|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Tom Young wrote: (Snip) There are lots of good restaurants in Europe and the Caribbean. I've heard that. Hope I get the chance to sample some more of them someday. Steve |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Steve wrote: Choke on this Liberal Socialists............ Dumbass - I agree. Keep the uneducated, dumb**** middle class in its place. K. Gringioni. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Steve wrote:
On 10/23/04 11:04 AM, in article , "Kyle Legate" wrote: Steve wrote: Choke on this Liberal Socialists............ Steve, you douche, why do you post political garbage to a bike racing group? Each of the candidates is just a slightly different perspective of the same ****ing car wreck. You should be asking yourself if the same party with two different names is really a democracy, and if the international observers will speak up when voting irregularities arise. Kyle, you ****ing prick, some people are more interested in this than the crappy cycling **** spewed in here lately.... Feel free to leave, then, in search for a more interesting newgroup. Don't let the door hit your fat ass on the way out. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Paul Krugman, the former Enron advisor? The guy is lousy. Only the NY
Times would ever hire someone that moronic to be a columnist. "Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS" wrote in message ... Steve wrote: Choke on this Liberal Socialists............ http://washington.news.designerz.com...steeper-tax-cu ts-in-us.html "Nobel laureate (in Economics) calls for steeper tax cuts in US" AFP/Royal Swedish Academy of Science-HO/File Edward Prescott, who picked up the Nobel Prize for Economics, said President George W. Bush's tax rate cuts were "pretty small" and should have been bigger OTOH: http://econ-www.mit.edu/faculty/dorn...oad.php?ids=16 and, I wouldn't expect you to listen to Paul Krugman, but anyway... http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/r..._krugman.shtml Steve -- Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS http://www.dentaltwins.com Brooklyn, NY 718-258-5001 |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
The deficit as a % of GDP is not very high. It has been higher.
"Howard Kveck" wrote in message ... In article , Steve wrote: On 10/23/04 12:00 PM, in article , "Howard Kveck" wrote: http://openlettertothepresident.org/ It is widely known that most of upper crust academia is Liberal....... Well, Steve, can you offer any factual rebuttal to what they said? Just the fact that you think they might be liberals because they're part of academia isn't really an argument, you know. After all, isn't Prescott, the guy originally cited by you, a member of academia? Why does his opinion carry more weight than those others? By the way, I knnow that the Bush admin. has stated that the massive federal deficit is overwhelmingly due to the war on terror and homeland security spending increases, but the Congressional Budget Office released figures recently that plainly showed that over 60% of the deficit was due to the tax cuts. A lot of them even believe (and regularly say) Castro is "A great leader!" WHAT THE ****?!?!?! Wow. Cites, please? -- tanx, Howard "It looks like the squirrel's been showing everybody where he keeps his nuts." remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok? |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"Sam" wrote: Paul Krugman, the former Enron advisor? The guy is lousy. Only the NY Times would ever hire someone that moronic to be a columnist. His role as "advisor" has been overrated by those who don't like his POV. http://www.wws.princeton.edu/~pkrugman/enron.html -- tanx, Howard "It looks like the squirrel's been showing everybody where he keeps his nuts." remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok? |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Howard Kveck wrote: ...but the Congressional Budget Office released figures recently that plainly showed that over 60% of the deficit was due to the tax cuts. No, it is not due to tax cuts. That is a bunch of baloney. It's because democrats (terrible) and republicans (just bad) won't slaughter the sacred cows. Krugman stated in the Russert interview that he thought the administration was actually trying to do a "set up" and _force_ them to eventually cut the size of government. He hated it, of course. I, on the other hand, think it is okay if there is no other way do reduce spending. Although I'd rather have them simply do it "straight up." "No matter how thin you slice it, it is still baloney." -- Judge Judy "Sacred cows run in herds." -- David Stockman |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 01:08:56 GMT, g-spot
wrote: Krugman stated in the Russert interview that he thought the administration was actually trying to do a "set up" and _force_ them to eventually cut the size of government. He hated it, of course. I, on the other hand, think it is okay if there is no other way do reduce spending. This is one of the stupider ideas I've ever heard Run up a massive deficit, with the resulting inefficiences that places on the economy, in the hopes of eventually reducing government spending. You're insane. That's like "Oh yeah, I had to shoot my pregnant daugter because she was headed to a clinic to get an abortion that just ain't right." Brilliant. JT **************************** Remove "remove" to reply Visit http://www.jt10000.com **************************** |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|