![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chris Foster" wrote in message 05.47... "Edward Dolan" wrote in : [...] ALL newsgroups without any exceptions whatsoever are by and for idiots. Therefore, it does not matter what gets posted on any of them since only idiots like Curtiss are present. If you want intelligence, then go to a moderated forum where an editor will get rid of the idiots and their idiotic messages. I repeat, there is no one on these newsgroups (unmoderated) except assholes and jerks! What else do you need to know? You are, of course, including yourself in that group of assholes and jerks. Yes, I am, but only for the purposes of Usenet. Mainly I am slumming on these newsgroups to see how the other half lives and thinks. My every expectation has been fulfilled in spades. Like I said, nothing but assholes and jerks! Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chris Foster" wrote in message 05.47... "Edward Dolan" wrote in news:krWdnV3LP5fMgj3ZnZ2dnUVZ_uudnZ2d@prairiewave. com: "JimmyMac" wrote in message ups.com... Edward Dolan wrote: "JimmyMac" wrote in message ps.com... Edward Dolan wrote: It was never my intention to dominate a newsgroup and I am sure it was not Mike Vandeman's intention either, but yet I do dominate ARBR and Vandeman does dominate RBS. We both stay on our own threads and do not step on other threads, but it seems that it doesn't matter. Others simply go away and before you know it all there is on these groups is Dolan and Vandeman. I think both of us in our separate ways serve as a catalyst for a few others who take us on. Our messages become increasingly contentious and finally we are preventing others from coming onto the group. That is certainly not my intention and I know it is not Vandeman's intention either. But what to do about it? Tis a simple problem with a simpl solution ... L E A V E !!!!! Well, that is ONE possible solution, but then what would I have to do. Besides, I add interest to what would otherwise be a very dull group. It would not be fair to those who come to ARBR and RBS expecting some entertainment. Thanks for validating what I said of you in the past ... Ed Dolan has little more than ARBR from which to derive meaning in his life. The Usenet newsgroup (particularly ARBR) has assumed an exaggerated prominence in his hierarchical order of relevance. The Usenet newsgroup (particularly ARBR) has emerged as the source from which he garners his sense of accomplishment and self-esteem. Regardless of his opinion of the readership, without the lifeblood of the Usenet newsgroup audience to sustain him, Ed Dolan has nothing and is nothing. What a pathetic shallow existence. Pity the cantankerous, misguided, quintessential fool. It must really suck to be head swollen ... HEAD Dolan. Jim McNamara Here is Jim yet once more expressing all those doubts about himself. It is really too bad he cannot go forth into the world like Ed Dolan the Great, oblivious to all but himself. I stopped checking my credentials with others by the time I was out of my teens, but apparently some guys just never get out of their teens. There is nothing more to say here, Jim said it all with blazing accuracy Jim is into nothing but gobbledygook. He has always been that way. But it is good to see one turkey (Chris) recognize another turkey (Jim). Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Edward Dolan" wrote in message ... Well, that is ONE possible solution, but then what would I have to do. Besides, I add interest to what would otherwise be a very dull group. It would not be fair to those who come to ARBR and RBS expecting some entertainment. Perhaps discussions of gearing, frame types, cycling routes and such is EXACTLY what people post for. There a million sites for "entertainment". Why read about the non-sexual proclamations of a self-absorbed individual when I want to know what gearing I should have when visiting the Blue Ridge Parkway? Nope, I cannot believe there are any humans who are so dead that they would limit themselves to what you propose. Either be a complete human being or be gone! I know better than you what is good for you! Who is being limited? With a million websites (and other NGs) dedicated to entertainment, who needs you to post junk? We're smart enough to find entertainment on our own. Here is a place for information we can use and share to enhance our cycling experience. Reading the ramblings of a psychiatric throwaway does'nt [doesn't] cut it. ALL newsgroups without any exceptions whatsoever are by and for idiots. Therefore, it does not matter what gets posted on any of them since only idiots like Curtiss are present. If you want intelligence, then go to a moderated forum where an editor will get rid of the idiots and their idiotic messages. Hello Dolan, the great idiot I repeat, there is no one on these newsgroups (unmoderated) except assholes and jerks! What else do you need to know? Hello Dolan, the great asshole and jerk. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "S Curtiss" wrote in message news:32_ng.25195$FR1.14697@dukeread05... "Edward Dolan" wrote in message ... Well, that is ONE possible solution, but then what would I have to do. Besides, I add interest to what would otherwise be a very dull group. It would not be fair to those who come to ARBR and RBS expecting some entertainment. Perhaps discussions of gearing, frame types, cycling routes and such is EXACTLY what people post for. There a million sites for "entertainment". Why read about the non-sexual proclamations of a self-absorbed individual when I want to know what gearing I should have when visiting the Blue Ridge Parkway? Nope, I cannot believe there are any humans who are so dead that they would limit themselves to what you propose. Either be a complete human being or be gone! I know better than you what is good for you! Who is being limited? With a million websites (and other NGs) dedicated to entertainment, who needs you to post junk? We're smart enough to find entertainment on our own. Here is a place for information we can use and share to enhance our cycling experience. Reading the ramblings of a psychiatric throwaway does'nt [doesn't] cut it. ALL newsgroups without any exceptions whatsoever are by and for idiots. Therefore, it does not matter what gets posted on any of them since only idiots like Curtiss are present. If you want intelligence, then go to a moderated forum where an editor will get rid of the idiots and their idiotic messages. Hello Dolan, the great idiot Thus proving my point! I repeat, there is no one on these newsgroups (unmoderated) except assholes and jerks! What else do you need to know? Hello Dolan, the great asshole and jerk. Thus proving my point! Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Edward Dolan" wrote in message news:L8adnfdKsbG34T3ZnZ2dnUVZ_o2dnZ2d@prairiewave. com... "S Curtiss" wrote in message news:32_ng.25195$FR1.14697@dukeread05... "Edward Dolan" wrote in message ... Well, that is ONE possible solution, but then what would I have to do. Besides, I add interest to what would otherwise be a very dull group. It would not be fair to those who come to ARBR and RBS expecting some entertainment. Perhaps discussions of gearing, frame types, cycling routes and such is EXACTLY what people post for. There a million sites for "entertainment". Why read about the non-sexual proclamations of a self-absorbed individual when I want to know what gearing I should have when visiting the Blue Ridge Parkway? Nope, I cannot believe there are any humans who are so dead that they would limit themselves to what you propose. Either be a complete human being or be gone! I know better than you what is good for you! Who is being limited? With a million websites (and other NGs) dedicated to entertainment, who needs you to post junk? We're smart enough to find entertainment on our own. Here is a place for information we can use and share to enhance our cycling experience. Reading the ramblings of a psychiatric throwaway does'nt [doesn't] cut it. ALL newsgroups without any exceptions whatsoever are by and for idiots. Therefore, it does not matter what gets posted on any of them since only idiots like Curtiss are present. If you want intelligence, then go to a moderated forum where an editor will get rid of the idiots and their idiotic messages. Hello Dolan, the great idiot Thus proving my point! To who...? I repeat, there is no one on these newsgroups (unmoderated) except assholes and jerks! What else do you need to know? Hello Dolan, the great asshole and jerk. Thus proving my point! You didn't have to work so hard to prove you are an idiot, asshole and jerk. We've known that for quite some time. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Edward Dolan wrote: "JimmyMac" wrote in message ups.com... Edward Dolan wrote: "JimmyMac" wrote in message ps.com... Edward Dolan wrote: It was never my intention to dominate a newsgroup and I am sure it was not Mike Vandeman's intention either, but yet I do dominate ARBR and Vandeman does dominate RBS. We both stay on our own threads and do not step on other threads, but it seems that it doesn't matter. Others simply go away and before you know it all there is on these groups is Dolan and Vandeman. I think both of us in our separate ways serve as a catalyst for a few others who take us on. Our messages become increasingly contentious and finally we are preventing others from coming onto the group. That is certainly not my intention and I know it is not Vandeman's intention either. But what to do about it? Tis a simple problem with a simpl solution ... L E A V E !!!!! Well, that is ONE possible solution, but then what would I have to do. Besides, I add interest to what would otherwise be a very dull group. It would not be fair to those who come to ARBR and RBS expecting some entertainment. Thanks for validating what I said of you in the past ... Ed Dolan has little more than ARBR from which to derive meaning in his life. The Usenet newsgroup (particularly ARBR) has assumed an exaggerated prominence in his hierarchical order of relevance. The Usenet newsgroup (particularly ARBR) has emerged as the source from which he garners his sense of accomplishment and self-esteem. Regardless of his opinion of the readership, without the lifeblood of the Usenet newsgroup audience to sustain him, Ed Dolan has nothing and is nothing. What a pathetic shallow existence. Pity the cantankerous, misguided, quintessential fool. It must really suck to be head swollen ... HEAD Dolan. Jim McNamara Here is Jim yet once more expressing all those doubts about himself. It is really too bad he cannot go forth into the world like Ed Dolan the Great, oblivious to all but himself. I stopped checking my credentials with others by the time I was out of my teens, but apparently some guys just never get out of their teens. Regards, Ed ... yes, I'm addressing you personally, whether you like it or not .... your response can be considered as nothng less that an admission that your reading comprehesnion skills are second rate, and you were once a librarian??? How sadl!!! - Jim McNamara Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Edward Dolan wrote: "Chris Foster" wrote in message 05.47... [...] Nice try Conan, I have the e-mail you initially sent me. You started the e-mail exchange. I just got you so ****ed that you just had to do it, didnt you. You can deny it, but I got the proof. And here it is: See where is states: "Chris Foster" wrote in message 05.47... That means I wrote my message in the news server. All the rest of the header is a e-mail header. To sum it up. You stated the e-mail exchange, now you are tring to deny it, Vandy, would of course, type the word liar in all caps, but that is simply too childish for me. Nope, I got your message in my email box and I did not see in on the newsgroup. I NEVER send anyone an email message that is connected to the newsgroups unless I get an email from them first. My standard policy is to discourage all such communication as I like to keep Usenet separate from my real life. Elementary, my dear Watson! [...] C O R R E C T I O N ..... Usenet is your life and everyone hear knows that. - Jim McNamara Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Edward Dolan wrote: "Chris Foster" wrote in message 05.47... "Edward Dolan" wrote in news:krWdnV3LP5fMgj3ZnZ2dnUVZ_uudnZ2d@prairiewave. com: "JimmyMac" wrote in message ups.com... Edward Dolan wrote: "JimmyMac" wrote in message ps.com... Edward Dolan wrote: It was never my intention to dominate a newsgroup and I am sure it was not Mike Vandeman's intention either, but yet I do dominate ARBR and Vandeman does dominate RBS. We both stay on our own threads and do not step on other threads, but it seems that it doesn't matter. Others simply go away and before you know it all there is on these groups is Dolan and Vandeman. I think both of us in our separate ways serve as a catalyst for a few others who take us on. Our messages become increasingly contentious and finally we are preventing others from coming onto the group. That is certainly not my intention and I know it is not Vandeman's intention either. But what to do about it? Tis a simple problem with a simple solution ... L E A V E !!!!! Well, that is ONE possible solution, but then what would I have to do. Besides, I add interest to what would otherwise be a very dull group. It would not be fair to those who come to ARBR and RBS expecting some entertainment. Thanks for validating what I said of you in the past ... Ed Dolan has little more than ARBR from which to derive meaning in his life. The Usenet newsgroup (particularly ARBR) has assumed an exaggerated prominence in his hierarchical order of relevance. The Usenet newsgroup (particularly ARBR) has emerged as the source from which he garners his sense of accomplishment and self-esteem. Regardless of his opinion of the readership, without the lifeblood of the Usenet newsgroup audience to sustain him, Ed Dolan has nothing and is nothing. What a pathetic shallow existence. Pity the cantankerous, misguided, quintessential fool. It must really suck to be head swollen ... HEAD Dolan. Jim McNamara Here is Jim yet once more expressing all those doubts about himself. It is really too bad he cannot go forth into the world like Ed Dolan the Great, oblivious to all but himself. I stopped checking my credentials with others by the time I was out of my teens, but apparently some guys just never get out of their teens. There is nothing more to say here, Jim said it all with blazing accuracy Jim is into nothing but gobbledygook. He has always been that way. But it is good to see one turkey (Chris) recognize another turkey (Jim). What a lame comeback ... brain-dead. Is that the best you can do??? Ed Dolan is intoxicated by his own cerebral flatulence. His screeds (read Gospels according to St. Edward) are legendary. A pretentious purveyor of disinformation, Ed employs cyclical, incoherent rhetoric to advocate his own personal agenda. He subscribes to the mistaken notion that the readership savors his prosaic prefunctory prattle whereas in reality the only person who values what the man says is the man saying it. Ed is a pedant who is enraptured by his own vacuous gibberish. Not bad gobbledygook coming from a turkey, huh Ed??? Chris Foster, GaryG, Bill Baka and cc are just a few of the many who have come to know you for what and who you are. Your reputaton as ARBR's quintessential TROLL will forever be your legacy. You can take leave of us now. Can't do it can you? After all, Usenet is your life. How sick is that??? Jim McNamara Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]() JimmyMac wrote: Edward Dolan wrote: "Chris Foster" wrote in message 05.47... "Edward Dolan" wrote in news:krWdnV3LP5fMgj3ZnZ2dnUVZ_uudnZ2d@prairiewave. com: "JimmyMac" wrote in message ups.com... Edward Dolan wrote: "JimmyMac" wrote in message ps.com... Edward Dolan wrote: It was never my intention to dominate a newsgroup and I am sure it was not Mike Vandeman's intention either, but yet I do dominate ARBR and Vandeman does dominate RBS. We both stay on our own threads and do not step on other threads, but it seems that it doesn't matter. Others simply go away and before you know it all there is on these groups is Dolan and Vandeman. I think both of us in our separate ways serve as a catalyst for a few others who take us on. Our messages become increasingly contentious and finally we are preventing others from coming onto the group. That is certainly not my intention and I know it is not Vandeman's intention either. But what to do about it? Tis a simple problem with a simple solution ... L E A V E !!!!! Well, that is ONE possible solution, but then what would I have to do. Besides, I add interest to what would otherwise be a very dull group. It would not be fair to those who come to ARBR and RBS expecting some entertainment. Thanks for validating what I said of you in the past ... Ed Dolan has little more than ARBR from which to derive meaning in his life. The Usenet newsgroup (particularly ARBR) has assumed an exaggerated prominence in his hierarchical order of relevance. The Usenet newsgroup (particularly ARBR) has emerged as the source from which he garners his sense of accomplishment and self-esteem. Regardless of his opinion of the readership, without the lifeblood of the Usenet newsgroup audience to sustain him, Ed Dolan has nothing and is nothing. What a pathetic shallow existence. Pity the cantankerous, misguided, quintessential fool. It must really suck to be head swollen ... HEAD Dolan. Jim McNamara Here is Jim yet once more expressing all those doubts about himself. It is really too bad he cannot go forth into the world like Ed Dolan the Great, oblivious to all but himself. I stopped checking my credentials with others by the time I was out of my teens, but apparently some guys just never get out of their teens. There is nothing more to say here, Jim said it all with blazing accuracy Jim is into nothing but gobbledygook. He has always been that way. But it is good to see one turkey (Chris) recognize another turkey (Jim). What a lame comeback ... brain-dead. Is that the best you can do??? Ed Dolan is intoxicated by his own cerebral flatulence. His screeds (read Gospels according to St. Edward) are legendary. A pretentious purveyor of disinformation, Ed employs cyclical, incoherent rhetoric to advocate his own personal agenda. He subscribes to the mistaken notion that the readership savors his prosaic prefunctory prattle whereas in reality the only person who values what the man says is the man saying it. Ed is a pedant who is enraptured by his own vacuous gibberish. Not bad gobbledygook coming from a turkey, huh Ed??? Chris Foster, GaryG, Bill Baka and cc are just a few of the many who have come to know you for what and who you are. Your reputaton as ARBR's quintessential TROLL will forever be your legacy. You can take leave of us now. Can't do it can you? After all, Usenet is your life. How sick is that??? Oops ... forgot to include S Curtiss. Didn't mean to slight anyone ;^) - Jim Jim McNamara Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "JimmyMac" wrote in message ups.com... Edward Dolan wrote: [...] "Chris Foster" wrote in message 05.47... [...] To sum it up. You stated the e-mail exchange, now you are tring to deny it, Vandy, would of course, type the word liar in all caps, but that is simply too childish for me. Nope, I got your message in my email box and I did not see it on the newsgroup. I NEVER send anyone an email message that is connected to the newsgroups unless I get an email from them first. My standard policy is to discourage all such communication as I like to keep Usenet separate from my real life. Elementary, my dear Watson! [...] C O R R E C T I O N ..... Usenet is your life and everyone hear [here] knows that. - Jim McNamara Usenet is strictly for idiots, assholes and jerks - positively no exceptions! When I am on Usenet I try to be the biggest idiot, asshole and jerk of them all. I set the standard for one and all. I believe I can state with absolute assurance that I am the Greatest Idiot, the Greatest Asshole and the Greatest Jerk that Usenet has ever known in its' long and dishonored history. For Christ's sakes, I prove it every time I post. Can't any of you poor *******s read? Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups | Edward Dolan | Social Issues | 75 | July 8th 06 04:24 AM |
Hey Dolan I hope Vandeman doesn't stop suddenly | Edward Dolan | Social Issues | 0 | June 10th 06 07:57 AM |
Real Names vs. User Names | Ed Pirrero | General | 3 | May 23rd 06 09:00 AM |
Real Names vs. User Names | Edward Dolan | Social Issues | 0 | May 23rd 06 09:00 AM |
An experiment to prove the helmet law proponants RIGHT (or wrong) | David | Recumbent Biking | 65 | December 21st 04 06:42 AM |