public roads so has this idea that people taking this choice have joined some sort of priviledged club that he is excluded from. It's like talking to a child. Being a cyclist isn't a privileged, it's a social & mental disability. Common sense excludes me from this sub culture called cyclists. As a motorist, I don't mind paying for facilities I use. Cyclists should do the same. Explain how they can pay tax when they don't legally have to? |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
TMS 320 finally admits that cyclists are sponging freeloader!
On 20/04/2015 19:50, Bod wrote:
On 20/04/2015 18:49, The Medway Handyman wrote: On 20/04/2015 08:59, TMS320 wrote: "RJH" wrote in Not sure where you get your 'jealous' thesis from - Handyman Research? :-) Handyman complains that there is no specific tax to use a bicycle on public roads so has this idea that people taking this choice have joined some sort of priviledged club that he is excluded from. It's like talking to a child. Being a cyclist isn't a privileged, it's a social & mental disability. Common sense excludes me from this sub culture called cyclists. As a motorist, I don't mind paying for facilities I use. Cyclists should do the same. Explain how they can pay tax when they don't legally have to? I've already said this several times, please try to keep up. Cyclists SHOULD pay. We need the law changed. Vote UKIP. -- Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
TMS 320 finally admits that cyclists are sponging freeloader!
On 20/04/2015 20:06, The Medway Handyman wrote:
On 20/04/2015 19:50, Bod wrote: On 20/04/2015 18:49, The Medway Handyman wrote: On 20/04/2015 08:59, TMS320 wrote: "RJH" wrote in Not sure where you get your 'jealous' thesis from - Handyman Research? :-) Handyman complains that there is no specific tax to use a bicycle on public roads so has this idea that people taking this choice have joined some sort of priviledged club that he is excluded from. It's like talking to a child. Being a cyclist isn't a privileged, it's a social & mental disability. Common sense excludes me from this sub culture called cyclists. As a motorist, I don't mind paying for facilities I use. Cyclists should do the same. Explain how they can pay tax when they don't legally have to? I've already said this several times, please try to keep up. Cyclists SHOULD pay. We need the law changed. Vote UKIP. I am voting for UKIP. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
TMS 320 finally admits that cyclists are sponging freeloaders!
"The Medway Handyman" wrote in message ... On 19/04/2015 20:47, JNugent wrote: On 19/04/2015 20:27, Ronnie wrote: On 19/04/2015 19:42, The Medway Handyman wrote: On 19/04/2015 17:55, Ronnie wrote: Don't be silly, no normal person is jealous of cyclists. They should pay their way. How? By paying an annual fee. We could call it 'Road Tax'. It could cover the cost of compulsory registration plates for cyclists and ensure they were insured and properly regulated. Then, if cyclists demand special features on roads, the tax could be increased to cover the costs and stop them mumping on others.. I reiterate, cyclists *aren't* requ to pay road, they ride on the roads legally. But they SHOULD be made to pay their way. *How* can they pay road tax if it's not a requirement? It SHOULD be a requirement. You are just basically whingeing. Basically wanting sponging freeloaders to pay for things they use. They are abiding by the tax laws. *Why* are you having a go at cyclists? It's the government that you should be moaning about. Because cyclists are road lice. You're another Mr Pounder. Both gentleman are pretty certain to take that as a compliment. I did :-) I'm flattered. Did you mean it as an insult? -- Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
TMS 320 finally admits that cyclists are sponging freeloaders!
"Bod" wrote in message ... On 20/04/2015 18:43, The Medway Handyman wrote: On 19/04/2015 20:47, JNugent wrote: On 19/04/2015 20:27, Ronnie wrote: On 19/04/2015 19:42, The Medway Handyman wrote: On 19/04/2015 17:55, Ronnie wrote: Don't be silly, no normal person is jealous of cyclists. They should pay their way. How? By paying an annual fee. We could call it 'Road Tax'. It could cover the cost of compulsory registration plates for cyclists and ensure they were insured and properly regulated. Then, if cyclists demand special features on roads, the tax could be increased to cover the costs and stop them mumping on others.. I reiterate, cyclists *aren't* requ to pay road, they ride on the roads legally. But they SHOULD be made to pay their way. *How* can they pay road tax if it's not a requirement? It SHOULD be a requirement. You are just basically whingeing. Basically wanting sponging freeloaders to pay for things they use. They are abiding by the tax laws. *Why* are you having a go at cyclists? It's the government that you should be moaning about. Because cyclists are road lice. You're another Mr Pounder. Both gentleman are pretty certain to take that as a compliment. I did :-) Did you mean it as an insult? Just an observation. ********. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unlit cyclist attacks motorist with bicycle | Mrcheerful | UK | 251 | April 22nd 15 01:27 AM |
one unlit cyclist per minute | Mrcheerful[_2_] | UK | 0 | November 4th 11 06:02 PM |
OT unlit cyclist dies in the middle of a very main road | Mrcheerful[_2_] | UK | 1 | February 17th 11 04:00 PM |
He should have mown the unlit cyclist down. | Mrcheerful[_2_] | UK | 12 | June 14th 10 12:24 PM |
Hollywood bus driver attacks cyclist, LAPD handcuffs cyclist | Matt O'Toole | General | 13 | September 29th 07 07:50 PM |