#1
|
|||
|
|||
Bitter Irony...
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:29:55 -0800, "Bill Sornson"
wrote: Perfect. You can't (or won't) dispute or even address the /content/ (namely, that some say an ice age is upon us); instead you attack the person /reporting/ (accurately) what some are saying. In technical subjects, on which there is broad consensus among people skilled and trained in that field of knowledge, when someone says something that contradicts that consensus so broadly, the onus is on them to demonstrate that they are right. And their lack of bona fides is a valid issue. It's particularly the case when what they say or write is so obviously flawed. |
Ads |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bitter Irony... | Bill Sornson[_2_] | Techniques | 323 | January 20th 09 04:18 AM |
Upright versus laid back (was Bitter Irony...) | Tom Sherman[_2_] | Recumbent Biking | 8 | November 19th 08 12:03 AM |
Bitter irony on 774AM | flyingdutch | Australia | 13 | September 1st 05 09:31 AM |