A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » Regional Cycling » Australia
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

FS:Old Cannondale 2.8 Frame (52cm) Brisbane



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 17th 04, 08:58 PM
The Doctor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default FS:Old Cannondale 2.8 Frame (52cm) Brisbane

Hi,

Anyone intersted in an old Canondale frame?
It dates back to 1992. It is 52cm. I have most
parts for it and should be able to be put together
pretty easily.

Anthony
Ads
  #2  
Old July 20th 04, 08:17 AM
Peter Cremasco
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default FS:Old Cannondale 2.8 Frame (52cm) Brisbane

On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 19:58:01 GMT, The Doctor wrote:

Hi,

Anyone intersted in an old Canondale frame?
It dates back to 1992. It is 52cm. I have most
parts for it and should be able to be put together
pretty easily.


What does the 52cm measurement equate to. I just did a measurement from
the floor to my crotch, and that's a damned site more than 52 cm.

[scratching head... or crotch, as the case may be]


---
Cheers

PeterC

[Rushing headlong: out of control - and there ain't no stopping]
[and there's nothing you can do about it at all]
  #3  
Old July 20th 04, 08:47 AM
LT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default FS:Old Cannondale 2.8 Frame (52cm) Brisbane


"Peter Cremasco" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 19:58:01 GMT, The Doctor wrote:

Hi,

Anyone intersted in an old Canondale frame?
It dates back to 1992. It is 52cm. I have most
parts for it and should be able to be put together
pretty easily.


What does the 52cm measurement equate to. I just did a measurement from
the floor to my crotch, and that's a damned site more than 52 cm.

[scratching head... or crotch, as the case may be]


---
Cheers

PeterC

[Rushing headlong: out of control - and there ain't no stopping]
[and there's nothing you can do about it at all]


Usually it's from the center of the bottom bracket to either the center of
the top tube, or top of the top tube...


  #4  
Old July 20th 04, 11:34 AM
NickZX6R
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default FS:Old Cannondale 2.8 Frame (52cm) Brisbane

LT wrote:

"Peter Cremasco" wrote in message
...

On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 19:58:01 GMT, The Doctor wrote:


Hi,

Anyone intersted in an old Canondale frame?
It dates back to 1992. It is 52cm. I have most
parts for it and should be able to be put together
pretty easily.


What does the 52cm measurement equate to. I just did a measurement from
the floor to my crotch, and that's a damned site more than 52 cm.

[scratching head... or crotch, as the case may be]


---
Cheers

PeterC

[Rushing headlong: out of control - and there ain't no stopping]
[and there's nothing you can do about it at all]



Usually it's from the center of the bottom bracket to either the center of
the top tube, or top of the top

tube...




....and is difficult to compare without seeing it on different bikes,
given different geometries, sloping top tubes etc.

--
Nick
  #5  
Old August 4th 04, 01:33 PM
The Doctor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default FS:Old Cannondale 2.8 Frame (52cm) Brisbane

If you are in Brisbane and is interested then you can
come and check it out.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
F.S. 52cm 2004 Cannondale Optimo Saeco Edition Yash Katsumi Marketplace 2 July 2nd 04 09:45 PM
FA: ALAN Racing Frame 52cm Ian Yates General 0 October 12th 03 10:35 PM
FAQ Just zis Guy, you know? UK 27 September 5th 03 10:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.