A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Techniques
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Steel Frame Set Material Comparison



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 28th 17, 12:25 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
John B.[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,697
Default Steel Frame Set Material Comparison


http://www.bgcycles.com/new-page-1/

This might be labeled as "A Tale of two frame tube sets" and I, at
least, have referred to the story a time or two with out being able to
locate the original article.

I came across it this morning by accident and thought it might be of
interest.

--
Cheers,

John B.

Ads
  #2  
Old May 28th 17, 03:41 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,345
Default Steel Frame Set Material Comparison

On Saturday, May 27, 2017 at 4:25:45 PM UTC-7, John B. wrote:
http://www.bgcycles.com/new-page-1/

This might be labeled as "A Tale of two frame tube sets" and I, at
least, have referred to the story a time or two with out being able to
locate the original article.

I came across it this morning by accident and thought it might be of
interest.


I also found this - I think it must be pretty old though.

what is the hierarchy in the world of steel tubing for bike frames? Here’s a generalized overview/ranking (low to high), using the popular Reynolds line to represent the higher quality steels (Wabi uses the types indicated in bold):

Hi Ten: very inexpensive, and very heavy, the lowest quality level of steel used for adult bicycle frames
Cro-Mo: higher quality alloyed steel, lighter weight than Hi Ten
Butted Cro-Mo: lighter still, probably the most widely used tubing for mid priced ($650- 750) steel fixed gear bikes. It comes in many, many names, and is usually what’s used in “proprietary” tube sets from many bike manufacturers, to give it a less generic sounding name.
Reynolds 520 (note- all of the Reynolds tubing listed is butted): Reynold's version of the standard butted Cro-Mo, their entry level butted tube set
Reynolds 631: the next level up, air hardened, with higher strength and thinner wall thicknesses available
Reynolds 725: next level up, air hardened and heat treated, with thinner wall thicknesses available
Reynolds 853: very high end steel, thinner still, and lighter
Reynolds 953: a variant of stainless steel, this one rivals Ti and carbon fiber on weight, but with the ride of steel
Columbus Spirit Niobium: similar in weight to the 953, the Spirit is one of the lightest steel tubes sets available
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Comparison of Auminium, Steel and Carbon forks? blackhead Techniques 87 May 6th 08 05:14 AM
New frame material J General 10 May 27th 05 02:57 PM
Need advice on road bike frame material - alum, composite, or comp/steel Mike General 19 February 14th 04 08:58 AM
Frame Material for a Clydesdale Brian Nelson General 3 November 6th 03 09:23 PM
Best material for frame! Zilla Mountain Biking 7 October 20th 03 02:07 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.