A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Techniques
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The price of lightweight balloons



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old August 8th 09, 05:18 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Andre Jute[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,422
Default The price of lightweight balloons

When even a puttering randonneur gets up into the big bikes and the
big balloon tyres, he suddenly acquires something in common with the
leanest roadie on the skinniest tyres: he becomes a weigh weenie. For
instance, in the biggest size, 50-622, going from the 995gr Big Apple
to the 790g Big Apple Liteskin saves seven and a quarter ounces, or
damn nearly a pound between a pair of tyres.

Someone else will have to say if you lose anything in comfort or
puncture-proofing or durability by going from the standard Big Apple
to the Liteskin. I've only had the Liteskin.

In tubes the weight saving is even more. Going from the 220gr Schwalbe
Type 19 standard tube suitable for Big Apples to the 140gr
lightweight tube Type 19a saves three whole ounces per tube.

Between the lightweight tyres and the lightweight tubes then, one
saves a pound and a quarter per bike (no spares carried! -- nearer a
pound and a half if a single spare tube is carried).

But there is a price. It probably isn't much to a racer who checks the
inflation of his tyres before every ride. But it matters, though
probably not too much, to the utility/recreation biker one finds on
balloons.

It turns out that the extra light tubes are more permeable. They lose
air more quickly. Whereas it is perfectly okay to check the inflation
in a standard Big Apple with the standard Schwalbe T19 tube every
month or even every two months in the certain knowledge that it won't
lose enough air by natural processes to go out of bounds (unless run
on the very lower limit, of course), the lightweight T19A tubed tyre's
inflation must be checked every fortnight, more often if you run them
closer to the lower limit of inflation.

After some experimentation, I have settled at running my Big Apple
Liteskins with the Type 19A lightweight tubes at 2 bar front and rear.
That gives one enough comfort and plenty of control if precision is
required in steering or handling. This is a bit higher than was
initially reported by Lou and also by me: I've gone for the slightly
higher inflation to give me a (perhaps merely psychological) margin of
error against snakebites for the occasional pothole taken at speed
while talking to the pedalpals.

Starting from 2 bar, weather cool and tyres lightly used (only short
fast sections) and thus unlikely ever to be hot for long, the T19A
lightweight Schwalbe tube self-deinflates to 1.9 bar in a fortnight
and 1.8 bar in three weeks. The permissible minimum inflation for the
60-622 Big Apples is 1.5 bar, so this is a pretty fat safety margin if
you let the inflation check go another week or fortnight.

Andre Jute
It's not talent that makes you (fill in whatever you want to be), it
is persistent attention to detail
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lightweight 29er acl Unicycling 3 January 29th 08 12:46 PM
lightweight hybrids? louise Techniques 5 May 12th 06 05:08 PM
Aerodynamics vs. Lightweight Derk Techniques 42 April 18th 06 04:49 AM
Lightweight Bigwheel AlbertKarel Unicycling 41 August 27th 04 11:16 PM
Lightweight Just zis Guy, you know? UK 5 August 10th 04 01:20 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.