|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Half Step and Granny - which front derailleur?
On May 19, 10:20*am, "Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote:
"Jenny Brien" wrote in message newsp.ubd86ndlaozhuq@sna123456789... On Sun, 18 May 2008 21:10:11 +0100, Tom Kunich com "cyclintom"@yahoo. wrote: wrote in message .... Sheldon (R.I.P.) might have suggested an ordinary road front derailleur for double chainrings. Except that the man has a triple Ben. And it is a funny one as well with a 45-41 and a granny of some size. This would suggest using a clamp-on Shimano Deore derailer. And if I were him I'd use a 24 tooth granny. Better to have a gear low enough to lift a full load up Mt. Vesuvius than not. Any derailleur for a double should work just fine if it can handle the spead. What he needs to avoid is a triple with a deep inner plate which would foul the middle ring on the upshift. I don't think you understand - the curvature of the front derailer is important if you don't want dropped chains. A "standard" double is sized for a 53 ring which is a great deal larger OD than a 45.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Actually, she nailed it spot-on. The curvature is FAR less important than the depth of the inner cage plate, or the placement of ramps on the outer cage. Modern triple FDs are basically paired with chainring sets, and if the expected gaps aren't observed, it just won't shift, period. A double with a high inner plate and no ramps on the outer plate is the ideal solution, especially when the gap between big ring and granny is less than 20T. |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Half Step and Granny - which front derailleur?
My loaded touring bike uses half step plus super granny gearing. 7
speed cassette. Either 14-16-18-21-24-28-32 or 12-14-16-18-21-24-28. Chainrings of 45-42-20. 1991 Deore DX 110/74mm bcd crankset with the separate washers for the inner chainring so a Avid Microadapter 2 allows the use of a 20 tooth inner ring. Front derailleur is a Shimano Sora 8 speed double. Bar end shifters. With a 3 tooth spread in the front rings (45-42 or 42-39), a 12-32 8 speed or a 9 speed with 11-34 or 12-34 will work quite well as half step cassettes. On May 18, 7:35*am, "James Thomson" wrote: For reasons I won't bore you with, I'd like to try a half-step and granny gearing system. I'm willing to entertain suggestions that it's ill-advised, but I'd like to try it for myself all the same, and I have most of the parts I need to get started. Likely gearing will be 45-42-granny at the front, and either 11-12-14-16-18-21-24-28 or 12-14-16-18-21-24-28-32 (eight of nine) at the rear. Questions: What front derailleur would you choose, and why? Given the above, what size granny would you shoot for? Shifters will be either older Campag Ergos, Shimano barcons, or downtube levers, so front indexing isn't an issue. Thanks, James Thomson |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Half Step and Granny - which front derailleur?
"James Thomson" wrote in message
... I'm happy to accept that there may end up being no practical benefit over a more standard triple, but as I have the parts to play with I'd like to satisfy myself of that by experience. Keep us informed about how it works in practice James. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Half Step and Granny - which front derailleur?
On May 19, 12:28*pm, "James Thomson" wrote:
"JG" a écrit: I'm pretty sure 1/2 step is dead... You have a close ratio with one chainring already. *Back in the day when I was touring with a 1/2 step 10 speed, I stopped bothering with the double shifts on the low gears. *With your setup, I doubt you will bother with the double shifts on the high gears. *There is a reason for the"road triple". There may be no such thing as too many gears, but there is such a thing as too many gears to bother shifting. I'll go into a little more detail. I tend to go off meandering on Sundays and ride as I feel, a mixture of roads and dirt, a hundred miles or so when I'm in shape for it. Sometimes I carry luggage, sometimes I hop on with impromptu chaingangs. My bikes tend to be put together with versatility in mind. Absolute top gear and absolute bottom aren't that important - I'm not racing, and I'm not too proud to push if nobody's looking. What I need is a mixture of narrow-spaced gears for cruising, and wider jumps for hacking about off-road. It doesn't make any sense to have a narrow range cassette and get stalled up trying to shift four sprockets at once on a dirt climb. I often ride a 2x9 system - 42-29 at the front with a standard (cheap) 11-32 cassette. On the road, the 12-14-16-18-21 jumps feel a little large, and these are the gears I spend a lot of time in. Adding a 45 halves these steps pretty nicely, and gives a little more top end. Among my stash of parts I have a few Stronglight 130/74 42-30 chainring combinations which I was planning to use with a chainguard/bash in the outer position again as a 2x9. Then it struck me that I might as well add the 45 (I have a few lying around) to give me the nice, smaller steps for road riding. The resulting combination looks something like a road triple with a small outer, or a mountain triple with a big middle, hence my uncertainty about which derailleur to try first. The size of the granny is negotiable - I'm happy to go a couple of teeth either way if there are likely to be shifting benefits to be had. Chainline's an issue too. I'm happy to accept that there may end up being no practical benefit over a more standard triple, but as I have the parts to play with I'd like to satisfy myself of that by experience. Coming at this from the "what you want" (from your post) and not "what you have": Well, your 42x11 is a gear-chart 103 in., and you're interested in having a little more top end. You want smaller steps for road riding in your cruising range. You need at least one low, low gear for "unimproved dirts". "How do you get there"? Ready supply of "free" parts notwithstanding, have you thought of opening up the range on your triple front rings, and closing it together on the rear? Start with a 13 or 14 (53x14 is 102") smallest cog on the cassette, use a small inner (triple) chainring, so you don't have to go so large for the biggest cog? Aiming for a few one- tooth gaps in the 14-15-16-17-18 range, with chainrings chosen to give you the ratios you're used to riding, with the holes filled in, and a low low? Tighter ratios could also give you two or three usable rations on the granny inner ring, without too much chain deflection, which could make the off-roading more enjoyable. --D-y |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Half Step and Granny - which front derailleur?
In article ,
"James Thomson" wrote: "JG" a écrit: I'm pretty sure 1/2 step is dead... You have a close ratio with one chainring already. Back in the day when I was touring with a 1/2 step 10 speed, I stopped bothering with the double shifts on the low gears. With your setup, I doubt you will bother with the double shifts on the high gears. There is a reason for the"road triple". There may be no such thing as too many gears, but there is such a thing as too many gears to bother shifting. I'll go into a little more detail. I tend to go off meandering on Sundays and ride as I feel, a mixture of roads and dirt, a hundred miles or so when I'm in shape for it. Sometimes I carry luggage, sometimes I hop on with impromptu chaingangs. My bikes tend to be put together with versatility in mind. Absolute top gear and absolute bottom aren't that important - I'm not racing, and I'm not too proud to push if nobody's looking. What I need is a mixture of narrow-spaced gears for cruising, and wider jumps for hacking about off-road. It doesn't make any sense to have a narrow range cassette and get stalled up trying to shift four sprockets at once on a dirt climb. I often ride a 2x9 system - 42-29 at the front with a standard (cheap) 11-32 cassette. On the road, the 12-14-16-18-21 jumps feel a little large, and these are the gears I spend a lot of time in. Adding a 45 halves these steps pretty nicely, and gives a little more top end. Among my stash of parts I have a few Stronglight 130/74 42-30 chainring combinations which I was planning to use with a chainguard/bash in the outer position again as a 2x9. Then it struck me that I might as well add the 45 (I have a few lying around) to give me the nice, smaller steps for road riding. The resulting combination looks something like a road triple with a small outer, or a mountain triple with a big middle, hence my uncertainty about which derailleur to try first. The size of the granny is negotiable - I'm happy to go a couple of teeth either way if there are likely to be shifting benefits to be had. Chainline's an issue too. I'm happy to accept that there may end up being no practical benefit over a more standard triple, but as I have the parts to play with I'd like to satisfy myself of that by experience. Sounds like a plan. I presently have a seven speed 14-32 running half-step, no granny. It works good, and it is not inconvenient to shift. -- Michael Press |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Half Step and Granny - which front derailleur?
On May 19, 7:35*am, "Mike Jacoubowsky" wrote:
"James Thomson" wrote in message ... | For reasons I won't bore you with, I'd like to try a half-step and granny | gearing system. I'm willing to entertain suggestions that it's ill-advised, | but I'd like to try it for myself all the same, and I have most of the parts | I need to get started. | | Likely gearing will be 45-42-granny at the front, and either | 11-12-14-16-18-21-24-28 or 12-14-16-18-21-24-28-32 (eight of nine) at the | rear. | | Questions: | | What front derailleur would you choose, and why? | | Given the above, what size granny would you shoot for? | | Shifters will be either older Campag Ergos, Shimano barcons, or downtube | levers, so front indexing isn't an issue. | | Thanks, | | James Thomson The problem you're likely to have, even with non-indexed shifters, is the chain falling in-between the chainrings when shifting from your 45 to the 42. The spacing between chainrings has to be closer together when they're so close in size, because as a chain moves further "down" it has more time to move further "in." *A 5-tooth gap is about the minimum I've found to shift well. This is an area I have quite a bit of experience in, since I went through a "half-step" phase during my junior racing days (many, many years ago) when the gear restrictions at the high end meant that a large front chainring wasn't useful. Winter series racing for seniors had similar gear restrictions -- I still have a bunch of 44 tooth rings sitting around from the '70/80s. I've used standard Campy NR for half-step and one of the Deore designed for half-step. Both worked fine -- which is more than I can say about half-step in general. Seems like a waste of money with today's gearing. -- Jay Beattie. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Half Step and Granny - which front derailleur?
On May 19, 10:35*am, "Mike Jacoubowsky" wrote:
The problem you're likely to have, even with non-indexed shifters, is the chain falling in-between the chainrings when shifting from your 45 to the 42. The spacing between chainrings has to be closer together when they're so close in size, because as a chain moves further "down" it has more time to move further "in." *A 5-tooth gap is about the minimum I've found to shift well. This is an area I have quite a bit of experience in, since I went through a "half-step" phase during my junior racing days (many, many years ago) when the gear restrictions at the high end meant that a large front chainring wasn't useful. --Mike-- * * Chain Reaction Bicycleswww.ChainReactionBicycles.com I've recently modified a 2007 XTR crank to half step. All the pins and ramps on modern chainrings do minimize "chain falling in syndrome." A friend of mine recently acquired a large lathe with a wide enough swing to mount the right crank and I took off a mm on the arms in a jif. The problem went away completely. And all the shifts are sublime compared to the chainrings of old! |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Half Step and Granny - which front derailleur?
a écrit:
Coming at this from the "what you want" (from your post) and not "what you have": Well, your 42x11 is a gear-chart 103 in., and you're interested in having a little more top end. That's not a priority. It'd be nice, but I can spin, and I'm not competing. You want smaller steps for road riding in your cruising range. Right, but I don't want to sacrifice useful medium-sized shifts on dirt. A corncob makes no sense if it just means more cogs skipped. You need at least one low, low gear for "unimproved dirts". "How do you get there"? Ready supply of "free" parts notwithstanding, have you thought of opening up the range on your triple front rings, and closing it together on the rear? Start with a 13 or 14 (53x14 is 102") smallest cog on the cassette, use a small inner (triple) chainring, so you don't have to go so large for the biggest cog? Aiming for a few one- tooth gaps in the 14-15-16-17-18 range, with chainrings chosen to give you the ratios you're used to riding, with the holes filled in, and a low low? Tighter ratios could also give you two or three usable rations on the granny inner ring, without too much chain deflection, which could make the off-roading more enjoyable. Those are all fair suggestions. My main objections are that a bigger outer chainring means less ground clearance, and a 13- or 14- up cassette with low gears seems to mean going custom. I've no real problem with that, but the attraction of the 9-speed 11-32 is that it's available cheaply off the shelf, and can be split on a 7-speed hub to give either 11-28 or 12-32, both of which are half-steppable (the 11-12 jump excluded). The main attraction of half-step though is that I haven't tried it before, and I'd like to. Given that I have most of the parts here that's reason enough. James Thomson |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Half Step and Granny - which front derailleur?
a écrit:
I have a Shimano Deore FD with a sticker saying "for half step". This is 80s vintage, from when Deore was also a touring group, and originally on a Cannondale with 50-45-28 chainrings. It has an essentially flat inner plate, that hangs down a little more than a road double FD of the 80s, but not nearly as much as modern triple derailleurs. Thanks. I've never actually seen one of these units close up - though I recall "alpine" and "half-step" versions, and the Biopace half-step gears that touring Cannondales once came with. Do you happen to know the part number? Could you point me to a picture? Thanks. James Thomson |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Half Step and Granny - which front derailleur?
"Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com a écrit:
Keep us informed about how it works in practice James. Will do. Thanks to all for the input so far. James Thomson |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How does Suntour Spirt Front Derailleur compare to newer Tiagra Front Derailleur? | ddog | Techniques | 12 | February 22nd 07 01:46 PM |
FA: SRAM X9 SHIFTERS & REAR DERAILLEUR W SHIMANO DEORE XT FRONT DERAILLEUR | ottodog | Marketplace | 0 | August 27th 06 02:45 AM |
Front shifting issues on a half-step setup | Joe LoBuglio | Techniques | 1 | June 10th 05 01:56 AM |
Shimano 105 half step? | angus | Techniques | 24 | May 31st 05 06:36 PM |
Best front derailleur for half step plus granny | Frank Miles | Techniques | 15 | July 5th 04 11:30 PM |