|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
January 25th 14, 08:25 AM
posted to uk.rec.cycling
|
|||
|
|||
Only an unreasonable person could disagree
|
| Ads |
|
#2
January 25th 14, 09:43 AM
posted to uk.rec.cycling
|
|||
|
|||
|
Only an unreasonable person could disagree
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 08:25:02 +0000, Mrcheerful
wrote: http://road.cc/content/news/109070-m...g-licence-back Yes, it is totally unreasonable to claim that anyone should be allowed to use their vehicle on the road without proper testing and training. ----- Please help me dispose of unwanted virtual currency: Bitcoin:15t5vy9tRzFcoN9mMeosPuegxbtd94JBk4 Litecoin:LKJyrn8K1SCDZFGnGzSj4cbQEF4xrE9WjS
|
|
#3
January 25th 14, 10:11 AM
posted to uk.rec.cycling
|
|||
|
|||
|
Only an unreasonable person could disagree
On 25/01/2014 09:43, Cassandra wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 08:25:02 +0000, Mrcheerful wrote: http://road.cc/content/news/109070-m...g-licence-back Yes, it is totally unreasonable to claim that anyone should be allowed to use their vehicle on the road without proper testing and training. ----- Please help me dispose of unwanted virtual currency: Bitcoin:15t5vy9tRzFcoN9mMeosPuegxbtd94JBk4 Litecoin:LKJyrn8K1SCDZFGnGzSj4cbQEF4xrE9WjS What a shame that millions of cyclist do then. And also what a shame that occasionally some of you motorist scum end up in prison for your awful and aggressive driving, even when you have had that testing and training. Anyway, introducing a test and compulsory training for cyclists would be totally disproportionate.
|
|
#4
January 25th 14, 11:03 AM
posted to uk.rec.cycling
|
|||
|
|||
|
Only an unreasonable person could disagree
"Mrcheerful" wrote in message ... On 25/01/2014 09:43, Cassandra wrote: On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 08:25:02 +0000, Mrcheerful wrote: http://road.cc/content/news/109070-m...g-licence-back Yes, it is totally unreasonable to claim that anyone should be allowed to use their vehicle on the road without proper testing and training. ----- Please help me dispose of unwanted virtual currency: Bitcoin:15t5vy9tRzFcoN9mMeosPuegxbtd94JBk4 Litecoin:LKJyrn8K1SCDZFGnGzSj4cbQEF4xrE9WjS What a shame that millions of cyclist do then. And also what a shame that occasionally some of you motorist scum end up in prison for your awful and aggressive driving, even when you have had that testing and training. Anyway, introducing a test and compulsory training for cyclists would be totally disproportionate. Any measures should be brought in if they neither inconvenience or cost cyclists money, then, Bwian?
|
|
#5
January 25th 14, 11:42 AM
posted to uk.rec.cycling
|
|||
|
|||
|
Only an unreasonable person could disagree
On 25/01/2014 09:43, Cassandra wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 08:25:02 +0000, Mrcheerful wrote: http://road.cc/content/news/109070-m...g-licence-back Yes, it is totally unreasonable to claim that anyone should be allowed to use their vehicle on the road without proper testing and training. +1.
|
|
#6
January 25th 14, 12:05 PM
posted to uk.rec.cycling
|
|||
|
|||
|
Only an unreasonable person could disagree
On 25/01/2014 11:03, Tarcap wrote:
"Mrcheerful" wrote in message ... On 25/01/2014 09:43, Cassandra wrote: On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 08:25:02 +0000, Mrcheerful wrote: http://road.cc/content/news/109070-m...g-licence-back Yes, it is totally unreasonable to claim that anyone should be allowed to use their vehicle on the road without proper testing and training. ----- Please help me dispose of unwanted virtual currency: Bitcoin:15t5vy9tRzFcoN9mMeosPuegxbtd94JBk4 Litecoin:LKJyrn8K1SCDZFGnGzSj4cbQEF4xrE9WjS What a shame that millions of cyclist do then. And also what a shame that occasionally some of you motorist scum end up in prison for your awful and aggressive driving, even when you have had that testing and training. Anyway, introducing a test and compulsory training for cyclists would be totally disproportionate. Any measures should be brought in if they neither inconvenience or cost cyclists money, then, Bwian? Why shouldn't road safety measures cost cyclists money, Catcrap?
|
|
#7
January 25th 14, 01:29 PM
posted to uk.rec.cycling
|
|||
|
|||
|
Only an unreasonable person could disagree
"JNugent" wrote in message ... On 25/01/2014 11:03, Tarcap wrote: "Mrcheerful" wrote in message ... On 25/01/2014 09:43, Cassandra wrote: On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 08:25:02 +0000, Mrcheerful wrote: http://road.cc/content/news/109070-m...g-licence-back Yes, it is totally unreasonable to claim that anyone should be allowed to use their vehicle on the road without proper testing and training. ----- Please help me dispose of unwanted virtual currency: Bitcoin:15t5vy9tRzFcoN9mMeosPuegxbtd94JBk4 Litecoin:LKJyrn8K1SCDZFGnGzSj4cbQEF4xrE9WjS What a shame that millions of cyclist do then. And also what a shame that occasionally some of you motorist scum end up in prison for your awful and aggressive driving, even when you have had that testing and training. Anyway, introducing a test and compulsory training for cyclists would be totally disproportionate. Any measures should be brought in if they neither inconvenience or cost cyclists money, then, Bwian? Why shouldn't road safety measures cost cyclists money, Catcrap? Because cyclists are a tight bunch, Bwian, and only want to spend other people's money, but not their own, Bwian.
|
|
#8
January 25th 14, 06:51 PM
posted to uk.rec.cycling
|
|||
|
|||
|
Only an unreasonable person could disagree
On 25/01/2014 13:29, Tarcap wrote:
"JNugent" wrote in message ... On 25/01/2014 11:03, Tarcap wrote: "Mrcheerful" wrote in message ... On 25/01/2014 09:43, Cassandra wrote: On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 08:25:02 +0000, Mrcheerful wrote: http://road.cc/content/news/109070-m...g-licence-back Yes, it is totally unreasonable to claim that anyone should be allowed to use their vehicle on the road without proper testing and training. ----- Please help me dispose of unwanted virtual currency: Bitcoin:15t5vy9tRzFcoN9mMeosPuegxbtd94JBk4 Litecoin:LKJyrn8K1SCDZFGnGzSj4cbQEF4xrE9WjS What a shame that millions of cyclist do then. And also what a shame that occasionally some of you motorist scum end up in prison for your awful and aggressive driving, even when you have had that testing and training. Anyway, introducing a test and compulsory training for cyclists would be totally disproportionate. Any measures should be brought in if they neither inconvenience or cost cyclists money, then, Bwian? Why shouldn't road safety measures cost cyclists money, Catcrap? Because cyclists are a tight bunch, Bwian, and only want to spend other people's money, but not their own, Bwian. That wasn't what I asked. Now stop being stupid, read the question again, and answer it.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| URCM - yet another unreasonable rejection | Judith[_4_] | UK | 0 | January 20th 13 12:06 PM |
| A heavier person descends faster than a lighter person | Koen De Poorter | Racing | 46 | November 13th 05 01:06 AM |
| One old person + One young person on a tandem bike | Joe Canuck | General | 5 | June 2nd 05 02:08 AM |
| uk person with tv | joemarshall | Unicycling | 9 | March 24th 04 11:49 AM |
| Who's this person? | andrew_carter | Unicycling | 6 | January 16th 04 12:39 AM |
Linear Mode
