|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Clarendon Street: Response from Port Phillip
I received a response to my letter highlighting the impact of the tram
upgrades on cyclists. -------------------------- Tram Upgrades and Bikes Thank you for your letter of 15 January 2005 regarding the impact of the Tram Priority Pilot works in Clarendon Street on cyclists. As you are no doubt aware, the Tram Priority Pilot is a state government initiative, being implemented by VicRoads and Yarra Trams, with the support of the City of Port Phillip. The principal aims of the pilot program are to improve the efficiency of tram movement by reducing the delays caused by vehicles at intersections, improving accessibility for pedestrians by building kerb extensions at tram stops, and generally re-allocating priority in Clarendon Street from motor vehicles to public transport and pedestrians. I acknowledge that the impact of the new kerb extensions on cyclists have been well summarised in you(sic) letter and attached photos, and that the loss of the parking lane in sections where the new tram stops are located are less than ideal for cyclists. These impacts will be considered in the evaluation of the pilot program's performance, and adjustments may be made if it is agreed that they are safe and workable. However, other impacts represent an actual improvement for cyclists - namely the improved safety for cyclists turning right, and the general reduction in traffic speed caused by vehicular congestion. Finally, Clarendon Street is closely paralleled by two designated bike routes (Cecil Street and Moray Street), which offer wide bike lanes and lower traffic volumes. It is therefore considered preferable for cyclists to utilise these two north-south routes, and to access the Clarendon Street activity centre via connecting roads. Please don't hesitate to contact me on number supplied if you would like to discuss this matter. Yours faithfully, name supplied Sustainable Transport Engineer ------------------------ So in a nutshell, yes there is a problem but cyclists can use other roads, right? The bit about improved safety for cyclists turning right is an absolute gem; maybe someone should tell him that cyclists can hook-turn at any junction in Victoria... -- Cheers Euan |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Clarendon Street: Response from Port Phillip
dave Wrote: Got an email addy I will tell em. perhaps we all should. beauracrats only listen if they realise they are dealing with sizeabl number -- flyingdutch |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Clarendon Street: Response from Port Phillip
dave Wrote: they only listen if they think they have something to lose. No, being beauracrats evrything they recieve in writing has to b submitted on the matter, and seeing as itts a piot program all writte submissions mut be read/taken-into-account when it comes to decisio time. You can write and do something (how big a deal that is, well that's u to you...) or you can decide to do nothing and complain later that the didnt fix it bcos they failed to employ mental telepathy as to wha everyone affected thought about the scenario F"Rome perfected beauracracy, then it evolved into its pure form Choas!" Dutc -- flyingdutch |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Clarendon Street: Response from Port Phillip
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Clarendon Street: Response from Port Phillip
flyingdutch wrote:
dave Wrote: Got an email addy I will tell em. perhaps we all should. beauracrats only listen if they realise they are dealing with sizeable numbers they only listen if they think they have something to lose. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hurricane Ridge, Port Angeles, WA | Unirene | Unicycling | 13 | July 19th 05 05:12 PM |
Clarendon street again | [email protected] | Australia | 2 | January 13th 05 07:11 PM |
Clarendon Street, Melbourne | [email protected] | Australia | 26 | January 11th 05 03:37 AM |
What is your definition of "Street" riding? | johnfoss | Unicycling | 48 | November 25th 04 03:45 PM |
The way to break out of the pro-car, anti-car debate? | DRS | Australia | 73 | June 2nd 04 12:58 PM |