generators for dummies

On 3/4/2015 6:40 PM, Andre Jute wrote:


All Juden has done is regurgitate in English an article by Andreas Oehler and Olaf Schultz, thereby lending his own name, and the prestige of the CTC, to a new article that suffers all the debilities of the first one which arise from the lack of independence and the unfairness of having the employee (Oehler) of one of the manufactures (SON) under competitive test involved in the tests. This is at best naive and unprofessional of Juden; it isn't the first time it has happened, so we're very near to describing the process as malignant.

Juden's stamp of approval, presumably given on the assumption that he doesn't have the facilities, knowledge or gumption to set up such a test himself, changes absolutely nothing, except that it makes Juden another suspect, with Oehler and Schultz, in unprofessional and unfair behavior. The latter two are already permanently tainted: Oehler is and was alway unacceptable as a tester of any non-SON hub dynamos, and Schultz by his long association with and defense of Oehler has made himself unacceptable too. Juden should beware that his reputation isn't permanently damaged by his association with them.


Still no technical explanation of the (purported) problems with testing
methods? Nothing but more libel?

You're in the wrong discussion group.


--
- Frank Krygowski

On Wednesday, March 4, 2015 at 7:58:30 PM UTC-5, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 3/4/2015 6:40 PM, Andre Jute wrote:


All Juden has done is regurgitate in English an article by Andreas Oehler and Olaf Schultz, thereby lending his own name, and the prestige of the CTC, to a new article that suffers all the debilities of the first one which arise from the lack of independence and the unfairness of having the employee (Oehler) of one of the manufactures (SON) under competitive test involved in the tests. This is at best naive and unprofessional of Juden; it isn't the first time it has happened, so we're very near to describing the process as malignant.

Juden's stamp of approval, presumably given on the assumption that he doesn't have the facilities, knowledge or gumption to set up such a test himself, changes absolutely nothing, except that it makes Juden another suspect, with Oehler and Schultz, in unprofessional and unfair behavior. The latter two are already permanently tainted: Oehler is and was alway unacceptable as a tester of any non-SON hub dynamos, and Schultz by his long association with and defense of Oehler has made himself unacceptable too. Juden should beware that his reputation isn't permanently damaged by his association with them.


Still no technical explanation of the (purported) problems with testing
methods? Nothing but more libel?

You're in the wrong discussion group.


--
- Frank Krygowski

engineers wasting 100X time gabbing abt improving lighting are suspect.

engineers wasting 100X time gabbing abt improving lighting are suspect.

::::::::::::::::::::::::

AJ's rant is AAA !

841

AJ's rant is AAA !

841


.......

AJ does write well if pressed.

Not the level of Bill BS but that's a separate genre