A cyclist attacks pedestrians?

Never happens, does it?
http://findarticles.com/p/news-artic.../ai_n51153101/

On Feb 28, 11:56*am, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
Never happens, does it?http://findarticles.com/p/news-artic...he/mi_8113/is_...

Of course it does you silly man. Did anyone ever claim otherwise?

Nov 2009? How far back are you going to go with your little mission?
(whatever that is)

On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 05:14:54 -0800 (PST), PhilO
wrote:

On Feb 28, 11:56*am, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
Never happens, does it?http://findarticles.com/p/news-artic...he/mi_8113/is_...

Of course it does you silly man. Did anyone ever claim otherwise?

Nov 2009? How far back are you going to go with your little mission?
(whatever that is)


To attract stupid ****witted remarks from you?

I like the reference to the cyclist as "lowlife"

On Feb 28, 3:00*pm, Judith wrote:


Is the description "lowlife" in common usage when referring to
cyclists?

Seems so from what I have seen, reminds me of the old saying "if the
cap fits......."

On Feb 28, 3:00*pm, Judith wrote:

Is the description "lowlife" in common usage when referring to
cyclists?

No. I think they were referring to his actions, not his possession of
a bicycle. Don't you?

On 28/02/2011 22:38, PhilO wrote:
On Feb 28, 3:00 pm, wrote:

Is the description "lowlife" in common usage when referring to
cyclists?

No. I think they were referring to his actions, not his possession of
a bicycle. Don't you?

No. Lowlife & cyclist seems about right. The term 'lycra lout' has
entered the lexicon after all.

--
Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk

On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:49:13 +0000, The Medway Handyman wrote:


No. Lowlife & cyclist seems about right. The term 'lycra lout' has
entered the lexicon after all.

Many bicyclists do not wear lycra.
And many non-bicyclists wear lycra.



--
67.4% of statistics are made up.

On 01/03/2011 01:41, Peter Keller wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:49:13 +0000, The Medway Handyman wrote:


No. Lowlife& cyclist seems about right. The term 'lycra lout' has
entered the lexicon after all.

Many bicyclists do not wear lycra.
And many non-bicyclists wear lycra.

That doesn't matter.

It's just a term, and as it happens, one which has caught on (in certain
circles at least).

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/03/2011 05:28, Mr. Benn wrote:

You're still not going to condemn the cyclist then. Do you think the
cyclist's action was acceptable? I can only assume that you do.

I am sure Phil would join with me in condemning without reservation
*any* person whose dangerous, illegal or negligent behaviour while in
control of *any* kind of vehicle causes danger or injury to anyone,
especially someone more vulnerable than themselves.

- --
Guy Chapman, http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
The usenet price promise: all opinions are guaranteed
to be worth at least what you paid for them.
PGP public key at http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/pgp-public.key
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNcg2AAAoJEJx9ogI8T+W/HNkH/1sxi1nvhZyQ0RS0ZIUCFLdz
qCAQzDEBl7/B+BwHvr0G/uLHIFFHBhHUOpOdUymqOFM0bnaJPvn+M5x3QIXGP9EJ
szhfATdEGPTVBN4CMEVtBFSZ0zJEZi5eLqzGRSyFX/lHEQpxGNbT3Zmwnqp2tyUH
AcMNcnWN7xRkXUGl07IWM5xCs5G7GX8dpqlEfdP2pSH2rjvPDJ 0eUhyRaZPBEpSp
d1SbuT2/l6X4TxPDSR69NeYsdUJhE4pN2MY0c7dnd3p9A1YAkAb2f0Y/hqxD/Tdf
hoZa3b15LD2e65yNbhp5cRJgHwI+xgmF6rJkMwJOiClMnQPCpa gM2ehifwVuOEg=
=LUa4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----