NGM is: Real Names vs. User Names

"Eugene Miya" wrote in message
news:446b8b8e$1@darkstar...

[newsgroups restored]

This idiot continues to keep messing around with the newsgroups. Apparently,
it is my karma to be forever stuck with idiots.

In article ,
Edward Dolan wrote:
There was a group of cyclists from the Chicago area (Monkey Island) that
set
up a blog site and it consisted of nothing but obscene and porn attacks on
other cyclists and other groups. No thank you. I want text only when it
comes to Usenet. I am even very leery of links and will almost never go to
them unless I really trust the poster.

So?
Reading a web site, blog or news group is a choice.

I have already explained to you that it is very easy for a criminal vandal
troll to destroy a newsgroup with text only. It is even easier if pictures
are permitted. What is there about this that you do not understand?

I know some of the various guys who came up with links.

This is a weak argument for text (one site? you are wasting my time).

That one site was being linked by various posters on several cycling
newsgroups. And then the blog ended up being extensively discussed by some
few, much to the dismay of the majority of the group. If you had been the
moderator , you would never have allowed any of that crap to ever appear on
your forum, that is for god damn sure!

Yes, I think only moderated groups will work. An unmoderated group will be
I thought you said you didn't know much about computers.
chock full of idiots who will say lots of nasty things. That is human
nature.

Your interspersed remark in the middle of my statement marks you as an
idiot. Congratulations! That is how I shall treat you henceforth.

Human nature appears more complex than this.
You can say it varies across religious background values.
If you are unfamiliar with usenet, news protocols, this diminishes
your comment.

I know all I will ever have to know about human nature. That is why
newsgroups have to be moderated, but preferably not by a numskull like you.

But do you really just want to exchange information with others? That can
get rather dull after awhile and sooner or later you have exhausted the
subject. I do like the interplay of personality on an unmoderated group. I
think that would be pretty much missing on a moderated group. A little
fireworks from time to time makes for a more interesting group.

It depends on the composition of the group.
We might as well give up all telecommunication technologies were what
you say is the case.

No, groups just need a moderator (an editor). I know what newsgroups are
worth and they are not worth anything.They are only good for fun and games.
Most moderated groups are dead and dying because they are so dull. In fact
they designed for dullards like you. What are you doing on Usenet if you do
not like some fireworks?

talk.politics.*.
Well, I guess I really don't want pure argument. Life gets pretty grim
if
that is all one is doing.
Then change the paradigm.

My paradigm is perfect for unmoderated newsgroups. I assure you I would
know
how to pass muster on a moderated newsgroup. But there are just too many
idiots on unmoderated newsgroups and they need to be dealt with by the
likes of me.

Well impress us.

I already have, but you are too stupid to comprehend anything. Jon Meinecke
was another idiot who was unable to appreciate my Greatness. He resorted to
a kill file like all cowards and scoundrels. Meinecke was made for a
moderated forum. He has no business ever being on Usenet. He is nothing but
a plodder - just like you are!

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota