A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Techniques
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Inside a Chainglider after 3500km with zero chain maintenance



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old April 13th 15, 11:21 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Sir Ridesalot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,270
Default Inside a Chainglider after 3500km with zero chain maintenance

On Monday, April 13, 2015 at 2:43:45 PM UTC-4, Lou Holtman wrote:
On 2015-04-13 17:59:45 +0000, jbeattie said:

On Saturday, April 11, 2015 at 3:57:08 AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
SNIP

What drag and what weight? A Rohloff system complete weighs about the
same as a derailleur system complete, and is between 1 and 4% less
efficient than common top of the line derailleur systems, in return for
which you don't have to clean it or tune it or spend constantly on
replacement parts, and you can change multiple gears at once, even at
standstill, a very considerable boon for utility riding. Check out the
first post in this thread about maintenance saving. (Admittedly, you
can get similar maintenance savings with the cheaper Shimano hub
gearboxes, but they didn't last well in my hands. Note however, Dutch
and continental experience, where service is available, unlike here, is
different for the Shimano gearboxes.)


There is a weight penalty for a road bike -- between one and two
pounds, and it's all in the back. But aside from that (which isn't
meaningful for some people), I was wondering about the long-term cost
savings. According to Lou, chain life for his Rohloff (no chaincase)
is about the same as the chain life for his derailleur bike. Lou,
correct me if I am wrong.


Ridden in the same conditions I experience no difference.

So, you would have savings on cassettes but not necessarily chains.
The next question is what is the cost/life span of a Rohloff cog.

According to that Oracle eBay, Rohloff cogs range between $32 and $54.
A Rohloff cog is $40 at JensonUSA.
http://www.jensonusa.com/!GU7rsFY-j1...eplacement-Cog


The Tiagra level cassette on my commuter bike cost $30.
http://www.universalcycles.com/shopp...06&category=41

I don't know the lifespan of a Rohloff cog, but it is probably longer
than my cassette -- plus you can flip them. Cassette life varies
depending on how diligent you are changing chains. I'd be curious to
see how the cassette and cog compare.
I agree that if you don't mind the weight and the absence of STI
shifters, some oddities in terms of shifting (backing off to get a
gear), 14 gears instead of 18/20/22, wider steps, adding oil and cost,
increased friction (not making that up; it's been measured), then it's
a great system. You can shift when stopped. I assume it doesn't miss
gears and sticking cables don't have the same effect (e.g. ghost
shifting, etc.) It lasts forever and hoses off easier.It probably makes
a superior MTB mud bike/heavy tourer.-- Jay Beattie.


You got it. No more no less. But if I was commuting in your horrible
weather I would ride a bike like this:

http://www.santosbikes.com/fietsen/lite-serie/race-lite

with dynohub of course.


--

Lou


Something that I've noticed with a lot of bikes like this one and the Surly Long-Haul Trekker is that the panniers are often mounted way back of the rear axle. At one time it was taught to have as much of the weight of the bag and contents centred over the rear axle for directional stability of the bike. Has something changed that lets you mount your pannier far over the back of the rear axle without affecting bicycle directional stability/handling?

Cheers
Ads
  #92  
Old April 13th 15, 11:29 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
JBeattie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,870
Default Inside a Chainglider after 3500km with zero chain maintenance

On Monday, April 13, 2015 at 1:04:51 PM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
On Monday, April 13, 2015 at 6:59:48 PM UTC+1, jbeattie wrote:
On Saturday, April 11, 2015 at 3:57:08 AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
SNIP

What drag and what weight? A Rohloff system complete weighs about the same as a derailleur system complete, and is between 1 and 4% less efficient than common top of the line derailleur systems, in return for which you don't have to clean it or tune it or spend constantly on replacement parts, and you can change multiple gears at once, even at standstill, a very considerable boon for utility riding. Check out the first post in this thread about maintenance saving. (Admittedly, you can get similar maintenance savings with the cheaper Shimano hub gearboxes, but they didn't last well in my hands. Note however, Dutch and continental experience, where service is available, unlike here, is different for the Shimano gearboxes.)


There is a weight penalty for a road bike -- between one and two pounds, and it's all in the back. But aside from that (which isn't meaningful for some people), I was wondering about the long-term cost savings. According to Lou, chain life for his Rohloff (no chaincase) is about the same as the chain life for his derailleur bike. Lou, correct me if I am wrong. So, you would have savings on cassettes but not necessarily chains. The next question is what is the cost/life span of a Rohloff cog.

According to that Oracle eBay, Rohloff cogs range between $32 and $54. A Rohloff cog is $40 at JensonUSA. http://www.jensonusa.com/!GU7rsFY-j1...eplacement-Cog

The Tiagra level cassette on my commuter bike cost $30. http://www.universalcycles.com/shopp...06&category=41
I don't know the lifespan of a Rohloff cog, but it is probably longer than my cassette -- plus you can flip them. Cassette life varies depending on how diligent you are changing chains. I'd be curious to see how the cassette and cog compare.

I agree that if you don't mind the weight and the absence of STI shifters, some oddities in terms of shifting (backing off to get a gear), 14 gears instead of 18/20/22, wider steps, adding oil and cost, increased friction (not making that up; it's been measured), then it's a great system. You can shift when stopped. I assume it doesn't miss gears and sticking cables don't have the same effect (e.g. ghost shifting, etc.) It lasts forever and hoses off easier.
It probably makes a superior MTB mud bike/heavy tourer.

-- Jay Beattie.


In theory a Rohloff chain should last longer than a derailleur chain because the Rohloff has a straight run and the chain doesn't get twisted. In practice, measurement is bedevilled by the fact that most people use derailleur chains (rather than singlespeed chains) anyway because they're cheaper in the store because they're more common/moved in bigger unit numbers. For instance, instead of KMC Z8 chain, I use the X8, a derailleur chain.

How much better chain life, if any, you will get depends on how you treat your chain.

The Rohloff cog is widely thought to be superior to almost anything else you can buy; everyone gets extraordinary mileages on it, but it varies greatly according to what they got before. People who're hard on other gear is hard on Rohloff externals too. It would be interesting to know what mileage Chalo, north of 350 pounds, gets out of Rohloff cogs.

Personally, I never got much over a thousand miles from a cog before I switched to Rohloff, and my Rohloff cog is now at 8000km/5000m with no signs of wear, still on its first side. But I've concluded that the Nexus cogs and chainrings I used before are utter crap, because that dire record can't be all down to me.

***

A lot of the resistance to the Rohloff is from looking at the available facts carelessly. You say the Rohloff has more drag than a derailleur system, and so it does, when both are new and utterly clean. But the Rohloff hardly wears, and what wear there is probably reduces drag, and the Rohloff's drag cannot be increased by mud or other dirt. But we all know derailleurs wear, and their performance is affected by mud and other dirt. That is one of the reasons why Berto makes a point of mentioning which of the items under test were new. So the moment your derailleur system gets splashed with mud, it becomes less efficient than the Rohloff. The likelihood is that for most of its operating life, in most conditions, the Rohloff has less drag than a derailleur system. The only people who can actually use that temporary superiority of a derailleur system when it is clean are elite athletes with plenty of clean, new bikes standing by to jump onto when the first one gets dirty and draggy.

Chances are that you would be faster autocrossing on a Rohloff than any other transmission system.

Anyway, I'm not prosetylizing for Rolloff; I wanted to discuss using the Chainglider to run a chain for its entire life on the factory lube, an extention of an idea Sheldon gave me. It is just incidental that I ran the experiment on my Rohloff bike. It would work on any hub gearbox bike or single speed.

***

You say you don't know any Rohloff owners. Actually, one of the most interesting and significant things about RBT is that on a rather technical conference no fewer than five people are known to operate one or more Rohloff hubs: Sheldon, Chalo, Pete Cresswell, Lou, and me. Among my correspondents there's a well-known Rohloff exponent up the road from you in Eugene.


You can find many unusual things in Eugene. https://www.bikefriday.com/ From the FAQ https://www.bikefriday.com/bicycles/faqs/ :

"ROHLOFF SPEEDHUB: A completely internal gearing system: single front chainring, no front or rear derailleur, no cassette, 14-speeds evenly spaced (no overlapping) gears, yet with as wide a range as a triple chainring. Operated by a single grip-type shifter. Was developed for mountain bike downhill competition.

Advantages: Bulletproof, wide range of gears.
Disadvantages: Heavy (typically almost a pound heavier than the SRAM setup), expensive, more drag and a whirring noise which is music or menace to your ears depending on whether you're a fan or not. Needs to be run in: after the first 500-1000 miles, the oil should be changed out -- a simple procedure."

More Euegen Rohloff bikes: http://co-motion.com/index.php/bikes/americano-rohloff Check-out the site, they have a bunch of Rohloff bikes -- Eugene is a f***** Rohloff Mecca! Little did I know! It's $5645 as pictured minus the S&S couplers. Not cheap. Rolf is in Eugene, too. http://www.rolfprima.com/#built -- but no Rolf Rohloff. Ken Kesey was in Eugene, but only his statue remains. http://petehelzer.com/kesey.htm




-- Jay Beattie.
  #93  
Old April 14th 15, 02:08 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,374
Default Inside a Chainglider after 3500km with zero chain maintenance

Lou

seriously, there are other needs for a $1000 greater than a Rollo

J is doing a comedy shtick ( as is Jutee but we suspect Jutee is serious)

I tolum how to reduce dirt by 50% and did he try this ? no...

he began whining abt mil spec urethanes.....

ideal material is gallon poly jug

  #94  
Old April 14th 15, 02:30 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,374
Default Inside a Chainglider after 3500km with zero chain maintenance

Your gearbox of your car is also closed and filled with oil. No?

Lou ?



  #95  
Old April 14th 15, 02:31 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
John B. Slocomb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 606
Default Inside a Chainglider after 3500km with zero chain maintenance

On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:43:08 -0400, Frank Krygowski
wrote:

On 4/12/2015 11:48 PM, Ralph Barone wrote:
John B. Slocomb wrote:
On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 10:25:39 -0400, Frank Krygowski
wrote:

On 4/12/2015 4:22 AM, James wrote:
On 12/04/15 16:26, Ralph Barone wrote:


Could you squeeze a 2 gear cluster onto a Rohloff hub? A 17-16 with a
derailleur would split the Rohloff ratios quite nicely (admittedly, by
throwing away the one main advantage of the hub).


You can get SA IGH that takes a cassette. You can then effectively do
away with the triple chainring and front derailleur.

That's a popular setup with Bike Friday folding bikes. See "What is the
SRAM 3x9 Dual Drive? " at https://www.bikefriday.com/bicycles/faqs/

(However, our Fridays have more conventional gears: front triple
cranks, 9 speed rear derailleurs.)

Or use a two or three chain rings and shift the front, which would be
a relatively easy modification.

A 50-16, for example, gives a 84.38 gear inches while a 49-16 ration
is 82.69 which is less then a shift from a 16 to 17 tooth cassette cog
which is from 84.38 to 79.41.



That's probably the easiest way to split the ratios on a Rohloff, but rear
derailleurs shift better than the front ones, so I was just exploring the
idea space.

I've still got half-step gearing on three old bikes. That means the
freewheels are wide spaced, and the two big chainrings are very close in
tooth count - for example, 52 & 47 teeth.

When chainring tooth counts are that close, shifting between them is
very easy. It's nowhere near as difficult as, say, shifting 42 to 52.

Not that I'm advocating half-step gearing, BTW. Modern setups do shift
easier.


While I've never tried it I think that it is likely that if the front
sprockets varied by only one or two teeth, as the cassette usually
does that shifting would be very similar to the rear.

It is probably a bit radical but one could design a 10 or 11 speed
chain wheel setup. Say 11 speeds on the front and 14 on the back.

Bragging Rights!
--
Cheers,

John B.
  #96  
Old April 14th 15, 02:32 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,374
Default Inside a Chainglider after 3500km with zero chain maintenance

Did you get your Easter Bunny?

you bet cost an arm ana leg too

  #97  
Old April 14th 15, 02:38 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Ralph Barone[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 321
Default Inside a Chainglider after 3500km with zero chain maintenance

John B. Slocomb wrote:
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 03:48:14 GMT, Ralph Barone
wrote:

John B. Slocomb wrote:
On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 10:25:39 -0400, Frank Krygowski
wrote:

On 4/12/2015 4:22 AM, James wrote:
On 12/04/15 16:26, Ralph Barone wrote:


Could you squeeze a 2 gear cluster onto a Rohloff hub? A 17-16 with a
derailleur would split the Rohloff ratios quite nicely (admittedly, by
throwing away the one main advantage of the hub).


You can get SA IGH that takes a cassette. You can then effectively do
away with the triple chainring and front derailleur.

That's a popular setup with Bike Friday folding bikes. See "What is the
SRAM 3x9 Dual Drive? " at https://www.bikefriday.com/bicycles/faqs/

(However, our Fridays have more conventional gears: front triple
cranks, 9 speed rear derailleurs.)

Or use a two or three chain rings and shift the front, which would be
a relatively easy modification.

A 50-16, for example, gives a 84.38 gear inches while a 49-16 ration
is 82.69 which is less then a shift from a 16 to 17 tooth cassette cog
which is from 84.38 to 79.41.



That's probably the easiest way to split the ratios on a Rohloff, but rear
derailleurs shift better than the front ones, so I was just exploring the
idea space.


Yes, that's true, but I thought that the rear derailer and chain
tensioning arm was what the internal-gear-heads bragged about not
having :-)


Ain't nobody's going home happy, I guess. :-)
  #98  
Old April 14th 15, 02:50 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Peter Howard[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 106
Default Inside a Chainglider after 3500km with zero chain maintenance

On 14/04/2015 8:21 AM, Sir Ridesalot wrote:


http://www.santosbikes.com/fietsen/lite-serie/race-lite

with dynohub of course.


--

Lou


Something that I've noticed with a lot of bikes like this one and the Surly Long-Haul Trekker is that the panniers are often mounted way back of the rear axle. At one time it was taught to have as much of the weight of the bag and contents centred over the rear axle for directional stability of the bike. Has something changed that lets you mount your pannier far over the back of the rear axle without affecting bicycle directional stability/handling?

Cheers

The pic from Lou's URL that came up for me showed a dark Race Lite with
pannier bag mounted way back on a low-rider bag rail that's integrated
with the fender mount loop. There's plenty of room, I think, to hook the
bag on further forward but I suspect they mounted it back for the photo
session so as not to obscure the nice red anodised Rohloff. Other Santos
Travel Lite pics show a more substantial looking platform rack but it
looks to be a miserably designed item with 90% of the platform behind
the rear axle. It looks like the bags can be mounted further forward on
the low-rider rail which does however have a 20kg weight limit according
to the text.
The rules haven't changed. Getting baggage weight too far behind the
rear axle still produces squirrelly handling. The Long Haul Truckers
have unusually long rear chainstays at 46cm so that you CAN get the bag
weight over the axle and still have heel-room when pedaling. Compare
that with Surly Cross Check, grandpas cyclocross frame with chainstays
of 42.5cm. My antique Peugeot PGN10 measures 41cm. Surlys own Nice Rack
rear rack in Cr.Moly steel works well on many Surly frames and many
other brands with a design that places the nose of the platform well
forward of the rear axle.
Even with largish tyre and fender the Trucker still has a cavernous
space between fender and seat-tube but it's made that way in the
interests of weight distribution when loaded.
My Trucker frame started its life with me over seven years ago with a
Rohloff but I didn't like the Rohloff spring arm chain tensioner made
necessary by the Truckers downward facing rear dropouts. The Rohloff has
since migrated to a Surly Troll frame with rearward facing "track style"
fork ends with much room for moving the axle for chain tensioning. I
still don't love that whirring Germanic coffee grinder. It's grime proof
and has a wide range for dirt road touring. But I find the even 13%
steps throughout the range to be a pain when trying to pick things up a
bit on good smooth surfaces. If there's a head wind or a steady incline
the gear I'm in is always either too high or too low for the conditions.
The Trucker frame now with Shimano XT 9 speed is more satisfactory with
closer ratios in the top half of the gear range.
PH
  #99  
Old April 14th 15, 04:10 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Ralph Barone[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 321
Default Inside a Chainglider after 3500km with zero chain maintenance

Lou Holtman wrote:
On 2015-04-13 14:43:08 +0000, Frank Krygowski said:

On 4/12/2015 11:48 PM, Ralph Barone wrote:
John B. Slocomb wrote:
On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 10:25:39 -0400, Frank Krygowski
wrote:
On 4/12/2015 4:22 AM, James wrote:
On 12/04/15 16:26, Ralph Barone wrote:
Could you squeeze a 2 gear cluster onto a Rohloff hub? A 17-16 with a
derailleur would split the Rohloff ratios quite nicely (admittedly, by
throwing away the one main advantage of the hub).
You can get SA IGH that takes a cassette. You can then effectively do
away with the triple chainring and front derailleur.
That's a popular setup with Bike Friday folding bikes. See "What is the
SRAM 3x9 Dual Drive? " at https://www.bikefriday.com/bicycles/faqs/
(However, our Fridays have more conventional gears: front triple
cranks, 9 speed rear derailleurs.)
Or use a two or three chain rings and shift the front, which would be
a relatively easy modification.
A 50-16, for example, gives a 84.38 gear inches while a 49-16 ration
is 82.69 which is less then a shift from a 16 to 17 tooth cassette cog
which is from 84.38 to 79.41.
That's probably the easiest way to split the ratios on a Rohloff, but rear
derailleurs shift better than the front ones, so I was just exploring the
idea space.
I've still got half-step gearing on three old bikes. That means the
freewheels are wide spaced, and the two big chainrings are very close
in tooth count - for example, 52 & 47 teeth.
When chainring tooth counts are that close, shifting between them is
very easy. It's nowhere near as difficult as, say, shifting 42 to 52.


That depends on the type front derailleur.






As a general rule, a rear derailleur should always shift better than a
front derailleur, since you're moving the untensioned portion of the chain.
  #100  
Old April 14th 15, 04:40 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Andre Jute[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,422
Default Inside a Chainglider after 3500km with zero chain maintenance

On Monday, April 13, 2015 at 11:29:50 PM UTC+1, jbeattie wrote:
On Monday, April 13, 2015 at 1:04:51 PM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:


Among my correspondents there's a well-known Rohloff exponent up the road from you in Eugene.


You can find many unusual things in Eugene. https://www.bikefriday.com/ From the FAQ https://www.bikefriday.com/bicycles/faqs/ :

"ROHLOFF SPEEDHUB: A completely internal gearing system: single front chainring, no front or rear derailleur, no cassette, 14-speeds evenly spaced (no overlapping) gears, yet with as wide a range as a triple chainring. Operated by a single grip-type shifter. Was developed for mountain bike downhill competition.

Advantages: Bulletproof, wide range of gears.
Disadvantages: Heavy (typically almost a pound heavier than the SRAM setup), expensive, more drag and a whirring noise which is music or menace to your ears depending on whether you're a fan or not. Needs to be run in: after the first 500-1000 miles, the oil should be changed out -- a simple procedure."

More Euegen Rohloff bikes: http://co-motion.com/index.php/bikes/americano-rohloff Check-out the site, they have a bunch of Rohloff bikes -- Eugene is a f***** Rohloff Mecca! Little did I know! It's $5645 as pictured minus the S&S couplers. Not cheap. Rolf is in Eugene, too. http://www.rolfprima.com/#built -- but no Rolf Rohloff. Ken Kesey was in Eugene, but only his statue remains. http://petehelzer.com/kesey.htm


My chum is friendly with the Co-Motion guys but found it more economical to import a bike from England when he wanted a Rohloff. Americans have some rather weird ideas on pricing bikes...

Andre JUTE
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Factory lube/chaincase experiment (X8 chain, Chainglider chain case,Surly SS & Rohloff gears) Andre Jute[_2_] Techniques 15 July 14th 13 08:07 PM
4605km from one chain: KMC X8 and Hebie Chainglider does the business Andre Jute[_2_] Techniques 26 June 19th 11 04:54 PM
Chain rub on inside of Front Derailleur [email protected] Techniques 5 July 3rd 06 01:46 PM
Front Derailleur problems (chain falls off inside) Post to newsgroup General 11 October 25th 03 03:18 AM
Front Derailleur problems (chain falls off inside) Post to newsgroup Techniques 1 October 23rd 03 08:23 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.