![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Edward Dolan" wrote in message news ![]() "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact" hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction. Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently, you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were you...? In charge of the picture books? Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond to his posts. Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person from reading or responding to any other post. Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst. You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at Jim McNamara for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a stalker too. Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think I am Greater than I really am. The Great Ed Dolan does not ever stalk anyone. I have my own agenda and cannot even imagine anyone else in the universe to be even remotely as interesting as myself. pathetic |
Ads |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "S Curtiss" wrote in message news ![]() "Edward Dolan" wrote in message news ![]() "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact" hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction. Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently, you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were you...? In charge of the picture books? Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond to his posts. Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person from reading or responding to any other post. Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst. Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it is all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way. Something is dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or two persons. You desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny. You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at Jim McNamara for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a stalker too. Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think I am Greater than I really am. I am the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are - a stalker and a leech! No one else has the intelligence to do this. I should really be charging you something for my services. [...] Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Edward Dolan wrote: "JimmyMac" wrote in message ups.com... Edward Dolan wrote: [...] "Chris Foster" wrote in message 05.47... [...] To sum it up. You stated the e-mail exchange, now you are tring to deny it, Vandy, would of course, type the word liar in all caps, but that is simply too childish for me. Nope, I got your message in my email box and I did not see it on the newsgroup. I NEVER send anyone an email message that is connected to the newsgroups unless I get an email from them first. My standard policy is to discourage all such communication as I like to keep Usenet separate from my real life. Elementary, my dear Watson! [...] C O R R E C T I O N ..... Usenet is your life and everyone hear [here] knows that. - Jim McNamara Usenet is strictly for idiots, assholes and jerks - positively no exceptions! When I am on Usenet I try to be the biggest idiot, asshole and jerk of them all. I set the standard for one and all. I believe I can state with absolute assurance that I am the Greatest Idiot, the Greatest Asshole and the Greatest Jerk that Usenet has ever known in its' long and dishonored history. For Christ's sakes, I prove it every time I post. Can't any of you poor *******s read? I dare say that all who read what you have had to say here will mosat assuredly agree that you have painted a remarkably true to life self-portrait. - Jim McNamara Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Edward Dolan wrote: "JimmyMac" wrote in message ups.com... Edward Dolan wrote: [...] Well, that is ONE possible solution, but then what would I have to do. Besides, I add interest to what would otherwise be a very dull group. It would not be fair to those who come to ARBR and RBS expecting some entertainment. Thanks for validating what I said of you in the past ... Ed Dolan has little more than ARBR from which to derive meaning in his life. The Usenet newsgroup (particularly ARBR) has assumed an exaggerated prominence in his hierarchical order of relevance. The Usenet newsgroup (particularly ARBR) has emerged as the source from which he garners his sense of accomplishment and self-esteem. Regardless of his opinion of the readership, without the lifeblood of the Usenet newsgroup audience to sustain him, Ed Dolan has nothing and is nothing. What a pathetic shallow existence. Pity the cantankerous, misguided, quintessential fool. It must really suck to be head swollen ... HEAD Dolan. Jim McNamara Here is Jim yet once more expressing all those doubts about himself. It is really too bad he cannot go forth into the world like Ed Dolan the Great, oblivious to all but himself. I stopped checking my credentials with others by the time I was out of my teens, but apparently some guys just never get out of their teens. Ed ... yes, I'm addressing you personally, whether you like it or not ... your response can be considered as nothng less that an admission that your reading comprehesnion skills are second rate, and you were once a librarian??? How sadl!!! - Jim McNamara You may be addressing me, but I am addressing a universe of unknown readers. You merely serve as a vehicle for what I want so say. Keep those messages coming to me personally and I will keep my messages going to a universe of readers. A universe of deaf ears does not an audience make - Jim McNamara. Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Edward Dolan wrote: "S Curtiss" wrote in message news ![]() "Edward Dolan" wrote in message news ![]() "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact" hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction. Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently, you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were you...? In charge of the picture books? Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond to his posts. Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person from reading or responding to any other post. Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst. Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it is all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way. Something is dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or two persons. You desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny. Right ... You are cacophony of bu**** all up an down the scale. You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at Jim McNamara for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a stalker too. Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think I am Greater than I really am. I am the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are - a stalker and a leech! No one else has the intelligence to do this. I should really be charging you something for my services. Say Steve ... from one stalkeg to another ;^) ... Despit what DOlan claims, this doens't take any degree of intelligcnce and Ed isn't the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are. You are an Ed Dolan adversary and an Ed Dolan irritant and you are doing a great job. Keep up the good work. By the way, there is no charge for my surfaces. I'll undercut Dolan's price any day. - Jim McNamara [...] Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Edward Dolan wrote: "S Curtiss" wrote in message news ![]() "Edward Dolan" wrote in message news ![]() "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact" hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction. Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently, you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were you...? In charge of the picture books? Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond to his posts. Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person from reading or responding to any other post. Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst. Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it is all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way. Something is dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or two persons. You desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny. Right ... You are cacophony of bu**** all up an down the scale. You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at Jim McNamara for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a stalker too. Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think I am Greater than I really am. I am the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are - a stalker and a leech! No one else has the intelligence to do this. I should really be charging you something for my services. Say Steve ... from one stalkeg to another ;^) ... Despit what DOlan claims, this doens't take any degree of intelligcnce and Ed isn't the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are. You are an Ed Dolan adversary and an Ed Dolan irritant and you are doing a great job. Keep up the good work. By the way, there is no charge for my surfaces. I'll undercut Dolan's price any day. - Jim McNamara [...] Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "JimmyMac" wrote in message ups.com... Edward Dolan wrote: "S Curtiss" wrote in message news ![]() "Edward Dolan" wrote in message news ![]() "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact" hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction. Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently, you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were you...? In charge of the picture books? Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond to his posts. Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person from reading or responding to any other post. Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst. Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it is all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way. Something is dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or two persons. You desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny. Right ... You are cacophony of bu**** all up an down the scale. You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at Jim McNamara for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a stalker too. Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think I am Greater than I really am. I am the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are - a stalker and a leech! No one else has the intelligence to do this. I should really be charging you something for my services. Say Steve ... from one stalkeg to another ;^) ... Despit what DOlan claims, this doens't take any degree of intelligcnce and Ed isn't the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are. You are an Ed Dolan adversary and an Ed Dolan irritant and you are doing a great job. Keep up the good work. By the way, there is no charge for my surfaces. I'll undercut Dolan's price any day. - Jim McNamara Actually I require some intellectuality and that is the one thing that is sorely lacking from all my current adversaries. I really miss Tom Sherman. He at least tried to display some intellect from time to time. Poor Jimbo thinks verbiage is a substitute for thought. And so it goes - no one worthy of me. It is apparently my destiny to go through life surrounded by idiots, jerks and assholes. Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "JimmyMac" wrote in message oups.com... Edward Dolan wrote: "S Curtiss" wrote in message news ![]() "Edward Dolan" wrote in message ... "S Curtiss" wrote in message news:Aydog.25977$FR1.17618@dukeread05... "Edward Dolan" wrote in message news:L8adnfdKsbG34T3ZnZ2dnUVZ_o2dnZ2d@prairiewave. com... [...] ALL newsgroups without any exceptions whatsoever are by and for idiots. Therefore, it does not matter what gets posted on any of them since only idiots like Curtiss are present. If you want intelligence, then go to a moderated forum where an editor will get rid of the idiots and their idiotic messages. Hello Dolan, the great idiot Thus proving my point! To who...? I repeat, there is no one on these newsgroups (unmoderated) except assholes and jerks! What else do you need to know? Hello Dolan, the great asshole and jerk. Thus proving my point! You didn't have to work so hard to prove you are an idiot, asshole and jerk. We've known that for quite some time. The only thing worse than being an idiot, an asshole and a jerk is being Curtiss. He is nothing but a pathetic stalker of Vandeman. Worse yet, he does nothing but regurgitate boilerplate nonsense about how mountain biking does not impact hikers. He does both of these things because he is evil through and through. He would like to be a Great Saint like Saint Edward the Great, but that option is forever foreclosed to him because he is a man of the groin preoccupied with ****, **** and sex and not a man of the holy spirit like Saint Edward the Great. "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact" hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction. Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently, you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were you...? In charge of the picture books? Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond to his posts. You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at Jim McNamara for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a stalker too. The Great Ed Dolan does not ever stalk anyone. I have my own agenda and cannot even imagine anyone else in the universe to be even remotely as interesting as myself. Not even Sherman or Vandeman??? Jim, unlike you, I do not confuse cyperspace with real life. Sherman and Vandeman are only what I read on my computer screen. Unless and until I meet them in person, that is all they can ever be.The same goes for you too of course. I will admit I think I was stalking Tom Sherman at one time briefly, but I grew disgusted with myself for doing that and I decided I would only take him on when he got outrageously stupid. I always left him alone when he was posting on topic and I would only take him on when he got political. The last year or so Tom and I did not have much to say to one another because he steered away from political topics almost entirely. He knew far more about recumbents than I did and I respected him for that. Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Edward Dolan" wrote in
news:FK6dnRQiUpQEYD_ZnZ2dnUVZ_umdnZ2d@prairiewave. com: "Chris Foster" wrote in message 05.47... Edward Dolan wrote: Jim is into nothing but gobbledygook. He has always been that way. But it is good to see one turkey (Chris) recognize another turkey (Jim). What a lame comeback ... brain-dead. Is that the best you can do??? Ed Dolan is intoxicated by his own cerebral flatulence. His screeds (read Gospels according to St. Edward) are legendary. A pretentious purveyor of disinformation, Ed employs cyclical, incoherent rhetoric to advocate his own personal agenda. He subscribes to the mistaken notion that the readership savors his prosaic prefunctory prattle whereas in reality the only person who values what the man says is the man saying it. Ed is a pedant who is enraptured by his own vacuous gibberish. Not bad gobbledygook coming from a turkey, huh Ed??? Chris Foster, GaryG, Bill Baka and cc are just a few of the many who have come to know you for what and who you are. Your reputaton as ARBR's quintessential TROLL will forever be your legacy. You can take leave of us now. Can't do it can you? After all, Usenet is your life. How sick is that??? Jim McNamara Well said !! All the world hates a piling on kind of message. I cannot believe you were ever a Marine. Your present character says you have never been anything but a scoundrel. Are all Marines bullies like you? Pathetic, simply pathetic. Your feeble attempt at character assassination is duly noted -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A troll sets up camp in a newsgroup where he's got nothing to offer and
stirs up crap. Then he responds to any answers to create interminably long threads filled with interminably long messages since he never snips. These strings of nonsense help boost his sense of power and consequently his shriveled sense of self esteem. Typical of cubicle dwellers who've been shunted off to a deadend to await retirement. The only order of perpetual sorrow is populated by those exposed to his drivel. Oh well, it's an open usenet. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups | Edward Dolan | Social Issues | 75 | July 8th 06 04:24 AM |
Hey Dolan I hope Vandeman doesn't stop suddenly | Edward Dolan | Social Issues | 0 | June 10th 06 07:57 AM |
Real Names vs. User Names | Ed Pirrero | General | 3 | May 23rd 06 09:00 AM |
Real Names vs. User Names | Edward Dolan | Social Issues | 0 | May 23rd 06 09:00 AM |
An experiment to prove the helmet law proponants RIGHT (or wrong) | David | Recumbent Biking | 65 | December 21st 04 06:42 AM |