Immigration: The Rule of Law Awakens in Arizona

On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:48:06 -0700 (PDT), "f. barnes"
wrote:

By Frosty Wooldridge

My daddy used to say, “If you want it done right, you have to do it
yourself!”

After 30 years of the U.S. Congress and four presidents failing to
enforce our immigration laws-- Arizona, led by State Senator Russell
Pearce and a brave band of lawmakers—passed SB 1070, the most diligent
and forceful immigration law in the nation.

In excess of 460,000 criminal illegal aliens find themselves facing,
for the first time in 30 years, the rule of law. As Barney Fife said,
“Andy, if we allow those criminals to get away with breaking the law,
we’ll just get more of ‘em.”

“You’re right,” Sheriff Taylor said. “Go arrest them and let’s get
things back to normal in Mayberry.”

“We’re tired of tens of thousands of stolen vehicles,” one Arizona
citizen said. “We’re the kidnapping capital of America. Arizonans fear
for their lives daily. Illegals have destroyed our schools, hospitals
and communities. They fill our prisons. They kill our cops, ranchers
and ordinary citizens. We’re tired of it.”

Read mo http://www.borderfirereport.net/fros...in-arizona.php

Beautiful.

cole

On Apr 26, 8:14*pm, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:48:06 -0700 (PDT), "f. barnes"



wrote:
By Frosty Wooldridge

My daddy used to say, “If you want it done right, you have to do it
yourself!”

After 30 years of the U.S. Congress and four presidents failing to
enforce our immigration laws-- Arizona, led by State Senator Russell
Pearce and a brave band of lawmakers—passed SB 1070, the most diligent
and forceful immigration law in the nation.

In excess of 460,000 criminal illegal aliens find themselves facing,
for the first time in 30 years, the rule of law. As Barney Fife said,
“Andy, if we allow those criminals to get away with breaking the law,
we’ll just get more of ‘em.”

“You’re right,” Sheriff Taylor said. “Go arrest them and let’s get
things back to normal in Mayberry.”

“We’re tired of tens of thousands of stolen vehicles,” one Arizona
citizen said. “We’re the kidnapping capital of America. Arizonans fear
for their lives daily. Illegals have destroyed our schools, hospitals
and communities. They fill our prisons. They kill our cops, ranchers
and ordinary citizens. We’re tired of it.”

Read mo *http://www.borderfirereport.net/fros...ration-the-rul...

Beautiful.

cole

Go after those who profit from immigration (those high in the
predation game) if you want to have to succeed in curbing illegal
immigration. The rest is BS.

On 2010-04-27, TibetanMonkey, the-Monkey-with-the-Bag-of-**** wrote:

Go after those who profit from immigration (those high in the
predation game) if you want to have to succeed in curbing illegal
immigration. The rest is BS.


You're precisely correct.

The short summary of the Arizona law is "Let's divert local
law enforcement to ineffectually hassling brown people".

The clauses regarding *employing* illegals are littered with
the word "knowingly", which translates into "just kidding" in
English. "Knowingly" is a word you'll seldom find in statutes
governing traffic violations, armed robbery, or drug trafficking;
it's what legislatures put in white collar crime statutes when
they want to be appearing to do something about a problem but
actually want to give good Republican contributors a get-out-of-
jail-free card.

And you gotta love "The McDonalds Loophole" in the law so fast
food restaurants and whatnot can keep employing illegals.

If anyone was serious about this thing rather than just wanting
to roll a few spics, they'd be writing statutes that would really
bite employers and put a few nice white Republican business owners
in jail. That would solve the illegal immigration problem pretty
much overnight.

And before any room-temperature-IQ wingnut gives me any **** about
being a bleeding heart "librul", STFU. I want to end the Mexican
invasion more than you do. I'm just not stupid, and I'd like to
actually solve the problem rather than just play with my dick and
bully some brown people.

Cheers, Wolf.

On Apr 28, 2:42*pm, "Wolf Leverich" wrote:
On 2010-04-27, TibetanMonkey, the-Monkey-with-the-Bag-of-**** wrote:

Go after those who profit from immigration (those high in the
predation game) if you want to have to succeed in curbing illegal
immigration. The rest is BS.

You're precisely correct.

The short summary of the Arizona law is "Let's divert local
law enforcement to ineffectually hassling brown people".

The clauses regarding *employing* illegals are littered with
the word "knowingly", which translates into "just kidding" in
English. *"Knowingly" is a word you'll seldom find in statutes
governing traffic violations, armed robbery, or drug trafficking;
it's what legislatures put in white collar crime statutes when
they want to be appearing to do something about a problem but
actually want to give good Republican contributors a get-out-of-
jail-free card.

And you gotta love "The McDonalds Loophole" in the law so fast
food restaurants and whatnot can keep employing illegals.

If anyone was serious about this thing rather than just wanting
to roll a few spics, they'd be writing statutes that would really
bite employers and put a few nice white Republican business owners
in jail. *That would solve the illegal immigration problem pretty
much overnight. *

And before any room-temperature-IQ wingnut gives me any **** about
being a bleeding heart "librul", STFU. *I want to end the Mexican
invasion more than you do. *I'm just not stupid, and I'd like to
actually solve the problem rather than just play with my dick and
bully some brown people.

Cheers, Wolf.

You ain't stupid redneck, I see. But the game of the politicians is
that of survival in the next elections, and they won't bother the fat
cats.

On 28/04/10 11:42 AM, Wolf Leverich wrote:
On 2010-04-27, TibetanMonkey, wrote:

Go after those who profit from immigration (those high in the
predation game) if you want to have to succeed in curbing illegal
immigration. The rest is BS.


You're precisely correct.

The short summary of the Arizona law is "Let's divert local
law enforcement to ineffectually hassling brown people".

In reality the summary is "let's pass a law that will encourage illegals
to go to California, New Mexico and Texas." Since Arizona can't deport
anyone, the law would make things worse for them if it had the effect of
causing more imprisonment.

The federal government has decided not to enforce immigration laws and
the states have to pay the price. Arizona has decided that they'd like
other border states to pay instead of them.

Alas, it is likely to backfire on Arizona. They've already lost six
major conventions since they passed the new law. Those conventions will
likely end up in California. Eventually the law will be thrown out and
it will give the right wing wackos something else to complain about.

Someone even wanted to boycott Arizona Iced Tea which has nothing to do
with Arizona.

On Apr 28, 11:31*pm, SMS wrote:
On 28/04/10 11:42 AM, Wolf Leverich wrote:

On 2010-04-27, TibetanMonkey, *wrote:

Go after those who profit from immigration (those high in the
predation game) if you want to have to succeed in curbing illegal
immigration. The rest is BS.

You're precisely correct.

The short summary of the Arizona law is "Let's divert local
law enforcement to ineffectually hassling brown people".

In reality the summary is "let's pass a law that will encourage illegals
to go to California, New Mexico and Texas." Since Arizona can't deport
anyone, the law would make things worse for them if it had the effect of
causing more imprisonment.

The federal government has decided not to enforce immigration laws and
the states have to pay the price. Arizona has decided that they'd like
other border states to pay instead of them.

Alas, it is likely to backfire on Arizona. They've already lost six
major conventions since they passed the new law. Those conventions will
likely end up in California. Eventually the law will be thrown out and
it will give the right wing wackos something else to complain about.

Someone even wanted to boycott Arizona Iced Tea which has nothing to do
with Arizona.

Since Arizona can't deport
anyone, the law would make things worse for them if it had the effect
of
causing more imprisonment.
---
use them for slave labor and recoup their losses

Would you rather have criminals running amuck, or in jails
and prisons? Me. Well, I'd rather build a lot more Sherrif
Joe type camps, rather than having illegals out on the
streets, committing more crimes.

--
Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
..


"plainolamerican"
wrote in message
...

Since Arizona can't deport
anyone, the law would make things worse for them if it had
the effect
of
causing more imprisonment.
---
use them for slave labor and recoup their losses