|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
SEE IMPERIAL DAM
On Nov 19, 1:32*pm, kolldata wrote:
ITS B. SORENSEN *!! http://travel.sulekha.com/india/raja.../elephant-para... Which one? They all look alike. JS. |
Ads |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
SEE IMPERIAL DAM
you missed the point. how's the gizmoid coming alog ? |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
SEE IMPERIAL DAM
On Nov 19, 2:01*pm, kolldata wrote:
you missed the point. how's the gizmoid coming alog ? Sorry mate, I only catch a small portion of your points. Must be tuned to different channels. Gizmoid? J. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Bicyclist Fatalities in AZ 2009
On Nov 18, 2:37 pm, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On Nov 18, 5:23 pm, James wrote: On Nov 19, 4:11 am, Frank Krygowski wrote: On Nov 18, 6:32 am, James wrote: Dear Carl, Why is it that we tend to focus on the death statistics and overlook the serious injuries? Another reason is that counts of fatalities and counts of serious injuries tend to move in parallel. However when there is a small sample of deaths there will likely be a much larger sample of serious injuries, hence better data statistically speaking. Perhaps, if you can find the data at all. Another problem - related to what I've already mentioned - is that even if a definition is agreed upon, there is a spectrum of "serious" injury. A broken collarbone would probably meet most definitions of "serious," but it's in a completely different league than, say, a collapsed lung or an amputated leg. I just skimmed the paper Jay linked. I see that their definition of "serious traumatic event" was "any medical treatment sought." So if a person falls and skins his knee and he (or his mommie) says "I want the doctor to clean that," it becomes a "serious" injury. If he cleans it himself, it's not serious. That indicates the data isn't necessarily better. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11220713 |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
SEE IMPERIAL DAM
On Nov 18, 7:05 pm, James wrote:
On Nov 19, 2:01 pm, kolldata wrote: you missed the point. how's the gizmoid coming alog ? Sorry mate, I only catch a small portion of your points. Must be tuned to different channels. Gizmoid? The thing you were making. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
SEE IMPERIAL DAM
the casualties are elsewhere like Feenix ? Feenix has a 110% negative
rating outside of same. what I see are very long sight lines. no shoulders off course exceptin the dirt berm averaing maybe 3-4 miles of it each side but then some riders fight for it so there you have it. Most Desert people I've met tend tube ill tempered but maybe that's my fault. My count is a good 70% are borderline nuerotics. Its the heat ? The irrigation systems are fascinating. Green water cooling thru the barren desert, whispering reeds: peaceful like a large cathedral. Riding is like that. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Tom Sherman is doing that thing that gets past kill files
"Bill Sornson" writes:
?... http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&q=http://social.answers.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/w7network/thread/3f4b7a1f-1dfb-448c-b187-2fdb1f9d1c35&usg=AFQjCNHiF9bIrjQGcVEMb76EFVauGB6Zp A |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
SEE IMPERIAL DAM
On Nov 18, 7:18 pm, kolldata wrote:
On Nov 18, 7:15 pm, kolldata wrote: the casualties are elsewhere like Feenix ? Feenix has a 110% negative rating outside of same. what I see are very long sight lines. no shoulders off course exceptin the dirt berm averaing maybe 3-4 miles of it each side but then some riders fight for it so there you have it. Most Desert people I've met tend tube ill tempered but maybe that's my fault. My count is a good 70% are borderline nuerotics. Its the heat ? The irrigation systems are fascinating. Green water cooling thru the barren desert, whispering reeds: peaceful like a large cathedral. Riding is like that. forgot http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=...hots.com/12/9/... Wow! That is awesome! Thanks for the new wallpaper :-) snip |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Bicyclist Fatalities in AZ 2009
On Nov 17, 9:52*pm, "Tom Sherman °_° --"
wrote: On 11/17/2010 9:21 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote: [...] Yep, it's a psychological thing. *People have greater fear for rare events that they can't do anything about, than they do for common events that they _could_ control, but don't. *That's why people are irrationally afraid of commercial aviation, but not of far riskier motoring. butbutbut, you do not have to deal with TSA goons while motoring. -- Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007 I am a vehicular cyclist. yeah butbutbut yawl don't havum in your backyard either. you fail to understand the problem. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
SEE IMPERIAL DAM
On Nov 19, 2:10*pm, Dan O wrote:
On Nov 18, 7:05 pm, James wrote: On Nov 19, 2:01 pm, kolldata wrote: you missed the point. how's the gizmoid coming alog ? Sorry mate, I only catch a small portion of your points. *Must be tuned to different channels. Gizmoid? The thing you were making. Thanks, Dan. I feel like blind deer that is not moving. JS. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Reduce fatalities or danger rates instead? | Doug[_3_] | UK | 3 | September 19th 10 08:05 AM |
Three cycling fatalities in London last month. | Daniel Barlow | UK | 4 | July 7th 09 12:58 PM |
Child cyclist fatalities in London | Tom Crispin | UK | 13 | October 11th 08 05:12 PM |
Car washes for cyclist fatalities | Bobby | Social Issues | 4 | October 11th 04 07:13 PM |
web-site on road fatalities | cfsmtb | Australia | 4 | April 23rd 04 09:21 AM |