A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Techniques
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Seoul Cycle Design Competition Winner



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #131  
Old December 9th 10, 07:19 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Doc O'Leary[_15_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 20
Default Insular roadie rubbish about seats/saddles

In article ,
Tºm Shermªn™ °_° " wrote:

Well, I have been in exactly one (1) LBS in the US where they both have
fully equipped commuter bicycles for sale on the shop floor and would
not act with at least some disdain when inquired about them.


Again, and? I even noted that many bike shops in the US are poorly run,
but you can probably look at the culture they exist in to see why. I
mean, who do you think they *expect* to be coming in looking for a
comfort bike? Someone with a lot of cash to spend now and in the
future, or someone who is just looking to "try out" biking by buying the
lowest-margin thing they can find and then stick it in the back of the
garage after 1 month?

You can't run a business supplying comfort bikes if the demand just
isn't there. If the industry had half a clue they'd be taking more
long-term steps to shift the balance over by fitting cycling in with the
existing culture. Instead, they're doing short-term targeting of the
existing high-end recreational market.

--
iPhone apps that matter: http://appstore.subsume.com/
My personal UDP list: 127.0.0.1, localhost, googlegroups.com, astraweb.com,
and probably your server, too.
Ads
  #132  
Old December 9th 10, 07:37 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Duane Hébert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 384
Default Insular roadie rubbish about seats/saddles

On 12/9/2010 2:19 PM, Doc O'Leary wrote:
In ,
Tºm Shermªn™ " wrote:

Well, I have been in exactly one (1) LBS in the US where they both have
fully equipped commuter bicycles for sale on the shop floor and would
not act with at least some disdain when inquired about them.


Again, and? I even noted that many bike shops in the US are poorly run,
but you can probably look at the culture they exist in to see why. I
mean, who do you think they *expect* to be coming in looking for a
comfort bike? Someone with a lot of cash to spend now and in the
future, or someone who is just looking to "try out" biking by buying the
lowest-margin thing they can find and then stick it in the back of the
garage after 1 month?

You can't run a business supplying comfort bikes if the demand just
isn't there. If the industry had half a clue they'd be taking more
long-term steps to shift the balance over by fitting cycling in with the
existing culture. Instead, they're doing short-term targeting of the
existing high-end recreational market.


What do you actually mean by comfort bikes? Bents? Touring? Something
else?
  #133  
Old December 9th 10, 09:41 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Tºm Shermªn™ °_°[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,339
Default Insular roadie rubbish about seats/saddles

On 12/9/2010 1:37 PM, Duane Hébert wrote:
On 12/9/2010 2:19 PM, Doc O'Leary wrote:
In ,
Tºm Shermªn™ " wrote:

Well, I have been in exactly one (1) LBS in the US where they both have
fully equipped commuter bicycles for sale on the shop floor and would
not act with at least some disdain when inquired about them.


Again, and? I even noted that many bike shops in the US are poorly run,
but you can probably look at the culture they exist in to see why. I
mean, who do you think they *expect* to be coming in looking for a
comfort bike? Someone with a lot of cash to spend now and in the
future, or someone who is just looking to "try out" biking by buying the
lowest-margin thing they can find and then stick it in the back of the
garage after 1 month?

You can't run a business supplying comfort bikes if the demand just
isn't there. If the industry had half a clue they'd be taking more
long-term steps to shift the balance over by fitting cycling in with the
existing culture. Instead, they're doing short-term targeting of the
existing high-end recreational market.


What do you actually mean by comfort bikes? Bents? Touring? Something else?


The bikes that would be really comfortable to the newbie are
crank-forward (CF) uprights and recumbents. The CF upright is certainly
an easier sell.

--
Tºm Shermªn - 42.435731,-83.985007
I am a vehicular cyclist.
  #134  
Old December 9th 10, 10:15 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Lou Holtman[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 881
Default Insular roadie rubbish about seats/saddles

Op 9-12-2010 22:41, Tºm Shermªn™ °_° schreef:
On 12/9/2010 1:37 PM, Duane Hébert wrote:
On 12/9/2010 2:19 PM, Doc O'Leary wrote:
In ,
Tºm Shermªn™ " wrote:

Well, I have been in exactly one (1) LBS in the US where they both have
fully equipped commuter bicycles for sale on the shop floor and would
not act with at least some disdain when inquired about them.

Again, and? I even noted that many bike shops in the US are poorly run,
but you can probably look at the culture they exist in to see why. I
mean, who do you think they *expect* to be coming in looking for a
comfort bike? Someone with a lot of cash to spend now and in the
future, or someone who is just looking to "try out" biking by buying the
lowest-margin thing they can find and then stick it in the back of the
garage after 1 month?

You can't run a business supplying comfort bikes if the demand just
isn't there. If the industry had half a clue they'd be taking more
long-term steps to shift the balance over by fitting cycling in with the
existing culture. Instead, they're doing short-term targeting of the
existing high-end recreational market.


What do you actually mean by comfort bikes? Bents? Touring? Something
else?


The bikes that would be really comfortable to the newbie are
crank-forward (CF) uprights and recumbents. The CF upright is certainly
an easier sell.



Why is that? I find bikes with a slack seattube angle uncomfortable. I
had some trouble to find a commuter that did not have a slack seattube
angle like the so called comfort bikes here in the Netherlands.

Lou
  #135  
Old December 9th 10, 10:19 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Tºm Shermªn™ °_°[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,339
Default Insular roadie rubbish about seats/saddles

On 12/9/2010 4:15 PM, Lou Holtman wrote:
Op 9-12-2010 22:41, Tºm Shermªn™ °_° schreef:
On 12/9/2010 1:37 PM, Duane Hébert wrote:
On 12/9/2010 2:19 PM, Doc O'Leary wrote:
In ,
Tºm Shermªn™ " wrote:

Well, I have been in exactly one (1) LBS in the US where they both
have
fully equipped commuter bicycles for sale on the shop floor and would
not act with at least some disdain when inquired about them.

Again, and? I even noted that many bike shops in the US are poorly run,
but you can probably look at the culture they exist in to see why. I
mean, who do you think they *expect* to be coming in looking for a
comfort bike? Someone with a lot of cash to spend now and in the
future, or someone who is just looking to "try out" biking by buying
the
lowest-margin thing they can find and then stick it in the back of the
garage after 1 month?

You can't run a business supplying comfort bikes if the demand just
isn't there. If the industry had half a clue they'd be taking more
long-term steps to shift the balance over by fitting cycling in with
the
existing culture. Instead, they're doing short-term targeting of the
existing high-end recreational market.


What do you actually mean by comfort bikes? Bents? Touring? Something
else?


The bikes that would be really comfortable to the newbie are
crank-forward (CF) uprights and recumbents. The CF upright is certainly
an easier sell.



Why is that? I find bikes with a slack seattube angle uncomfortable. I
had some trouble to find a commuter that did not have a slack seattube
angle like the so called comfort bikes here in the Netherlands.

Lou


With a slack enough angle, a real seat [1] instead of a saddle with high
pressure points can be used. The slack angle also takes all the
pressure off the rider's hands.

[1] http://www.ransbikes.com/Zenetik09/Enlarge09.html

--
Tºm Shermªn - 42.435731,-83.985007
I am a vehicular cyclist.
  #136  
Old December 9th 10, 10:23 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
David Scheidt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,346
Default Insular roadie rubbish about seats/saddles

Tºm Shermªn™ °_° " wrote:
:On 12/9/2010 4:15 PM, Lou Holtman wrote:
: Op 9-12-2010 22:41, Tºm Shermªn™ °_° schreef:
: On 12/9/2010 1:37 PM, Duane Hébert wrote:
: On 12/9/2010 2:19 PM, Doc O'Leary wrote:
: In ,
: Tºm Shermªn™ " wrote:
:
: Well, I have been in exactly one (1) LBS in the US where they both
: have
: fully equipped commuter bicycles for sale on the shop floor and would
: not act with at least some disdain when inquired about them.
:
: Again, and? I even noted that many bike shops in the US are poorly run,
: but you can probably look at the culture they exist in to see why. I
: mean, who do you think they *expect* to be coming in looking for a
: comfort bike? Someone with a lot of cash to spend now and in the
: future, or someone who is just looking to "try out" biking by buying
: the
: lowest-margin thing they can find and then stick it in the back of the
: garage after 1 month?
:
: You can't run a business supplying comfort bikes if the demand just
: isn't there. If the industry had half a clue they'd be taking more
: long-term steps to shift the balance over by fitting cycling in with
: the
: existing culture. Instead, they're doing short-term targeting of the
: existing high-end recreational market.
:
:
: What do you actually mean by comfort bikes? Bents? Touring? Something
: else?
:
: The bikes that would be really comfortable to the newbie are
: crank-forward (CF) uprights and recumbents. The CF upright is certainly
: an easier sell.
:
:
:
: Why is that? I find bikes with a slack seattube angle uncomfortable. I
: had some trouble to find a commuter that did not have a slack seattube
: angle like the so called comfort bikes here in the Netherlands.
:
: Lou

:With a slack enough angle, a real seat with high
ressure points can be used. The slack angle also takes all the
ressure off the rider's hands.

fixed that for you.

--
sig 67
  #137  
Old December 9th 10, 11:27 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
James[_8_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,153
Default Insular roadie rubbish about seats/saddles

Tºm Shermªn™ °_° wrote:

With a slack enough angle, a real seat [1] instead of a saddle with high
pressure points can be used. The slack angle also takes all the
pressure off the rider's hands.

[1] http://www.ransbikes.com/Zenetik09/Enlarge09.html


Is that design strong enough for heavier folks? Looks to me like the
seat tube would bend pretty easy, or the seat post.

JS.
  #138  
Old December 10th 10, 02:05 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Tºm Shermªn™ °_°[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,339
Default Insular roadie rubbish about seats/saddles

On 12/9/2010 5:27 PM, James Steward wrote:
Tºm Shermªn™ °_° wrote:

With a slack enough angle, a real seat [1] instead of a saddle with
high pressure points can be used. The slack angle also takes all the
pressure off the rider's hands.

[1] http://www.ransbikes.com/Zenetik09/Enlarge09.html


Is that design strong enough for heavier folks? Looks to me like the
seat tube would bend pretty easy, or the seat post.

Rated for 275 pounds: http://www.ransbikes.com/zenetikspecs.htm

--
Tºm Shermªn - 42.435731,-83.985007
I am a vehicular cyclist.
  #139  
Old December 10th 10, 02:27 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Michael Press
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,202
Default Insular roadie rubbish about seats/saddles

In article ,
Lou Holtman wrote:

Op 5-12-2010 22:20, Tºm Shermªn™ °_° schreef:
On 12/5/2010 2:18 PM, Doc O'Leary wrote:
In ,
Tºm Shermªn? " wrote:

On 12/5/2010 12:06 AM, Michael Press wrote:
In ,
Tºm Shermªnⓢ " wrote:

How is the newer rider going to maintain hard pedaling until he/she
gets
into shape? What about times when hard pedaling may not be
appropriate?

Who said it was going to be easy?
Buy if Buick Lucerne and ditch
the bicycle if it hurts that much.

So Mr. Press is an elitist who does not want to expand the number of
cyclists?

I think some people are still arguing over petty differences in degrees.
The reality *is* that most people expect that using a vehicle means
going 20mph with no effort. That's not what bikes do, much less comfort
bikes! There is nothing at all elitist to point out that those people
have lost touch with reality. If you want to "expand the number of
cyclists", you're not going to do it by lying to them about what to
expect.

The degree of discomfort a road bike can inflict on a new/casual rider
is not petty, but severe enough to make most give up on cycling.


New and casual riders should not buy a road bike. Simple. If they do
they are stupid. If that makes them give up riding, they are not trying
hard enough to find a comfortable bike .


Or trying hard enough to learn something
many others are adept at and find worth doing.

If trikes/bents are so much more comfortable why are the roads not
flooded with them? If you really want one you can buy one. Why don't
people do that? You can blame only yourself.


Most people prefer to resemble Eddy Merckx;
rather than resembling a circus clown.

--
Michael Press
  #140  
Old December 10th 10, 02:38 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Michael Press
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,202
Default Insular roadie rubbish about seats/saddles

In article ,
James wrote:

Tºm Shermªn™ °_° wrote:

The degree of discomfort a road bike can inflict on a new/casual rider
is not petty, but severe enough to make most give up on cycling.


Many people I observe around here buy a budget MTB as their first bike,
expecting it to be comfortable and 'have enough gears' to ride over
hills they might encounter.

If they stay with cycling they soon start to wonder why guys on road
bikes go zooming past them, and several have asked me why. It doesn't
take long from there to get them on high pressure slicks, clipless
pedals, bar ends and lowered bars at least. The next step is to ditch
the heavy and unnecessary suspension forks that they were so excited
about when they first bought their MTB.

A road bike is not far away, and when they next ride Melbourne's 200km
'Around The Bay In a Day' an hour faster then the previous year, they're
happy.


Another victim to glamour.

--
Michael Press
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Unicon Xv Logo Design Competition Ducttape Unicycling 5 May 17th 08 08:21 AM
Unicon Xv Logo Design Competition Jkohse Unicycling 0 May 15th 08 11:11 PM
Unicon Xv Logo Design Competition Jkohse Unicycling 0 May 15th 08 11:09 PM
International Bicycle Design Competition Matt[_5_] UK 2 April 27th 08 11:46 AM
Unicycle Design/Creation competition. :D Hazmat Unicycling 96 July 11th 07 04:12 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.