|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Thoughts on braking
3) If trail riders don't use their front brakes much--as my friend,
who was a sometime MTBer, seems to allege--why do I see so many front-wheel disk brakes? If you think of your weight distribution on the bike, the rear wheel can lock and you can carry on slowing down, whilst if the front wheel locks you are over the bars. As a result the front brake is far more effective a stopping mechanism provided you don't lock it up. Obviously using both brakes at once is going to stop you faster than using just one, though I suspect that in average MTB riding use, you use mostly the front brake when braking hard. 70% sounds realistic. What is often the case on a MTB is that you use the rear brake for tactical manoevres - for example to control your line of attack in a sharp corner. Try doing that with the front brake and you will find that it slides underneath you and you stack. My suspicion is that either your friend hasn't ridden without a front brake, or he doesn't ride very hard. Regards, John |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Thoughts on braking
"John Appleby" wrote in message
... My suspicion is that either your friend hasn't ridden without a front brake, or he doesn't ride very hard. I don't ride all that hard and I still can't imagine never using the front brake. I have tested stopping with just one brake or the other and the front brake always seems to do a better job. It is a lot easier to lock up the back brake on most bikes I have owned. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Thoughts on braking
John Appleby wrote:
As a result the front brake is far more effective a stopping mechanism provided you don't lock it up. Obviously using both brakes at once is going to stop you faster than using just one, That may be obvious to you but it is still not true. Read Sheldon's page on the subject! -- David Damerell flcl? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Thoughts on braking
That may be obvious to you but it is still not true. Read Sheldon's page
on the subject! -- David Damerell flcl? There are a lot of things that Sheldon knows a lot more about than I do. There are also topics on which I strongly disagree with him. This is one. I would really like to be there when someone using Sheldon's braking article as gospel really needs to stop NOW! I don't wish the results on anyone. Why wouldn't you want to use all the available braking in an emergency situation? It may not do a bunch, but the rear brake does help slow you down. Mike |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Thoughts on braking
"Mike S." mikeshaw2@coxDOTnet wrote in message
news:HCvXa.62346$zy.3531@fed1read06... I would really like to be there when someone using Sheldon's braking article as gospel really needs to stop NOW! I don't wish the results on anyone. Why wouldn't you want to use all the available braking in an emergency situation? It may not do a bunch, but the rear brake does help slow you down. Unless you're in a reduced traction situation, the front brake provides all the "available braking". Under maximum braking, the rear wheel completely unloads making it useless. Before that point, it is prone to skid when it locks. A skidding wheel will go sideways just as happily as forward. Two-brake panic stops are a great way to get your rear wheel to come around. If riding sideways is what you're after, it's a good technique. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Thoughts on braking
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 09:13:39 -0700, Mike S. mikeshaw2@coxDOTnet wrote:
Why wouldn't you want to use all the available braking in an emergency situation? It may not do a bunch, but the rear brake does help slow you down. It depends on which emergency situation. In many pavement-surfaced emergency situations, a properly adjusted front brake will provide enough braking to keep all your weight off the rear wheel; in that situation, the rear brake will not change anything, unless you've modulated your braking so precisely that the rear wheel has a small amount of lateral traction to keep you from sliding out sideways. That said, I know that when I was test-riding my road bike downhill in the city at about 30 mph and a car pulled out from a sidestreet, I didn't blow time thinking and deciding which brake to use how much; I just squeezed the hell out of those levers, which resulted in the front slowing me and the rear skidding (with no effect, although it could have had a bad effect). That was scary, exhilirating, exciting, and quite fun, and I hope it never happens again. Mike -- Rick Onanian |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Thoughts on braking
Mike S. wrote:
Why wouldn't you want to use all the available braking in an emergency situation? It may not do a bunch, but the rear brake does help slow you down. The rear brake can also make you crash when it's locked up. This causes "fishtailing", as the rear wheel tries to swap places with the front wheel. A locked rear wheel make an inherently unstable ride. -- terry morse Palo Alto, CA http://www.terrymorse.com/bike/ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Thoughts on braking
"Terry Morse" wrote in message ... Mike S. wrote: Why wouldn't you want to use all the available braking in an emergency situation? It may not do a bunch, but the rear brake does help slow you down. The rear brake can also make you crash when it's locked up. This causes "fishtailing", as the rear wheel tries to swap places with the front wheel. A locked rear wheel make an inherently unstable ride. -- terry morse Palo Alto, CA http://www.terrymorse.com/bike/ I dunno about y'all, but in the 15 years of riding, I've never had a serious case of the bike swapping ends when I'm emergency braking. Last time, I was off the back of the saddle, arms extended, and grabbing hold of both brakes as hard as I could. When I grab just the rear, it can happen. Used to when I was a kid anyway... Mike |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Thoughts on braking
Is it possible that the difference between bikes and motorcycles, as far
as front/rear braking is concerned, is that a much larger percentage of the weight on a bicycle (mainly the weight of the rider) is on the front wheels? And so there would be a difference between a road bicycle, say, where there is relatively little of the rider's weight on the seat, and a hybrid or "comfort" bike, where most of the rider's weight is on the seat? Carl On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Terry Morse wrote: Mike S. wrote: Why wouldn't you want to use all the available braking in an emergency situation? It may not do a bunch, but the rear brake does help slow you down. The rear brake can also make you crash when it's locked up. This causes "fishtailing", as the rear wheel tries to swap places with the front wheel. A locked rear wheel make an inherently unstable ride. -- terry morse Palo Alto, CA http://www.terrymorse.com/bike/ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Thoughts on braking
I can't believe y'all are even thinking about braking. Doesn't eveyone know
about this by now? My only thoughts (currently) on braking involve my failure to see the smooth, steel manhole cover, and what the front brake means in such situations, particularly in regards to healing. -- Robin Hubert |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Any thoughts on bike shipping w/ airlines? | Doug Taylor | Mountain Biking | 5 | September 24th 03 11:03 PM |
Thoughts on braking | John Appleby | General | 76 | August 11th 03 10:30 AM |
It's amazing how many thoughts can go through your head in 1/4 of a second... | djarvinen | Mountain Biking | 14 | August 5th 03 08:37 PM |
brake pads are wider than braking surface | Michael | Techniques | 2 | July 10th 03 05:45 PM |